this is your opinion. one I disagree with. I did ask for your reasons, and thus your opinion, but it's not fact.

please give an example. I see nothing that the planned questions tell him that he didn't already know or could infer from what he does. thus any "unpleasantness" that might result will happen anyway, if he's as actively hostile as you believe.
when both situations result in an equal loss, the option with the least gain is probably the wrong choice.
lolno

the act of questioning gives him openings to talk or pry, and tells him more about our goals
also his information is at best meaningless and at worst leads us into what he wants us to do
 
Last edited:
lolyes. just because you think so doesn't make it true.

the act of questioning gives him openings to talk or pry, and tells him more about our goals
he already knows our goals. and him "talking and prying" isn't going to make anything worse. we're immune to his bombs, so him talking does nothing harmful to us, and he can ask all the question he want's but it does him no good if we don't answer.

also his information is at best useful and at worst leads us into what he wants us to do
ftfy. we've already gotten useful information from him this last update, so that means that yes, he can give us information that's useful to us.
and I doubt we're going to get led into doing anything with everyone dissecting what he says to hell and back.
 
lolyes. just because you think so doesn't make it true.


he already knows our goals. and him "talking and prying" isn't going to make anything worse. we're immune to his bombs, so him talking does nothing harmful to us, and he can ask all the question he want's but it does him no good if we don't answer.


ftfy. we've already gotten useful information from him this last update, so that means that yes, he can give us information that's useful to us.
and I doubt we're going to get led into doing anything with everyone dissecting what he says to hell and back.

Worst he can do is start proactively informing people of our missteps on a higher level barring the insanely improbable scenario of Incubator direct action. If he's doing it anyway to try to get us killed, we've got nothing to lose though.

Just got another question idea that wouldn't give away metaknowledge.

[x]Systemic Hatter
-[x]Do Incubators have curiosity as humans would recognize it? Is there some divergent yet similar Incubator drive that enabled you to reach the stars? Would you explain it?
 
Last edited:
No, we're not. He can still harm Sabrina through Mami and the others.
yes we are, as our friends are not "bombs".
witchbomb, lichbomb, potentialbomb, etc., all those things he drops in conversation to stun the other party and give himself a massive upper hand? don't work on us.

-[x]Do Incubators have curiosity as humans would recognize it? Is there some divergent yet similar Incubator drive that enabled you to reach the stars? Would you explain it?
lets limit it to the relatively "safe" questions directly related to our previous topic.
 
If one cannot be hurt directly, their loved ones become targets instead.

Kyubey can get to Sabrina by disrupting her social links.
 
yes we are, as our friends are not "bombs".
witchbomb, lichbomb, potentialbomb, etc. all those things he drops in conversation to stun the other party and give himself a massive upper hand? don't work on us.

Now you're just being disingenuous.

The Incubator is entirely capable of killing Mami with words should it so choose.
 
You are misunderstanding me. Hurting Mami and the others through those bombs hurts Sabrina as well.
but they're not relevant to our conversation with him, currently.
Now you're just being disingenuous.
No I'm not?
The Incubator is entirely capable of killing Mami with words should it so choose.
of course he's capable of that (minus our support and that of others, etc.), but him talking to us, now is not a threat. That's what I assumed Ugo meant by the "talk" in "talk and pry".
 
Now you're just being disingenuous.

The Incubator is entirely capable of killing Mami with words should it so choose.

The original point was that in conversation with us, those bombs have no effect. Kyubey is in a position to kill Mami whether we talk to him or not.

@Conjured Blade: as much as I'm dying to ask those questions, I feel at this stage that would reveal too much about the extent of our knowledge. Sorry.
 
but they're not relevant to our conversation with him, currently.

No I'm not?

of course he's capable of that (minus our support and that of others, etc.), but him talking to us, now is not a threat. That's what I assumed Ugo meant by the "talk" in "talk and pry".
And of course he wouldn't use the fact we talked to him against us. Nope.

He wouldn't take this as a relevant tidbit to bring up to others. Nope.
 
The original point was that in conversation with us, those bombs have no effect. Kyubey is in a position to kill Mami whether we talk to him or not.

@Conjured Blade: as much as I'm dying to ask those questions, I feel at this stage that would reveal too much about the extent of our knowledge. Sorry.

The most it could imply is that Sabrina will want to talk about something in the future and is looking for how to phrase it. If you stretch a bit and take her experimentation into account, that it would be system related. It does not say what. It does not say when. It does not say anything about how much leverage or lack thereof we would have during the conversation. It could just as easily be her fishing for new ways to set up Incubator traps.
 
Ideally, Sabrina can keep humanity as a whole stable for countless millennia. That's far outside the scope of this quest, though - and given empirical evidence that emotions can violate thermodynamics and that much SCIENCE time, I'd be amazed if entropy was an insurmountable problem.
 
That is waaaaaayy out there to even be thought of right now.
That line was referring to all the other ways everyone could die, of which there are several in play right now, so it's really not.
Ideally, Sabrina can keep humanity as a whole stable for countless millennia. That's far outside the scope of this quest, though - and given empirical evidence that emotions can violate thermodynamics and that much SCIENCE time, I'd be amazed if entropy was an insurmountable problem.
Of course not, that's why we can attempt to surmount it.
 
I originally voted not to talk to Kyuubey. But since we're already talking to him, pressing him to be clearer doesn't give him any more ammunition, so:
[x] SystemicHatter

Human curiosity is really illogical.
The point of this scene was that the Incubators consider curiosity which exists without a clear goal to be illogical. However, curiosity with a clear purpose (i.e. figuring out the nature of Madokami in order to harness her energy) is another thing entirely and Kyuubey demonstrates this type of curiosity all the time.

Unless we later discover that the control of grief is a valid weapon to use against the Incubators in some way (I certainly can't think of any), that ability is no threat to the Incubators.
Our grief works as a moderately strong reality warping effect with the only notable restrictions being its inability to scan soul gems and a range limitation of 100m. And there are many other magical girls whose powers' primary limitation is the amount of magic they can use before corrupting their soul gems - a limitation which is void when they're around us. When working together with others, we have many powers available to us include time stopping, power duplication, precognition, and (in theory) teleportation, mind control, and many more. I can think of many ways that we can threaten the incubators without requiring any sort of ascension at all. Teleportation+Time Stop+Detection is one plan, for instance.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top