He.
I am a guy, I've said it multiple times. It's on my default avatar.
What's it with 'they'?
Last edited:
He.
It's the closest thing English has to a gender-neutral pronoun (other than 'it', which usually conveys some degree of insult, given that particular pronoun also covers inanimate objects).
It's the closest thing English has to a gender-neutral pronoun (other than 'it', which usually conveys some degree of insult, given that particular pronoun also covers inanimate objects).
Sure. I'm not a big user of harsh words here though - at least when referring to users.As far as I'm concerned, what two or more people of consenting age (which is 13 in Japan, I think) get up to in private is between them and their conscience, even if they are related.
Now may I suggest we talk about something less controversial before harsh words are exchanged? I'm in no mood for that sort of thing right now.
Couldn't remember. Also never noticed before now that the default avatars vary by gender...He.
I am a guy, I've said it multiple times. It's my default avatar.
What's it with 'they'?
'It' is more for objects. 'They' is plural or gender-neutral.It's the closest thing English has to a gender-neutral pronoun (other than 'it', which usually conveys some degree of insult, given that particular pronoun also covers inanimate objects).
As a final thingy to make my stance more clear tho: Just because I find it distasteful doesn't mean I would support any kind of in-universe prevention and if Stryp wants to do an incest route then fine for him. I don't like it, and will frequently say as much, but fine.
Pretty much the arrangement we've had with the French for years and it's done wonders for our relationship.Let's agree to disagree, yes. And as long as you will be disagreeing with an 'incest' route, I will argue, if only for the sake of an argument.
Pardon me, but I'm not much on medieval history, if that's what you're referring to. If you want to, enlighten me, I'll be grateful. If not, just as fine, I'll go soak in a tub.Pretty much the arrangement we've had with the French for years and it's done wonders for our relationship.
Pardon me, but I'm not much on medieval history, if that's what you're referring to. If you want to, enlighten me, I'll be grateful. If not, just as fine, I'll go soak in a tub.
There's still argumentum ad baculum!Don't get so worked up, when you reach ad Hominem fallacies it means you have nothing left to resort to.
Aren't you guys, like, only cousin-related due to the angles, saxons and jutes from your side and the franks, alani and burgundi from the french side? (Unless we speak of Wales and Brittany, then fair enough).
It's not a cousins thing, it's a friendly rivalry thing.Aren't you guys, like, only cousin-related due to the angles, saxons and jutes from your side and the franks, alani and burgundi from the french side? (Unless we speak of Wales and Brittany, then fair enough).
Friendly familiar rivalry?
Speak for yourself. I'm rational but still warm and fuzzy.He did call himself a chemist. Hard science guys, like me, are cold and rational people.
Only if you want to.
I don't think "Needs of the many," is the right tac here. If it came down to saving Shinji or Asuka versus saving bus of random strangers, I believe that the only hesitation might be because she fears their disapproval.I can actually see this happen... believe it or not. Take a moment to think, If placed in a no-win scenario where she must save herself or Asuka/ and or Shinji, what would be the right choice? If we think for a moment, a very legendary film placed a equally logic-minded character in a similar dilemma...
Spock: Ship... out of danger?
Kirk: Yes...
Spock: Don't grieve... Admiral... its logical. The needs of the many... outweigh...
Kirk: The needs of the few...
Spock: Or the one... I never took... the Kobayashi Maru Test... until now. What did you think of my solution?
Kirk: Spock...
Spock: I have been... and always shall be... your friend. Live long, and prosper.
So, while it might bring tears if it were to happen... remember, "Not all tears are evil..."
