Running with the numerous Narcos references that have been made throughout the anti-syndicate campaign it actually maps pretty well with the behavior of the cartels in Columbia during that period. Escobar and co. assassinated numerous politicians including presidential candidates, and at one point orchestrated an armed assault to take over the Columbian justice department and destroy the records kept there.
Thing is? The Cartels had the power to credibly tangle with, evade, or subvert the assets those states could bring to bear. In this analogy we're looking at a cartel deciding to try that shit on the US.

The Syndicate is a T3.5 power, MAYBE, in conventional conflicts. Their advantage vs the OU is ALL THE SUBVERSION. They started shit with a T1 power that's highly resistant to their standard means of subversion.

Remember that when they finally made a conventional play we smushed them in weeks.
 
Or maybe he was informing Kahurangi of the risks because he knew that the Council was going to raise a stink anyway. He still allowed Nash to be on the EC panel even though he could have removed her entirely.
Given pp is our ability to get things through the council, I don't think Seruk was responsible for that. With high-profile positions like EC captains, the Council doesn't want one person hogging the seat. I bet if Kahurangi had tried to stay around longer than ten years we would have had to pay a hefty pp price to keep her as well.
Nope.
Nash is still looking to proceed, but Seruk is raising a real stink about the possibility.
Nowhere is the council mentioned. In addition, it appears that the EC admiral chooses the EC candidates, because the panel emails are from whomever sits in that chair. Which is why Seruk kicked up such a stink -- because it was out of his hands, and quote, 'clogging his promotion pathways'. Now to be fair that comes from a non-canon GM joke:
"You will find that I don't care, so long as you stop clogging my promotion pathways."
But I would imagine @OneirosTheWriter 's joke is informed by Seruk's actual character.

So no, I am not a fan. Like this guy basically forced our hand when it came to an EC pick and y'all are acting like he's some sweet, hypercompetant bureaucrat instead of a stubborn and inflexible mule.
 
Last edited:
Nope.

Nowhere is the council mentioned. In addition, it appears that the EC admiral chooses the EC candidates, because the panel emails are from whomever sits in that chair. Which is why Seruk kicked up such a stink -- because it was out of his hands, and quote, 'clogging his promotion pathways'. Now to be fair that comes from a non-canon GM joke:

But I would imagine @OneirosTheWriter 's joke is informed by Seruk's actual character.

So no, I am not a fan. Like this guy basically forced our hand when it came to an EC pick and y'all are acting like he's some sweet, hypercompetant bureaucrat instead of a stubborn and inflexible mule.

pp is our ability to influence the Council. Ergo, someone in the council pitched a fit. Seruk may have agreed with them and relayed their request, but he does not have the power by himself to reduce our ability to negotiate with the Federation Council. Arguing that is nonsense. No one says Seruk isn't stubborn and inflexible, in fact many of us consider that his charm. And as to his competency, I've always been happy with the choices we are presented.
 
@Iron Wolf
At the end of the day, he had a point, he did his job, and we've gotten a batch of OP explorer corps captains since. The man can pick talent.

On another note, if we figure the Yan-Ros are somewhere in the 5-4, c-a ballpark I think it's probably worth putting a single diplo push on them if we can. We hit it off very well, and bringing them into the realm of auto-increases is important. Keeping the Cardassians or Sydraxians from getting their claws in is very important to keeping our coreward prospects open.
 
pp is our ability to influence the Council. Ergo, someone in the council pitched a fit. Seruk may have agreed with them and relayed their request, but he does not have the power by himself to reduce our ability to negotiate with the Federation Council. Arguing that is nonsense. No one says Seruk isn't stubborn and inflexible, in fact many of us consider that his charm. And as to his competency, I've always been happy with the choices we are presented.
That's one interpretation, I suppose, but the way it's written more suggests he's the promixal cause of the PP loss, because he's the one mentioned as being upset about it. Additionally we know from Revak that Starfleet personnel can have friends on the council. It's entirely possible Seruk has influence as well.

@Iron Wolf
At the end of the day, he had a point, he did his job, and we've gotten a batch of OP explorer corps captains since. The man can pick talent.
As I said, it appears the EC head actually picks that talent, but I admit I could be wrong there.
 
Randomly... Did we get pp or at least crew #s for our two new members? I seem to remember they'd be ratified in q4 but it's now the next year with nary a peep.

Also... Need to put together new fleet escort argument...
 
I would be stunned if Seruk did not have influence on the Council, but I seriously doubt he was the proximate cause of Nash's PP issue. Nash's career was unorthodox enough that the Council probably noticed her antics on a regular basis.

I'm pretty sure he has a role in who ends up on the EC panel even if final selection isn't his.
 
