Voting is open
The text certainly doesn't support it, and it seems self-evident that having your own body and being allowed to go around not-murdering people is less harsh than being trapped in someone else's head, only allowed to talk or see out when your jailor lets you.
Again:

Somewhat is smaller than Middling?

This is a legitimate question, Have I been using that word wrong all this time?

...Well.
 
That isn't true.
I quote:
Actually, wouldn't that depend on how you interpret "somewhat" and "middling"? I've known people to use "middling" to instead mean "very little", which is inaccurate, but if that's what you're used to, then that's how you'd likely interpret it.

Not saying it's accurate mind, but I can see how it might have come about.
 
We knew from the beginning when we left Earth and fled for Garenhuld there were other saiyans in the galaxy. Not every saiyan came with us when we left for Garenhuld three hundred years ago.
Point of order: we had very good reason to think that all living saiyans not part of the Exile refugee flotilla were dead, because they either made it to the ships and fled Earth, or died with Earth. We had no compelling reason to assume there were survivors elsewhere, since I don't think we even knew for sure if Tarble was canon.

It also opens the door for him to actually hate her.
Prisoners do not automatically become attached to their prison guards; it takes effort, and skill, and a little luck.
Especially since head dragon is explicitly one of the harshest imprisonment options we could pick, which means any relations are going to start at a significant malus anyway.
To be fair, I bet Kakara could do it, but it would take EFFORT, and I'm not sure I want us to be forced into a situation where we must choose either to expend that effort or to court disaster.

As someone that's voting on your side right now, I feel obliged to inform you that Kakara has control over everything about his imprisonment; she can even let him talk to other people telepathically, or if he wants freedom to move around, give him a time share on her body while she's off doing things in multiform as well.
Thing is... doing either of those sounds like a really bad idea. We will almost certainly not vote to do those things. Letting the dragon communicate telepathically without letting him tap into and use enough power to be a problem? Sounds tricky, and if we get it wrong Bad Things could happen. Letting the dragon time-share our body, or one of our bodies? Super-problematic, especially if Dazarel is still even slightly inclined to use that benefit to make our lives harder.

We could also evolve the mild distrust we have of sorcery from A Cause into a greater distrust due to the several pages of discussion in which we doubt the expert opinion of most of our sorcerers regarding the sealing procedure.:p
[folds arms]

Tell me, did you READ what I had to say about the sorcerors maybe being wrong? Or did you just skim it and accidentally misrepresent it in a mocking fashion?

Because I was very explicit about the fact that I believe the sorcerors are intelligent, competent, and that their opinion is a considerable reassurance that permanently put to rest some of my doubts. My continued skepticism was based entirely on the fact that the sorcerors are mere mortals and can be wrong (and for that matter even the gods themselves are hilariously fallible in Dragonball). I explicitly compared them to groups I approve of on the whole, such as engineers.

Except the dragon showed no indication of having a psychic ability that would let him do that.
No, but then, he was never a psychic inside our mind, and there were considerable physical distractions preventing him from concentrating his full effort on taking over one of us. Telepathy sufficient to enable reading minds may not enable controlling minds, but it's hardly unrealistic to be concerned about this.

The point being, opening up the seal to let the dragon's power flow through is very likely to enable the dragon to affect the outside world, and to do so in ways detrimental to us if it is so inclined.

We have been over this. Someone mentioned we will definitively have to take social options if we chooseto seal him inside of us, Poptart replied that if sealed inside of us then Kakara would interact with him by default because the vote to seal him in our head is meant to have him interact with us. We could always interact with him when we are not doing something critical. And no, it would not be in character for Kakara to shut him out automatically because the intent behind said vote is to take responsability to redeem it ourselves.
Right.

So either Kakara is opening herself up to persistent harassment by the dragon (if the dragon proves recalcitrant and irritates her regularly), OR she is committing to spending considerable time and effort 'talking down' the dragon into a non-obnoxious state, OR she is going to end up having to lock him down in self-defense to get some peace and quiet.

We can't have it both ways. We can't have the advantage of being in permanent mental contact with a powerful, hostile, but redeemable imprisoned mind, without the disadvantage of being in permanent mental contact with a powerful, redeemable, but hostile imprisoned mind.

We had to spend an action to repair our relationship with our brother to repair our relationship with our brother. We still interacted with him in a daily basis. That is how she noticed she had to repair her relationship with her brother. The action was to put the extra effort into it, to ask him what his problem was and spend more time with him until it was freaking fixed.
Right. By default interaction occurs, improving relationships or preventing their decay takes action points.

