Oriko got beaten, acknowledged she got beaten, and is not giving us trouble anymore. Kirika even comes along an helps on missions whenever we ask. So why the fuck should I keep her under house arrest, when I didn't do that to the girls in that other group who ripped up downtown and killed a bunch of people themselves and I let them off with a warning not to do it again?"
To address this point in general, because this particular post did make me sit down and write out the reasons I do actually have for this (for which I both thank and curse you, I need to be doing homework, mwargh! but I really like sitting down and making sure my thoughts are consistent...), and not specifically to single you out...
... because we have a severely limited ability to contain the folks who ripped up downtown, and in a pragmatic sense, we need to focus on taking care of and keeping clean our own metaphorical house first? Among which O&K are counted. Like, at least some of this comes down to social maneuvering and how we make our way in the world, and how that appears to the wider meguca community, such as it is. Oriko and Kirika are our problem; they're in our city; they've hurt our people. We have the
ability to respond to what O&K did, practically, because they're working with us about the house arrest thing and such. And it's within what I suspect the wider meguca world sees as our purview.
Actually, I might argue that the fact that O&K are basically our people, acknowledge they were beaten, and aren't giving us trouble, is a part of
why there need to be at least some consequences to what they did- even though, yes, as this whole discussion is about, we need to make sure those consequences are proportionate, appropriate, and fair.
We go around, and intervene where we can, and are getting a rep for wanting to save all meguca, and also making everyone's problems our business. But it's also pretty clear, I think, looking in, that we don't yet
have the capacity to enforce rule or law or punishment on outside groups. The world is not expecting us to go track down Iowa and stop them, for example. (Though, of course, we're half expecting Iowa to make themselves our business such that we're
required to stop them.) And also, I think we'd seem more than a little hard to work with, if we insisted on exacting punishment on outside groups for things they did
before we make it
very clear to them that if they don't want to be our enemies, don't do the thing. (While, yes, the things we're saying not to do are general things Not To Do, given the nature of the meguca society Kyubey has encouraged, we need to be approaching it from a different baseline of "things meguca have previously needed to do or let slide in order to not die" and the mindset that baseline has formed. The same way that, I think it was said earlier in the quest- Mami's standards about hunting down all familiars are very high, and not everyone is lucky enough to have the power to take the high road there.)
But, in my estimation, the pseudo-feudal thing meguca culture has going on
does expect us to handle our locals, if we're planning on being a big name. How we handle our locals and friends will say a lot about us and our conduct in the world at large. Again, we're not expected to be able to police outside groups; it's to our credit that we try, to a certain extent, and a part of why Sabrina is becoming known for her helping-people-thing, but other meguca will be aware that at this stage, we can't really enforce our standards on the world at large. Not even our allies, necessarily- hence how we're handling Sendai and Fukushima in comparison to O&K. However, we
can enforce those standards in-house, so to speak. Our decision about how to handle O&K, and what consequences they face, tells the world what conduct we find acceptable- both from our friends, and from ourselves.
It will tell them, for example, that as a group, Mitakihara doesn't condone "ends justifies the means" as a motive for arson or assault. A
fair, considered, and proportionate response to these well-intentioned-crimes, however, says that we are not inflexible or unreasonable, and also that we don't just go around executing people or being an unempathetic The Man in a world where emotions are literally life. It hopefully implies we can be trusted with justice, and to be kind, where we can, but also to not set aside legitimate grievances in the long term for expedience. That we will do our best to keep in consideration the motives behind the acts, without discarding the results of and responses to the actions themselves. The fact that these consequences are being applied to O&K, who are cooperating with them, and who have nevertheless also been visibly associated with our group as 'our people' in some sense, communicates that this is at least partially a shared concept of justice within our group. (This is also part of why being consistent with justice, now and in the future, is important.) And it makes the statement that 'our people' are not exempt from the standards we are setting, and that we don't just let people off because they're our friends. (Which is something important for meguca looking to be our allies in the future to know, too.) Hopefully, it also communicates we don't come down harder on people just because we don't like them (re: Homura and Sayaka's obvious antipathy for O&K).
Basically, what we're doing here with O&K, and even with Anri and Sendai and Fukushima, intentionally or not, is setting our standards of conduct, and declaring them both to the world at large, and to our friends- and to
Sabrina. As a thread, we're still forming Sabrina and who she is, after all.
And, given, we might as a thread have some disagreements on what those standards need to be. But that's my take, at least, on the larger question of why we're not just releasing O&K, putting aside Homura and Sayaka's objections and assuming we are certain O&K are on our side now. Obviously, Homura and Sayaka's objections (and by extent, for that matter, all our friends' objections and thoughts in general) form a big part of our full and actual reasoning, but those objections and our willingness to hear them are just as much a part of the standards of How Sabrina Behaves And Can Be Expected To Act, as I believe the responses of the wider meguca world and our reactions there are.
So, basically, we're striking a balance between proportionate punishment, rehabilitation, not disregarding our friends' concerns, and The Ramifications Of Our Actions In The Greater Megucalogical Context. And this is my assessment of how we're doing on that.
... possibly just an assessment of my own thoughts about the matter, but I dunno, it feels like this is what some other people have been getting at too?
Minor edits for formatting, commas, clarity, etc, because wow it's hard to catch those when a post gets long