Jackercracks
In a British accent
- Location
- England
I wonder what people would do if we made a grief body then accidentally forked ourselves. Two Sabrinas at the same time, the world could not handle it.
How would that work? Would one of them be an NPC? Would we control both, in a de facto hive mind? Would it externalize the differences of opinion in the thread, with our companions being surprised to see what is very nearly the same person arguing so much?I wonder what people would do if we made a grief body then accidentally forked ourselves. Two Sabrinas at the same time, the world could not handle it.
Well, we'd solve the Mami school problem...I wonder what people would do if we made a grief body then accidentally forked ourselves. Two Sabrinas at the same time, the world could not handle it.
I remember it happening. It was maybe around the same time we tested the blasters? Anyway, the normal magic hammer made a much bigger crater than the grief hammer. It's one of the main reasons I suggested using hammers for the rail gun actually. If it's a force multiplier not just an addition then the effects would be quite stunning. Ah well, the railgun can wait. As long as we finish it before walpurgis it doesn't matter hugely.
100m range though
Checking... Not really.we confirmed that Sabrina does not need to breathe when we first tried the barrier thing to block everything out.
Firnagzen said:You sigh softly, considering what to- well, actually. You seal the book away in Grief again and dissolve the sphere, taking deep, grateful breaths of the fresh air outside the sphere. You're pretty sure you don't actually need to breathe, but the air in there was getting rather stale.
I mean creating 'normal' magic hammers in different sizes, something that's being covered by the current vote.I remember it happening. It was maybe around the same time we tested the blasters? Anyway, the normal magic hammer made a much bigger crater than the grief hammer. It's one of the main reasons I suggested using hammers for the rail gun actually. If it's a force multiplier not just an addition then the effects would be quite stunning. Ah well, the railgun can wait. As long as we finish it before walpurgis it doesn't matter hugely.
I mean creating 'normal' magic hammers in different sizes, something that's being covered by the current vote.
justinkal said we tried it once, but found the hammers unwieldy. I think I remember some discussion about bigger hammers and them not being useful since we couldn't handle them, but now we know we can make giant grief hands...
I don't think an AI will work for meta reasons. The second you build an AI the quest is over for all intents and purposes. The correct answer to every problem from then onwards is just
[ ] Tell the AI the situation. Ask it what the perfect move to make is? Implement its suggestions.
And that's just boring as all hell. We'd have to move over to user fiction
I was thinking that myself, but there's a difference. Oriko gives predictions, AI gives solutions. Oriko goes 'that will end poorly, come up with a new plan'. AI goes 'this is how to solve everything forever in sequentially ordered steps'.@Jackercracks: That is kinda like what we do with Oriko already.
And in some ways, Oriko is better than AI for this.
Hah, I thought we were on the save wavelength quite often. We've been reading the same stuff. High five.Size shifting would be cool, but I'm a little more hesitant about the idea of creating a sentient AI (for familiars or for anything else). That's a dangerous box to open (and a difficult one to close), so we should be sure that all of our bases covered before we try it. The potential benefits of creating a friendly AI are extremely tempting, but the potential downsides are... well, just look at Kyuubey for an example.
"WALL-E."I don't think an AI will work for meta reasons. The second you build an AI the quest is over for all intents and purposes. The correct answer to every problem from then onwards is just
[ ] Tell the AI the situation. Ask it what the perfect move to make is? Implement its suggestions.
Yeah, I know. By the time you've finished step 9, step 10 is completely different from what it was when you were doing step 1. Plans altered and remade on the fly to suit changing outcomes. A'course, one of the first steps in most plans an AI would spit out is probably 'ask Oriko the following questions'.@Jackercracks:
Oriko has functional omniscience for the predictions and can try those until you find one that works.
AI does not have such omniscience, and won't be able to create long-term predictions due butterfly effect, limitation of light speed and 100m range.
Hm. Could this mean that Sabrina is an artificial intelligence?Yeah, I know. By the time you've finished step 9, step 10 is completely different from what it was when you were doing step 1. Plans altered and remade on the fly to suit changing outcomes. A'course, one of the first steps in most plans an AI would spit out is probably 'ask Oriko the following questions'.
Depends on the amount of information it has access to and how good it is at working from that. One AI way back before Earth was built managed to deduce the existence of income tax and rice pudding from "I think therefore I am".AI does not have such omniscience, and won't be able to create long-term predictions due butterfly effect, limitation of light speed and 100m range no matter how good an observation it has.
I'd love that. Extra eyes, maybe something that could block incoming attacks without Sabrina knowing about it. Sabrina usually misses something or other in the midst of battle and needs a friendly warning or intervention.