Now apply that pattern, but remember that Dazarel starts out hating us. If that pattern holds, every day Dazarel will be interacting with us by default, but based on a platform of hatred. So we've got a busy teenage girl with a voice in her head shouting "I hate you, these Garenhulders are contemptible shrimps and you are an ignorant monkey-girl, I HATE THIS PLANET!"

The most likely outcomes I can see are:
1) Kakara presses 'Mute' on Dazarel and only ever turns the sound back on when she's unusually ready to listen to him, by which point he's got some real humdingers saved up and drops them on her, which creates a downward cycle that does bad things for her desire to hear from Dazarel, OR
2) Kakara specifically commits concentration and energy (i.e. action points) to improving her relationship with Dazarel to the point where the dragon is no longer shouting hateful crap at her, OR
3) Kakara starts exhibiting symptoms similar to depression or schizophrenia, because "has a voice in your head that hates you and thinks everything sucks" is a pretty good summary of what depression and schizophrenia are like.

It's like, having a situation where by default we interact with someone and notice their attitude, then have to invest in actions to improve their attitude works when dealing with a sibling who starts out loving us and gradually cools if not talked to. It doesn't work so well, at least for the purpose of 'not imposing costs on Kakara' when dealing with an entity that actively hates us.

A second point to make, Kakara choosing she doesn't want running commentary does not necessarily mean she will sensory deprive him. She can cancel his ability to snide at her without making him blind to the world. If he still wishes to be a jerk afterwards and doesn't want to talk, that is his choice but we are not as cruel as to put him in a box. And seeing from our eyes might help him grow attached even if he doesn't want to talk.
Maybe so, maybe not. I'm not going to assume it will help by default without us having to do any hard work.

Besides, if the self option wins, I want to spend actions on him. Because of the reasons at the begining of this post. Besides, if you really think that people are voting on this for extra power, which would probably require interacting with Dazzarel to access, wouldn't that mean they would vote to interact with him?
My point is, the self option has a much worse risk/reward payoff IF we don't spend AP on interacting with Dazarel.

Maybe we'll choose to do that, and maybe we won't. But since we can't predict in advance whether we'll vote to socialize Dazarel to the exclusion of whatever else is on offer... that's a possible flaw in plans that rely on us, personally, socializing Dazarel next year.
 
Actually, wouldn't that depend on how you interpret "somewhat" and "middling"? I've known people to use "middling" to instead mean "very little", which is inaccurate, but if that's what you're used to, then that's how you'd likely interpret it.

Not saying it's accurate mind, but I can see how it might have come about.
Off Google:
mid·dling
ˈmidliNG/
adjective
adjective: middling
  1. 1.​
    moderate or average in size, amount, or rank.
    "the village contained no poor households but a lot of middling ones"
    synonyms: average, standard, normal, middle-of-the-road; More
    moderate, ordinary, commonplace, everyday, workaday, tolerable, passable;
    run-of-the-mill, fair, mediocre, undistinguished, unexceptional, unremarkable;
    informalOK, so-so, 'comme ci, comme ça', fair-to-middling, plain-vanilla
    "a town of the middling kind, neither rich nor poor"
    • neither very good nor very bad.
      "he had had a fair to middling season"
    • informal
      (of a person) in reasonably good but not perfect health.
noun
plural noun: middlings; noun: middling
  1. 1.​
    bulk goods of medium grade, especially flour of medium fineness.
adverb
informaldated

adverb: middling
  1. 1.​
    fairly or moderately.
    "middling rich"
 
We knew from the beginning when we left Earth and fled for Garenhuld there were other saiyans in the galaxy. Not every saiyan came with us when we left for Garenhuld three hundred years ago.
Uju, that is the second time you mentioned this... but that isn't the case. All surviving Z fighter descendants came to Garenhuld. The only ones who didn't where the androids, who were already off planet and Majin Buu.
 
one measily power outage and I come back to this...?

dear god in heaven
Then Why doesn't it happen more often?

Why do we Have Beerus?

Why didn't Dazrael do it earlier


Seriously, Can I get some word of GM in here? What are the exact Physics behind using Ki to nuke planets, Im legitimately curious now.
Mostly because people like living on planets/like using their resources, which they would lack if they destroyed it.