That Caledonia diplo event we missed back in M1 looks to have been a case of spectacular bad luck. I just took a look, and we had TWO non-EC events fire in the same sector, and had the bad luck of having the Excelsior, not the Oberth, reply to the science event. There's really not much we could have done to avert it.

@Nix
When you do your next map, you're going to need to update the Ferasa sector as well as adding the GBZ - the Qloathi got rolled into the Ferasa sector. Which makes things interesting for the Dawair because they're completely boxed in.
 
@Nix
When you do your next map, you're going to need to update the Ferasa sector as well as adding the GBZ - the Qloathi got rolled into the Ferasa sector. Which makes things interesting for the Dawair because they're completely boxed in.
And like I said the last few times this was brought up I need to know what the border is actually supposed to look like now first. It's too sensitive for me to make something up.
 
And like I said the last few times this was brought up I need to know what the border is actually supposed to look like now first. It's too sensitive for me to make something up.

As I recall, the Qloathi are above the galactic plane, so it's possible that their territory could connect to Federation space without boxing the Dawiar in. I know that's hard to show on your map.

I thought it was supposed to be q4 2313.

We never got a firm date; I expect it'll be at the end of this quarter given that Oneiros agreed with our plan to garrison the Apinae sector starting Q2.
 
I'd love to see Seruk gone any day now. Remember he was the guy who put a PP cost on ka'Sharren, which implies he was going to kick up a stink at the Council level. And we got mad at Linderly for being insubordinate!
I have come to interpret it as it being Seruk trying to warn us about a political problem that would in large part come from other directions. Such as all the cranky councillors we spent 5 pp/year to assuage ganging up on us. Such as some of Nash's actual fans and supporters arguing that she's being unfairly held back for promotion give that the other two Explorer Corps captains of her year both have responsible high-profile commands.

It just plain isn't normal for the same officer to command the same ship for fifteen years. We shouldn't expect that to go down easily.

Plus the whole WMD and all out open warfare.

And their affiliation with the Spoonheads.

I'm reminded of a omake by @Simon_Jester that basically sums up the Orion issue at the moment. We need to actually move on the Hypercorps in addition to the Syndicate, because otherwise, we'll be dealing with this in 20 more years.
[Looks down at self]

[Looks over at Leila]

[self]

[Leila]

...I thiiink you may want to edit this post. :D

Yeah, but that happened long after we started our anti-syndicate actions. They where helping the Spoonheads kill our goverment-officials before we got started with the whole anti-slavery taskforce stuff. I think that was what triggered it?
The proximate cause of the Anti-Slavery Act of 2309 (which started our campaign against the Syndicate in force) was the crippling of the Courageous and presumed death of Captain Ajam, after her ship struck a mine while investigating evidence that the Syndicate was responsible for selling the Cardassians the cloaking device they used on the Kadak-Tor.

The Syndicate certainly wasn't LIKED after we blamed them for the attack on the Amarki ratification ceremony (which we have reason to think was actually a Cardassian op that used the Syndicate as the fall guys girls). But we didn't go all out Space Iraq counter-insurgency on them until the Courageous incident.

All the more reason to start the Kadeshi reverse-engineering project.
Part of the Crew, Part of the Ship. Forever!
Enterprise:

[frowns]

"I love Nash, I miss her terribly even though Sam's doing absolutely great. But seriously, that is just creepy. Stop. Just stop. Crew are for loving, not for being commingled with. Captains, likewise."

That's some shitty cost benefit analysis. Starting a war with a great power is a very, very large cost. Cardassia can't have offered them nearly enough money for that to be worth it.
The Syndicate wasn't expecting the Federation to 'go to war' with them over the Amarkia incident, as indeed we did not.

I would be stunned if Seruk did not have influence on the Council, but I seriously doubt he was the proximate cause of Nash's PP issue. Nash's career was unorthodox enough that the Council probably noticed her antics on a regular basis.
We know they did, because Nash cost us 5pp a year every year she sat in the captain's chair.
 
Welp, that's good. We should get a decent amount of PP from the two ratifications, and from the emergency meeting we know the Orions probably won't be too far behind. Maybe another 40-50 or so? And maybe another 25-30 next year.
 
Welp, that's good. We should get a decent amount of PP from the two ratifications...
Political will boosts from ratifications aren't a given, it depends on how the Council (especially the new members) views Starfleet. If something goes wrong during the ratification, or if it creates trouble and complications for the Federation, we may not get the political will boost.

Irrizziza will be upset if Enterprise isn't lead ship for the Apiata.
In space, no one can hear you angrily buzz.

...Who are we kidding, Irrizziza will find a way to break that rule.
 
Back
Top