Nervos Belli
Don't think this means you've won!
- Location
- Murica
[X] Plan Gabriel Warzone Except put T'Mir in the GBZ and send the Calypso to Rigel in Q2.
D12 req, but yes, gain +5 for Apinae Starbase, +5 for Outposts.@OneirosTheWriter you never did tell us the final defense requirement for the Apinae Sector and if the Outposts there add Defense!
D12 req, but yes, gain +5 for Apinae Starbase, +5 for Outposts.
Apinae Sector – Assumed to Require D12 as of 2313.Q2
Gabriel Border Zone (starts 2313.Q1) – Requirement Left to Starfleet judgment
- Current – Starbase I (5) [Grand Hive of Apinae], Extra Outposts (5)
- New Q2 2313 - 1 Constellation (3) [Challorn], 1 Miranda (2) [Thunderhead], Starbase I (5) [Grand Hive of Apinae], Extra Outposts [5] = 15D
- Notes: Bringing in Challorn in from GBZ, with the Thunderhead coming from Vulcan.
- Current – Nothing
- New Q1 2313 - 2 Excelsiors (12) [Salnas, Endurance], 2 Constitution-B (10) [Korolev, Saratoga], 1 Constellation (3) [Challorn], 1 Centaur-A (3) [Winterwind], 1 Miranda (2) [Calypso] = 30D
- New Q2 2313 – 2 Excelsior (12) [Salnas, Endurance], 3 Constitution-B (5) [Korolev, Saratoga, Republic], Centaur-A (3) [Winterwind], 1 Miranda (2) [Calypso], 2 Miranda-A (4) [Shield, Fidelity] = 36D (39 combat)
- Notes: Salnas from Amarkia Sector, Endurance from SBZ, Korolev and Saratoga from unassigned pool, and Challorn sent from the Cardassian Border Zone. In 2313.Q2 bring Republic in from Rigel sector, send Challorn to new Apinae Sector, and bring Shield and Fidelity in from refit.
@Briefvoice in light of outposts, maybe use the Challorn to anchor the Apinae sector and shift the Connie there to GBZ. The Challorn is their equal at P and S, and we keep our 2 ship force rather than reducing to 1. e: Or better yet, shift in the Winterwind instead of the Challorn. Again, exact same stats.
Hmm. My opinion of Briefvoice's plan is that it doesn't do enough stripping down of sectors.
With that new data, a Constitution from Apinae, the Kumari from CBZ, 1 Miranda from RBZ, and maybe also the KBZ, would up our combat in Gabriel Expanse by 15-18.
I'm guessing you mean a sub-2Mt explorer for 'replace the excelsior' and not the Ambasador class, no matter what size that might be?Frankly, I would also like to replace the Excelsior, although I realize we wouldn't finish that project in time.
Cardassian shipbuilding needs 3 years to make their own first wave if their resource infusions were recent, which we know from Ghosts and Whispers and subsequent shipbuilding reports that they are.
I can't finalize anything from the SDB but... we have 1 year escorts and the Rennie was a generational design where this would not be. 1y research and 1.5y prototyping is not out of the question, although who knows, the sheet is still up in the air.
e: I mean, the real advantage would be production rate, which is equivalent to getting free berths.
I know it's not relevant but I get a real kick out of the maximum ~effort~ that went into the Galaxy mockup's nacelles, @Leila Hann.
Quick Q -- those little 'notches' on the side of the Seyek Explorer -- and I noted there's similar structures on their other ships -- do you envision them as weapons projectors?
The line must be drawn in bright fire, drawn not from intolerance, but from hope for sentient people to breathe in the air of freedom. You will stop the onslaught of the Union and their twisted anti-Federation, this Axis of Fear, into the Gabriel Expanse, and you will claim it for the free people of the Galaxy, with the sincere hope that the day will come when Cardassians, Sydraxians, and others may stand and count themselves among that number.
It's kinda funny because the ship in that screencap is the unarmed science ship -- the actual battleships and such have turrets along the spine and are much blockier, as you can infer from the gallery and selected images below:Mayyyybe? I based the seyek ships pretty heavily on the screencap you posted from Stellaris.