I don't think anything less that declaring war will suffice. The scope of the conflict has gotten too big to consider it a police action any longer, and the Amrki will probably not accept anything less.

My problem with @Briefvoice's plan is that while direct contact between the Amarki and the Orion Union is certainly desirably, I don't trust them to come up with a coordinated plan of action in short time. We can't hold 3 months of negotiations before taking action.

[X] Plan United We Stand
 
I like a lot of your vote. It's pretty great stuff, and I think your point about pressuring the Orion corporations to think about what joining the Cardassians would mean is very well-taken. But this part I quoted? No. You can't tell the Amarkians that they need to be "humble" or approach "hat in hand". You just can't. They are not the supplicants here.
They are not the supplicants, but the ego of the Orion Union and it's people must be salved. They cannot be allowed to feel as though they are being invaded, strong-armed, or their rights violated. If they are to be the hosts of the Armakians, then the Armakians must ask-and if the Union refuses, then the Armakians can ask again and step up their political and popular campaign, but they cannot violate the Union's sovereignty. So go humbly. Go without pride, remembering that you have a reason to be here, and they are perfectly within their rights to judge when that reason may be satisfied.

That being said, I'll back you over any plan that calls for the word WAR.
 
Last edited:
I'll be the paranoid Romulan and come out and say it: Cardassia has more or less just fired shots at us. Given that Syndicate is fundamentally a crime organization, I can't see them actually agreeing to this. However petty and ruthless they might be, their primary consideration is profit; bombing the capital of most warlike member of per-eminent superpower of Alpha Quadrant is like "there's incompetent, and there's you people"-stupid, because that's how you get a quadrant's worth of resources drop onto you like a sack of bricks. The entreaty is frankly too timely to be a coincidence.

But that said, if this does turn into a war, it's a pretty good bet that our forces will be stretched thin dealing with a hundred-odd problems. I don't think Cardassia or its affiliates will really have the resources to defeat us, but they can make it into a forever war slugging match that results in shitty DMZ solutions.

Therefore, I'm currently voting for:

[X] Briefvoice

I'll be honest, given how Amaraki seem to work, and how they're responding, I'm not entirely sure we'll be able to reign them in, but sometimes you need to roll a hard six. As an addendum, we should probably explain to them this is just the beginning, and while syndicate will collapse in time, our true enemy is Cardassia. They may be smug, and they might bite hard, but we're making inroads into isolating them. Let them loose their allies, let them retreat into their space, and watch as Syndicate gets slowly strangled. And that is when we unleash our Excelsior fleet and atomize anything between Bajor and Cardassia that looks at us remotely funny.

I agree that this action doesn't fit the classical criminal group (that I also viewed the syndicate) but Oneiros is clearly going for more a poltical resistance/terroist approach and here such an action makes sense since they likely repurcassions will most likely help the syndicate in the longterm (recuitment, how the populace views them etc).


That said I admit that more information about the attack and who did it would be nicer.

I don't think anything less that declaring war will suffice. The scope of the conflict has gotten too big to consider it a police action any longer, and the Amrki will probably not accept anything less.

My problem with @Briefvoice's plan is that while direct contact between the Amarki and the Orion Union is certainly desirably, I don't trust them to come up with a coordinated plan of action in short time. We can't hold 3 months of negotiations before taking action.

[X] Plan United We Stand

If the Federation is anything like a modern democracy/state than declaring official war on a terrorgroup might not be the smartest of ideas (if its even legally possible since in RL, international law is for example not really designed for such a thing). Especially since enemy combatans are generally granted special rights etc.
 
The Syndicate is not an entity you can declare war on, and doing so legitimizes them as a government. If we declare war, the Cardassians can start supporting them openly, for example.
I doubt the Cardassians particularly care what a state they don't even talk to recognizes as a government. If their aims were better served by treating the Syndicate as its own government they'd be doing that. I think this most recent offer makes it pretty clear why they think they're better served treating the Syndicate like a faction within the Union: it means they can potentially get the entire Union by default as long as they keep the Syndicate on side.
 
Any polity would be in the right to go after someone who detonated a nuclear device in their capitol. The idea that the Amarki can be stopped is to me best summed up as: not fucking likely. So the best approach is to take their ideas and make them into something we can use. If we try to halt the Amarki while we bring the Amarki and the Union to the negotiating table, and either fail or negotiations fail, then the Amarki escalate, the Union gets couped, and the Federation loses legitimacy to both parties and to all observers. It's a high risk option compared to accepting that no matter what we do, the Amarki will want to use force. We can direct that force as best we can, and in doing so we maintain legitimacy. Also, they aren't exactly in the position to refuse help on the grounds that we're responding to an attack on Federation citizens.