Beerus, on the other hand, is supposed to destroy universal threats and dangerous civilizations/species. He's actually kind of bad at it.

as for the physics, all you gotta do is aim a blast of sufficient strength downwards. I believe the minimum point for an Earth-like planet hangs around 20,000, but don't quote me on that.

admittedly, a nonfocused planet buster that devastates the world is normally less effective against peer opponents then a planet buster that's focused and wastes little energy in big detonations and showy domes of light, so yeah
Like, I know they should be capable of it, it's just...

Fucking Christ Toriyama!
if you think this is hell, consider what Poptart and I go through in figuring out things like 'what the fuck is with genetics in this universe' and 'how the fuck does the divine bureaucracy work'

its aweful
 
In response to the whole planet destruction thing, just remember that it takes "five minutes" for a planet to explode.
 
Uju, that is the second time you mentioned this... but that isn't the case. All surviving Z fighter descendants came to Garenhuld. The only ones who didn't where the androids, who were already off planet and Majin Buu.
There were other saiyans.

Do you not remember the Broly Movie?
if you think this is hell, consider what Poptart and I go through in figuring out things like 'what the fuck is with genetics in this universe' and 'how the fuck does the divine bureaucracy work'

its aweful
Honestly, you're the one who brought up the Option that lead to these pages and pages of War.

In like a day I'll feel more sympathetic, but right now, for all this typing, Your time of Judgement has come Monado :V

In response to the whole planet destruction thing, just remember that it takes "five minutes" for a planet to explode.
"Do you know how long a Minute is?"

"Wha-?! Of course I do!"

"Because I'm not so sure Mr. Toriyama sir."
 
Thank you, but I think you are reading more into it than it says.
It doesn't say anything about letting him out of the seal, or letting him possess bodies. It's not Naruto.
There's a reason why Head Dragon is harsher than Chibi.

Uju, that is the second time you mentioned this... but that isn't the case. All surviving Z fighter descendants came to Garenhuld. The only ones who didn't where the androids, who were already off planet and Majin Buu.
Do we actually know this? Was it stated?
Because this is what's in the histories:
Son Mato was infuriated. The constant onslaught of enemies -- perhaps, even, the Enemy -- had come to Earth only because the Galactic King had offered them up as his shield against a populace he lacked and had always lacked the strength to rule. Earth was dead because of this weak being's deception.

The King begged Mato to stay, and keep the Galaxy stable with his newfound strength. Mato refused, filled with anger and contempt, and took the Exiles away.The Exiles fled, far into the Galactic East, where the rebellions were thickest and the rule of law lay lightest. They fled further, into the far edges of the galaxy where stars are few and far between and even those isolated points on the road to the edge of the galaxy are rarely inhabited. They fled, searching for a place to settle where they could stay hidden forever.
Would we know if anyone stayed behind?
Especially given that it's explicitly stated that the Garenhuld Saiyans lost a fair chunk of their history in the Dark Age?
Point of order: we had very good reason to think that all living saiyans not part of the Exile refugee flotilla were dead, because they either made it to the ships and fled Earth, or died with Earth. We had no compelling reason to assume there were survivors elsewhere, since I don't think we even knew for sure if Tarble was canon.
Why is the assumption that every Saiyan descendant of the Z-fighters would automatically live on Earth? Wouldn't be travelling?
Move away for one reason or another, especially at the time when Earth was beset on all sides prior to Son Gohan becoming a god?
Or even that every Saiyan was automatically living on their original planet when it got blown up?
 
[X] Seal him in a less imposing physical body, with his powers sealed as well (somewhat harsh, renders him almost completely harmless while still giving him physical freedom. Implement chibi Dazarel).
 
[folds arms]

Tell me, did you READ what I had to say about the sorcerors maybe being wrong? Or did you just skim it and accidentally misrepresent it in a mocking fashion?

Because I was very explicit about the fact that I believe the sorcerors are intelligent, competent, and that their opinion is a considerable reassurance that permanently put to rest some of my doubts. My continued skepticism was based entirely on the fact that the sorcerors are mere mortals and can be wrong (and for that matter even the gods themselves are hilariously fallible in Dragonball). I explicitly compared them to groups I approve of on the whole, such as engineers.


Oh no, THAT is how I read your argument. But that was after Poptart went out of his way to point out that it was closer to a two plus two situation instead of higher mathematics and you explained that while the sorcerers are as sure as it is possible for them to be, there were cases before in which a paradigm shift caused "truths" in science to be questioned, which is admitedly a good argument.

