- Location
- East of the Sun and West of the Moon
That's a rather have-you-stopped-beating-your-wife inclusion there.Where, other than Asunaro, do we expect to find soul gems that we won't feel bad about using as test subjects?
That's a rather have-you-stopped-beating-your-wife inclusion there.Where, other than Asunaro, do we expect to find soul gems that we won't feel bad about using as test subjects?
Why in fucks name do we need to use 'test subjects'? We have Witches for that. We don't need to fuck with Asunaro, it's inhabitants, or the general vicinity. If the Soujo sisters show up here in PMAS, they *gasp* may not even be the same people they were in Kazumi Magica.Where, other than Asunaro, do we expect to find soul gems that we won't feel bad about using as test subjects?
Shockingly, having unwitched Soul Gems for research would make this work a lot easier to do...and using yourself as a test subject is rarely a good idea.Why in fucks name do we need to use 'test subjects'? We have Witches for that. We don't need to fuck with Asunaro, it's inhabitants, or the general vicinity. If the Soujo sisters show up here in PMAS, they *gasp* may not even be the same people they were in Kazumi Magica.
Because Firn is a better writer than that.
So no, lets not fuck with Asunaro, people's soul gems or anything of the sort. We don't need 'test subjects' like Sabrina is some sort of insane cackling mad scientist.
...as a small aspect of Sabrina, I can happily say that I like having someone less "Stupid Good" on our side, for the day where our power isn't sufficient to make up for our idiotic, reckless behavior.Yes, but that's not the aspect of her character Sabrina likes. Or wants to encourage.
Shockingly, Sabrina isn't going to SCIENCE on people's souls. That's not how she's grown as a character. She's just as much her own character as she is the thread.Shockingly, having unwitched Soul Gems for research would make this work a lot easier to do...and using yourself as a test subject is rarely a good idea.
I only bring up the test subjects thing because it may be necessary to test the differences between how soul gems and grief seeds react to various stimuli.
That's kind of getting ahead of ourselves, we'll probably find a few disembodied gems on the soujo's and even if we didn't, we still aren't going to rock people to use as test subjects. It's too unethical for Sabrina. The furthest I could see Sabrina going is to kill someone, and even then the person in question would need to be too dangerous to capture, and too dangerous to allow to run free. Capturing people's souls to experiment on them for our larger goals? That's unnecessary, unethical, and way OOC.What if it was to test creating replacement bodies for soul gems, so that we are prepared for when we figure out how to turn grief seeds back into soul gems?
Ah. We just joke about it. Sabrina doesn't like the idea of going there, but scorched earth was never on the table.Yeah I get it, I was kinda running under the assumption that the general attitude of the thread so far will cause the top of Asunaro to be a Berserk Button for Sabrina when it becomes relevant.
Certainly not. Sabrina has never been known to cackle.We don't need 'test subjects' like Sabrina is some sort of insane cackling mad scientist.
She already has, you know? Witches are still human souls...so, yes, we've been doing SCIENCE on people's souls.Shockingly, Sabrina isn't going to SCIENCE on people's souls. That's not how she's grown as a character. She's just as much her own character as she is the thread.
"Take a third option" is kind of what Sabrina does though. Anyway, we don't have any particularly dangerous experiments that would also be useful to attempt on a soul gem. It would be pointless.She already has, you know? Witches are still human souls...so, yes, we've been doing SCIENCE on people's souls.
As for her limits as a character...the only time we've pushed them was that time we threatened to Witch Kirika. She did it anyway, because she had to stop Oriko, and doing something horrible was apparently worth it.
Sabrina doesn't do unpleasant things if she doesn't have to, but would she as a last resort? If the choice is between studying a Soul Gem, at some risk to the soul inside, or not saving the thousands of souls trapped in eternal torment...tell me, do you think she's Stupid Good enough to not do what must be done, if the situation arises? Stupid Good enough to choose clean hands over the souls of thousands, if not millions?
We're definitely "Good," but whether we're "do no wrong" Good or "do everything I can" Good is unclear at the moment.
Then don't speak in absolutes, if you're only addressing this specific situation. Yes, she doesn't need to here...but that doesn't mean she won't if the situation changes.Except that the situation isn't that kind of binary choice...and there's a difference between doing what we need to on Witches and experimenting on functional, normal souls that haven't already been damned.
Yes, yes you are. You'd rather risk everything on a long shot than do something distasteful, and it will probably come back to bite you some day, unless Firn chooses to provide you a morally painless alternative every time.And yes, we are. We are exactly that Stupid Good because we'll try and find a third option every time.
But dirtnap was right. He said that SCIENCE (actually different from proper science) on the souls contained within soul gems in that context is not something that would be in Sabrina's character. He was talking about the current situation, even if you could read it as a blanket statement. Perhaps in the future Sabrina may perform some experiments upon soul gems, but it would need to be something unambiguously safe, and she would need to have a pressing reason to go through with any such experiments. As it is, we just don't have a good reason to do something that could go so horrifically wrong.Then don't speak in absolutes, if you're only addressing this specific situation. Yes, she doesn't need to here...but that doesn't mean she won't if the situation changes.
As for the difference in experimenting...yes, there's a difference. Dirtnap did not acknowledge that difference, however. He made a blanket statement...I simply pointed out that said statement wasn't exactly accurate.
Yes, yes you are. You'd rather risk everything on a long shot than do something distasteful, and it will probably come back to bite you some day, unless Firn chooses to provide you a morally painless alternative every time.
I am not, and I'm sure I'm not the only part of Sabrina who cares more about fixing the issues at hand than walking away from this lily-white.
Again, though, I was responding to Dirtnap. He attempted to define Sabrina's character in a way that ignores past evidence (willingness to threaten Kirika) and unclear territory (situations where a third option is either unavailable or supremely foolish). I simply pointed out that we do not know what would happen. We do not know what Sabrina would do from an IC perspective. We don't even know what the thread would choose, if pressed into a situation where Stupid Good was far more Stupid than Good.
Indeed...it reads a lot more like a blanket statement to me, but I don't disagree if you assume otherwise.But dirtnap was right. He said that SCIENCE (actually different from proper science) on the souls contained within soul gems in that context is not something that would be in Sabrina's character. He was talking about the current situation, even if you could read it as a blanket statement. Perhaps in the future Sabrina may perform some experiments upon soul gems, but it would need to be something unambiguously safe, and she would need to have a pressing reason to go through with any such experiments. As it is, we just don't have a good reason to do something that could go so horrifically wrong.
...kidnapping for experimentation does seem like something Sabrina wouldn't resort to. She'd use her own Soul Gem first, probably, although some might not approve.So far as capturing people and playing with their souls, though? No. No we won't be doing that and I'm fine with that being a blanket statement.