The points of failure are less severe, in my opinion.
 
I doubt the Cardassians particularly care what a state they don't even talk to recognizes as a government. If their aims were better served by treating the Syndicate as its own government they'd be doing that. I think this most recent offer makes it pretty clear why they think they're better served treating the Syndicate like a faction within the Union: it means they can potentially get the entire Union by default as long as they keep the Syndicate on side.

I think the situation is more nuanced than that. For example, they can make the argument that their shipping or one of their client's is "neutral" if an official state of war exists. They can post official "observers". They can send "volunteers". And so on. These are all things that have happened in real life.

e: You know how the Councilors are freaking out about war on the Cardassians if the Union accepts the coup offer? Well, to avoid all of the above, we would have up declare war on them too. The Cardassians would force us to a state of war either way if we start treating the Syndicate as a nation state.
 
Last edited:
If the Amarki invade the Union, we have to fight them. It's perverse but the same reasons that give us reason to respond to the Syndicate apply; this is an attack across membership lines. Starfleet and the Federation won't let members beat each other up. We need to ensure that the Amarki understand this.

Second, there is a lot of blame to go around here. This was not a simple operation. Linderly should be worried about his job here. The Amarki need to present clear and airtight evidence of how this was accomplished when speaking to the Union.

Third, the Union needs reinforcements to its paramilitary troops. The Amarki can provide. And the Amarki are coming in. We would prefer some kind of Flying Tigers/Blue Division arrangement with the Orion government, but if that fails then we'll reactivate the Starfleet Marine Corps (who are actually canon per The Undiscovered Country) and enlist them into the Anti-Syndicate Task Force. Keeping them out is not an option.
 
If the Amarki invade the Union, we have to fight them. It's perverse but the same reasons that give us reason to respond to the Syndicate apply; this is an attack across membership lines. Starfleet and the Federation won't let members beat each other up. We need to ensure that the Amarki understand this.
Union is not a member. We are certainly doing all we can in negotiations, but we are not putting our ships between the Amarki and Orion if it comes that far.
 
Union is not a member. We are certainly doing all we can in negotiations, but we are not putting our ships between the Amarki and Orion if it comes that far.

Yes, we are. The Union is an affiliate, and one with high integration at that. We have treaties with them. Their sovereignty will be respected or Federation affiliate status will become a bad joke.
 
Last edited:
I see that as a point for declaring war, rather than doing some ill-defined "armed intervention". Having some rules in place is a good thing.
How do you repatriate them? How does the Syndicate surrender? The Syndicate are currently treated as civilians. That means they have rights right now too. Turning them into military combatants is a point against fair treatment and also undermines the idea of justice for crimes. e: For example, the Rixx Scrutineers would probably lose jurisdiction.
 
Union is not a member. We are certainly doing all we can in negotiations, but we are not putting our ships between the Amarki and Orion if it comes that far.

We can't let members beat up affiliates either. (And the only reason they're not a member is because of the Syndicate in the first place.) We would still have to fight them, or take an even more massive hit to our legitimacy as a government.
 
We can't let members beat up affiliates either. (And the only reason they're not a member is because of the Syndicate in the first place.) We would still have to fight them, or take an even more massive hit to our legitimacy as a government.
The Union did not get their own criminals under control and now a Union-citizen has used a WMD in another nations capital. That is a legitimate reason for war.
War would be stupid at this point and we'll try to stop it, with all peaceful options we have, but it's not something we should fight our own members to prevent.

If it comes that far I'd rather support the Amarki to to give at least the other powers in the galaxy the illusion of unity among our members than starting a war with Amarkia.
 
We can't let members beat up affiliates either. (And the only reason they're not a member is because of the Syndicate in the first place.) We would still have to fight them, or take an even more massive hit to our legitimacy as a government.
Two sections of a nation's military fighting each other is never a good way to maintain legitimacy. If Starfleet actually fires on Amarki ships we will have a civil war on our hands.
 
Declaring war on the Syndicate also likely loses us the ability to have a graduation of punishment. The Syndicate flunkie who picks pockets and then moved to strongarming for a loanshark is treated as an enemy combatant. She has nothing to do with the fanatic terrorist one planet over who detonated an antimatter warhead on a foreign planet. One of them deserves a few months. The other several thousand lifetime sentences. Only both are now enemy combatants, and we'll sort them out after the smoke has cleared. Does the punishment still fit the crime? Do the methods still allow thorough civilian investigation and trial in civilian court?
 