However, that came after several pages of arguing how complicated the sealing procedure actually was, whether it was a new thing to try or not and whether we could afford our experts being wrong. The conclusion reached would not cause the evolution I referred by itself but it doesn't change the fact that what led to it were several pages of argument regarding whether we could trust how sure they could be about that and the conclusion reached was that people are falible, even in things regarded as truth. Since I don't see Kakara suddenly questioning all fields of science in that way and since she does have a prior example of a magical spell going hilariously wrong when supercharged, it is not so out there that the several pages of discussion might cause an evolution that would let her to be distrustful of sorcery. Not in a "they don't know what they are doing" way but in a "I rather rely in other things since I don't understand this and I can't know how right they are about what they take as fact" as a result of the, again, several pages in which that took prominence.

Just like I can't be sure if an evolution to the ambitious trait into something like power hungry would come from choosing to seal the dragon within ourselves or from the several pages of people against it arguing that we chose to seal him within ourselves just to gain more power despite other arguments being made. We have seen that discussion influences Kakara's thought process and that the amount of discussion for a certain argument makes it more likely to be the reason in the update. So, if it is constantly said that Kakara wants to seal Dazz inside herself because more power, then the reason she would think in the update is that she wants more power while if it were that it allows her constant interaction with him it would be constant interaction with him. Which is a reason to be annoyed when people focus on a single point of an argument to the exclusion of others.

Similarly, if we have one post in which we reach a conclusion (or, in this case, in which it is finally clear what your argument against it is) but several pages of arguing about it and people taking it as distrust of magic solution (whether they are for or against it) which spans through several updates, it does seem more reasonable that said discussion becomes part of her thought process since you are not the only one who took part of it but several players. More importantly, if a reason not to vote for sealing him inside her is "sorcerers are human and falible and might be mistaken about the paradigm or new information might change how they view magic later" then it makes sense that, what is taken from that is "I rather seal him in a lower form because i am afraid they might be mistaken despite their reassurances" which given her initial distrust for sorcery and priors encounters for it might cause a major distrust for sorcery; even if that is not the intention of said argument.

Plus, as you have pointed out before, I think, we can't really predict how her traits will develope, citing Protector and the results of Garenhuld II. Thus what I meant was that, if your argument was that we can't really predict how traits will develope but this is a pivotal moment in which ambitious is the more visible trait and thus it is likely that if we choose an option that uses ambitious it is likely to be the trait that developes then, by that same argument, if we don't choose the ambitious option and one of the arguments against choosing said option, which involved several pages, was fear that they might be wrong anyways then that combined with a previous character trait against sorcery has as much chance to evolve into a further anti sorcery trait. Since they both use an argument during the vote as a reason even if it wasn't the only argument and both have to do with an already existing character trait.

So basically I am against "it might develope a power hungry trait" as an argument for not choosing chibi since you could also with a similar reasoning make a "it might cause a distrust sorcery trait" argument in favor of not voting against the ambitious option. Saying "it might evolve our ambitious trait" doesn't seem to me like a fair argument to make. The reply was meant to be in the context of whether a choice might cause a trait evolution, not an attack against you.

This doesn't really seem like my day. A lot of things I say end up taken as meaning different things than I meant today.
 
This doesn't really seem like my day. A lot of things I say end up taken as meaning different things than I meant today.
I know that feel man.

In terms of the trait, I highly doubt it will give us power hungry straight up, but it does look like it would direct us down that as a potential path, alongside some others.
 
Last edited:
Was in class for a few hours, and now we have a dumpster fire of a thread (in the smelly shit I burning in a controlled ish way), had a mod vist (for something that feels like it happened ages ago), and really haven't made more progress on convincing each other (but are getting more and more sucked into fighting).


Still find Simon's callback to his engineers example as to why we can't trust the sorcerers about the seal to be hilarious* (unless he made another example since -- thread is moving really fast)

But really at this point, both sides have dug in and are shooting at each other. They've got points that they care about (either in the benefits of their option, or their dislike of the other) and no arguments by anyone will change them at this point.

I'm just glad the fear mongering has died down.


*Although that's probably more of a measure of how bad my week has been that I got that much enjoyment out of it.
Adhoc vote count started by Blonddude42 on Mar 2, 2018 at 8:10 PM, finished with 774 posts and 113 votes.
 
I expect at least a sentence in Kakara's thought process next update to be about how much of a mental back and forth it took her to decide among those two options.
Hahahahaha.

But yeah; having read all of the posts (or almost, apparently) since the update, The same arguments have gone around time and time again...

But never got a satisfactory answer to *****, or ********.

....:p
 
Voting is open
Back
Top