The Union did not get their own criminals under control and now a Union-citizen has used a WMD in another nations capital. That is a legitimate reason for war.

Unless you're arguing they did so under the direction of the Union government no it's not. This is not the UK in the Age of Sail. We do not solve criminal matters with warships.
 
DISCUSSION OF THE OPTIONS:

[] Declare a State of Emergency. Don't be too hasty to declare war, but ready the fleet to go at a moment's notice.
A state of emergency involves an existential threat to the Federation as a whole. This isn't it. Actual war with Cardassia might be, but this is not that. We could reasonably declare High Alert, but it wouldn't serve a useful purpose because all it would let us do is reshuffle spaceships, and that wouldn't accomplish very much.

Crazy Tom said:
[ ] "...the greatest challenge laying before us is to do what must be done without undoing the dream of the Federation. Admiral Ramirez said that in his first speech to the Council during the Four Year War, and it's never been more applicable. Madam President, this is your Axanar. The Amarki are angry, it falls to you to shape that anger into a fury that is as ice in composition and character. They are a martial people, and victory in this case demands the fortitude to be patient in the face of personal tragedy. Remind them that their enemies want them to be brash and reactionary, and so they must be cold, and calculating. An invasion of Orion space is the Syndicate's desired goal for this attack, so the Amarki must instead pay them the greatest insult an enemy can suffer. To be ignored."
The wording of this works because the Amarki won't do literally nothing and that's not realistic. But I like its general tenor.

Mr Tebbs said:
[] "...the greatest challenge laying before us is to do what must be done without undoing the dream of the Federation. Admiral Ramirez said that in his first speech to the Council during the Four Year War, and it's never been more applicable. Madam President, this is your Axanar. The Amarki are angry, it falls to you to shape that anger into a fury that is as ice in composition and character. They are a martial people, and victory in this case demands the fortitude to be patient in the face of personal tragedy. Remind them that their enemies want them to be brash and reactionary, and so they must be cold, and calculating. An invasion of Orion space is the Syndicate's desired goal for this attack, so the Amarki must instead pay them the greatest insult an enemy can suffer. To be ignored."
-[]The syndicate isn't scared of Amarki over reaction, they're scared of Amarki measured reaction. If the Amarkians are the brutes they seem to believe them to be, then as soon as an Amarki warship enters Alukk space, they've won the initiative. If however, the Amarkians were to send their gendarmes to assist their union brothers in arms (either officially or as 'concerned consultants'), the way they assisted Star Fleet during the biophage crisis, then I know they will be instrumental in guiding us through this new crisis successfully.
-[]If that is insufficient for the Amarki people, perhaps having their fleet work with Star Fleet to provide better border patrol will ameliorate them. Or perhaps a system mandatory anti-pheremone inoculations at every port of entry for everyone, regardless of whether they are coming from Orion space, to ensure that no thralls slip through into Amarkia proper.
This is good. I like this.


Briefvoice said:
[] Madame President, let us consider three dimensions here. The political, the strategic, and the moral.
-[] The political: Amarkia must act and be seen to act, the current government of the Orion Union must not fall, and the actions of terrorists must not be allowed to magnificently succeed in producing precisely the result they want.
-[] The strategic: the Federation has been making in-roads against Cardassian-affiliated species everywhere recently. We have achieved successful diplomacy with the Dawiar, the Gretarians, the Yrillians. They are losing the diplomatic war and they desperately need to convert this into a type of war they can win, without being seen as the aggressors.
-[] The moral: The people of Amarkia deserve justice, and it must be directed against the actual perpetrators and not misdirected against Orion Union forces.
-[] I believe the political dilemma can be resolved only by direct communication between the Amarkian and Orion Union governments. They must come a politically acceptable solution. I can think of a few suggestions off the top of my head. Perhaps the Orion Union could send an aid caravan to Lironh accompanied by Orion patrol vessels, and accept the assistance of Amarkian vessels in return. Each with their fleet above the other's world. Perhaps the Amarkians can send in their gendarmaries. I don't know; but trying to route everything through the Federation Council puts too many fingers in the pie.
-[] I believe the strategic situation can be resolved by being open about what is going on here. It may be time to expend some our intelligence assets in order to make the chain of events public. The Syndicate attacks, hoping to provoke a response that justifies a Cardassian-backed coup. It's simple enough that the public of all worlds can understand and terrible enough to shock into not playing along.
-[] As for the moral situation... I suppose we can count on the good Councillor Stesk to be our conscience there.
I like this a LOT. For several reasons But @Briefvoice, one nitpick, I'll PM you.

Ten years ago, the Orion Union had barely heard of the Armakians. Ten years ago, the Orion Syndicate was a mosquito buzzing in our collective ears. What a difference ten years makes, doesn't it? And the initial event that made us stand up and take notice of the Syndicate, what was it? The bombing of the Armakian ratification, though they weren't the only ones with a finger in that one. But they were putting the expansionists on notice, even though we didn't read the writing on the wall. 'This is our turf, and we will cut you.' We closed in around them, enveloped the Union and the syndicate together in a sea of blue, not completely-but politically. This has to gall them. It has to be stiffling for the Orions who dreamed of re-establishing their empire, to the Orions who thought that they could stand toe-to-toe with the Federation. But most of all, it stifles the Syndicate, who have nowhere to go but the Federation to preform their criminal acts. We ate and drank deeply in the oughts, and now we feel the galactic indigestion that comes of our own actions. They want us to vomit them back out, to recoil or lash out, to do something, anything, that they can exploit.

If the Armakians want into the Orion Union, they should ask, hat in hand, with greatest humility, to help the Union's own operations. They have every right to request involvement-and they can make the Orions know about how they feel in print and broadcast, to win public support and turn hands against the Syndicate. How many people in the Orion Union are willing to support terrorist attacks on foreign governments, especially when the results of said attacks are being advertised? They can use that time-redirect their intelligence services, plan police actions, coordinate with our own taskforce, increase their chance of success so they don't run in half-cocked and get us all into a shooting war. They need to remember that the Orion Syndicate's greatest victims, the ones who have suffered the most, are the Orion people themselves. Orion daughters and sons sold into slavery, Orion children sick and ransomed their treatment in exchange for their families cooperation, Orion elders threatend with the extermination of their entire families should they think of turning on the Syndicate for this atrocity. The Armakians should appreciate their own code of chivalry enough to stretch out a helping hand to fellow victims and people who are trying to do the right thing. The Orions have a tradition of hiring mercenaries-this would probably count, and it's probably a bargain-basement price for a Riala right now if the work involves hunting the Syndicate.

I don't know if that will be acceptable to them, but it feels like a compromise to me-nobody's happy, but everyone can live with it. As for our intelligence and what to do about it, well, if we tread carefully enough, the Orions will realize they would be no better off with Cardassia as patrons than they are currently-legitimate trade with the Federation would probably cease overnight and we could blockade them at our leisure. Their corporations wouldn't like that at all. A coup would require the help of a lot of the military and the intelligence services, to avoid it turning into a outright civil war or a counter-coup. If we are careful, we can avoid making that many Orions willing to back such a deal.
Vehrec, I actually disagree with you about a matter of fact underlying this, one that will be made clear as soon as I can write an omake. And about some of the politics, for reasons I'm sure others in this fast-flowing discussion will express. But it is well composed, and you have my respect for it.

SynchroniedWritersBlock said:
[] Madam President. This is not just an attack on the Confederacy. It is an attack on the entire Federation. The slave raid that triggered all of this could have happened anywhere. We could be trying those criminals on Ferasa, on Andor, on Earth. Here in Paris.
-[] To stop the Amarki from responding is impossible. But the Federation must also respond. To let the Amarki and Orions handle this alone is unconscionable, and flies against the reason the Federation exists. We have been attacked. All of us. The Cardassians are preying on a weakness that we allow only if we let the Amarki and Orions proceed alone.
-[] Many of our members are ready to commit forces. Why not include other members and affiliates in the action the Amarki want to take? A joint operation could even include Orion ships, and could operate under a Council mandate similar to the Anti-Syndicate Taskforce, developed in conjunction with the Orions instead of unilaterally by the Amarki. Alternately, add Starfleet assets by letting us draw down elsewhere.
-[] The Orions are worried about sovereignty. But they already allow Starfleet, the CFP, the Andorian Guard, and the UESPA to help them against the Syndicate. Without the fear that the Amarki will act unilaterally, the Cardassian offer means nothing. That means the Union needs to be involved, but it also means they need to accept that the entire Federation is going to fight alongside them.
I like this one, but I need to think carefully whether I prefer it or Briefvoice's idea.
 
DISCUSSION OF THE SITUATION:

A limited state of emergency may be useful so that we can "federalize" member-world units into service, but that's the only value of it.
Given how Federation law works, "limited state of emergency" is like "a little bit pregnant." I'm not sure it's even possible (unless you're an Andorian shen or an Apiata queen, arguably). A Federation-wide callup of member world forces isn't something our system is designed to allow, except when we've crossed the Godzilla Threshold.

[TVTropes' term is a good one, but confusing- it represents the point in a monster movie where unleashing Godzilla on the problem starts to seem like a good idea. Godzilla is insanely destructive all by himself, of course, so this implies that the problem is worse. The biophage is a good example of this category of problem. The Syndicate blowing a hole in the middle of an Amarki city isn't.]

Ato said:
We need to declare a state of emergency and a state of war agsint the Orion Syndicate. Anything less risks the Amarkians leaving the Federation, they haven't been members very long, and if they don't feel that we can live up to our promises they will just quit. At the same time we can't punish the Orion Union for the actions of the Syndicate, and thus fall into the Syndicate's quite obvious trap. Nor can we risk war with Cardassia at the same time as we are dealing with Orion insurgency.
Again, a state of emergency indicates a Federation-wide existential threat. This doesn't qualify, under the "is there any plausible way this could be one tenth as bad as the biophage" test.

Declaring war against the Syndicate isn't actually a bad idea, it's just pointless- we're already committed to destroying them and the whole galaxy knows it. Might make a good propaganda gesture but that's it.

As noted, it runs into the problem that we won't know when the war is over. While I'm sure the Federation Council will be WILLING to declare an end to the war, eventually... I'm not sure I want to set that kind of precedent.

How the fuck did they get a photorp into the courthouse?
I suspect the Amarki aren't very good at security scans, and it honestly didn't cross their mind that someone would bring an antimatter warhead into a courthouse.

What is this I don't even?!? The Syndicate just lit off a nuke-equivalent on a non-military target on a homeworld. There are some crimes so heinous that protecting the perps by means outside the court system constitutes an act of war. Antimatter weapons on non-military targets? That's one of them.

If the Union actually were to go and join the Cardassians, thus de facto declaring their willingness to throw away their independence to defend the people who did this, and functionally endorsing it, I can't see any appropriate response other that "Declaration of War acknowledged".

I am not going to vote because my personal sentiment on the appropriate response to the Cardassian offer is hawkish by Amarki standards - something along of "Do you really, really think declaring war on a superior power who has you completely enveloped is a good idea? Do that and the Orion Union rapidly stops being a thing as we burn your military and government."
You are being a silly person, in a violently silly way.

The people who are being given that offer are NOT the people actually running the Orion Union government at this time. The people running the government NOW have been loyally allied to us in the face of very serious challenges for many years.

No, the Cardassians contacted other people who might OVERTHROW that friendly government. We don't necessarily even know their names, so we cannot contact them all directly. But no, it would be folly to threaten to "burn the military and government" of the Orion Union in retaliation for a coup against the present government, while the present government is still in charge. Because what that would do, is that would remove any desire for anyone else to obey the current Union government for any reason other than fear of the Federation. Which means the Orion Union government would lose all its ability to fight the Syndicate, our ability to inflict Impact would collapse, and even if the coup didn't materialize, we'd be screwed.

Alastor Mobius Toth said:
I'll be the paranoid Romulan and come out and say it: Cardassia has more or less just fired shots at us. Given that Syndicate is fundamentally a crime organization, I can't see them actually agreeing to this. However petty and ruthless they might be, their primary consideration is profit; bombing the capital of most warlike member of per-eminent superpower of Alpha Quadrant is like "there's incompetent, and there's you people"-stupid, because that's how you get a quadrant's worth of resources drop onto you like a sack of bricks. The entreaty is frankly too timely to be a coincidence.
Uh, the Syndicate have made it fairly obvious that they are not JUST a Mafia-like organization.

They're like a cross between the Mafia and some kind of secularish-ish version of ISIL (in that any cultlike traits they show are confined to their own membership, not something they impose on everyone around them).

Suicide bombings are not a Mafia M.O., but we've seen the Syndicate pull them off. Pheromonal thralls may explain it, but they don't explain the mindset.

Furthermore, the pressures of the current situation will have driven the Syndicate out of a 'profit' mindset and into a 'survival' mindset. They have to do SOMETHING to ensure that the Orion people as a whole will weld themselves to the Syndicate and ensure that it survives the conflict in some way, shape, or form. This is their attempt to do that something- to associate "anti-Syndicate" with "anti-Orion invading alien brute squads" so firmly that the average Orion will be pro-Syndicate for centuries.

So they've given up making a profit on the current situation; they just want to assure their survival.

If the Amarki invade the Union, we have to fight them. It's perverse but the same reasons that give us reason to respond to the Syndicate apply; this is an attack across membership lines. Starfleet and the Federation won't let members beat each other up. We need to ensure that the Amarki understand this.
The Orions aren't members. They're affiliates. The Amarki know this.

If we tell them what you suggest, they'd be fairly well justified to leave the Federation and say "uh yeah, Cardassia? Remember that deal you offered our enemies who nuked our capital? Would you like us to take that offer instead? Because seriously, we hate them and the Federation won't let us do anything about it."

And then the night soil would hit the oscillating rotary ventilation device.
 
HUMOR:

One of the reasons I love @Briefvoice's plan: It makes Linderley shriek in agony at being directly ordered by the top levels of the government to reveal a secret, which finally gives us our revenge for the crap he gave Kahurangi over the Kadak-Tor incident! :D

That assumes they actually ARE involved. Remember, they for once might actually be, innocent.

Man, that was HARD typing that out. I mean, a innocent Cardassian? BWAHAHAHAHAH, that's a great joke.
Oh come on. There's lots of innocent Cardassians!

They're just not in charge of anything.
 
Declaring war on the Syndicate also likely loses us the ability to have a graduation of punishment. The Syndicate flunkie who picks pockets and then moved to strongarming for a loanshark is treated as an enemy combatant. She has nothing to do with the fanatic terrorist one planet over who detonated an antimatter warhead on a foreign planet. One of them deserves a few months. The other several thousand lifetime sentences. Only both are now enemy combatants, and we'll sort them out after the smoke has cleared. Does the punishment still fit the crime? Do the methods still allow thorough civilian investigation and trial in civilian court?
There's a concept in IR called "the accidental guerrilla". Basically, it's the idea that when you go after radical elements inside a country, particularly ones that are internationally based but operate local cells, you can create "accidental" guerrillas out of the locals who take up arms against the foreign army for nationalistic or other interests.

The context of the book about it is Islamic terrorism and groups like AQ in Iraq, but your post really touches on how it can apply as well to our current situation.
 
I agree that this action doesn't fit the classical criminal group (that I also viewed the syndicate) but Oneiros is clearly going for more a poltical resistance/terroist approach and here such an action makes sense since they likely repurcassions will most likely help the syndicate in the longterm (recuitment, how the populace views them etc).

It still reeks of a kind of action that had external help though. I mean, sure, it'll play to die-hard Syndicate crowd, but I imagine the whole rest of Orion space will be horrified.

It's one thing to do buisness with Syndicate, and saying that they're a traditional Orion society that promotes traditional Orion values; it's something entirely different from doing buisness with a society that has mandated (or was at least actively complicit) WMD attack on civilian target, killing hundreds of thousands.

Now that I think about it, assuming the whole thing doesn't go tits up, this is a good occasion to break Syndicate's image once and for all.

Unless you're arguing they did so under the direction of the Union government no it's not. This is not the UK in the Age of Sail. We do not solve criminal matters with warships.

Actually no, a good lawyer would get away with it.

I'm not sure how Star Trek spess law works, but normally you can make a case that it is permissible for a state to violate another's sovereignty if its territory or citizens had been used to launch an attack, and the other party is proved to be sufficiently unwilling, or unable to do something about it.

Granted, Orion Union is fighting the Syndicate, but frankly its handling of the situation has been fairly inept, and the sheer levels of corruption at highest levels can make for legitimate case that "no, it's not really trying".

It's of course one of those "from certain point of view" arguments, but international law in general is exceptionally poor in preventing conflicts, due to how it can be interpreted, and the wrangling that ensues.

We can't let members beat up affiliates either. (And the only reason they're not a member is because of the Syndicate in the first place.) We would still have to fight them, or take an even more massive hit to our legitimacy as a government.

The flipside of this is that we would be siding with what is essentially a rump state that has a long history of being unable to come to grips with its own conflicts without outside help, against a full-rights member that suffered a mass casualty event, has contributed forces to Federation before, and can make a good (although not surefire) case for an intervention. That frankly terminates any sense of Federation being a government in the first place.

Even if it's a moral thing to do, nobody will want to deal with a government that is unwilling to assist you if you take blows, even if you had bled for it.
 
Back
Top