Ah, but that's only single variable! We must consider multivariable simultaneous equations! Shinji and Asuka view any of those three outcomes (A+S !R, S+R !A, or A+R !S) as unacceptable, and by the point where such a sacrifice might be made, Rei would also be aware that her loves would consider losing her an unacceptable outcome.Actually that math gets very simple by eliminating one variable. You're right in so far as they would all rally and fight like the Dickens, but what if Shinji or Asuka was in mortal danger? How far would Rei go in that case? To her calculus, Shinji+Rei-Asuka is unacceptable. Similarly Asuka+Rei-Shinji is a non-starter. But Shinji+Asuka-Rei... Not ideal on many levels, but orders of magnitude better than options A or B.
I don't think "Needs of the many," is the right tac here. If it came down to saving Shinji or Asuka versus saving bus of random strangers, I believe that the only hesitation might be because she fears their disapproval.
Ah, but that's only single variable! We must consider multivariable simultaneous equations! Shinji and Asuka view any of those three outcomes (A+S !R, S+R !A, or A+R !S) as unacceptable, and by the point where such a sacrifice might be made, Rei would also be aware that her loves would consider losing her an unacceptable outcome.
We've seen what happens when Shinji starts going "Give her back", we know that Gendo is what happens when somebody gets stuck in "Give her back" mode for years, so what happens if Shinji and Asuka hit "Give her back" at the same time?
I have no idea, but I'd be morbidly curious and want to watch from a safe distance. Like, say, Mars.
"Oh yeah. You're welcome, Rei. I especially liked #7, #12, and #18. Man, #18!"
I can actually see this happen... believe it or not. Take a moment to think, If placed in a no-win scenario where she must save herself or Asuka/ and or Shinji, what would be the right choice? If we think for a moment, a very legendary film placed a equally logic-minded character in a similar dilemma...
Spock: Ship... out of danger?
Kirk: Yes...
Spock: Don't grieve... Admiral... its logical. The needs of the many... outweigh...
Kirk: The needs of the few...
Spock: Or the one... I never took... the Kobayashi Maru Test... until now. What did you think of my solution?
Kirk: Spock...
Spock: I have been... and always shall be... your friend. Live long, and prosper.
So, while it might bring tears if it were to happen... remember, "Not all tears are evil..."
Point duly noted, but please don't Man of Steel into this... I hated the movie. If that wasn't your intent... I'm sorry for misunderstanding in advance. So, I guess I'll amend my previous statement by adding, "But sometimes, the needs of the few outweigh the needs of the many".... a most illogical statement, but thank you Search for Spock.
In short: Case by Case basis.
.... If that happens and both want Rei back, you wouldn't be able to tell Earth and Mars apart from space by sight alone. Note: when I made my reply, it wasn't about how Asuka and Shinji would react to such a situation, but rather that we have precedence of how an Open Up Rei would react to a situation where failure would mean Shinji's death (OG TV Series, Manga, and 2.0 confirm this... Rei will remove herself from the equation if it meant Shinji will live). However, given the fact we aren't using 2.0's material (including Pseudo-Awakening), we don't have the threat of Shinji and Asuka triggering Third Impact... or do we?
Personally, I treat everything in 1.0 and 2.0 as "Stuff NERV had or was possible in the OG timeline, but didn't have/ happen because of butterfly ripple shenanigans", but I digress.
Finally... am I one of the rare few not waving the OT3 flag? I'm quite content waiting for A&T to end before we get the Alternate Israfel Special Route... I guess I'll sit in my corner then.
Another thought: Pretty much everyone in the Eva cast, and very much our three favorite Pilots all have a bad case of "I'm a bad person who doesn't deserve happiness, not as much as the people I care about do. I will give up my happiness to protect theirs if I need to.' And yes, that includes Rei. Pretty much all three of them would hesitate very little to sacrifice themselves to protect the others. We have hit the point where Asuka would do that for Rei as well as Shinji. She would really prefer to live long and happily, but even the Second Child is willing to face doom head on to protect the two that mean everything to her.Ah, but that's only single variable! We must consider multivariable simultaneous equations! Shinji and Asuka view any of those three outcomes (A+S !R, S+R !A, or A+R !S) as unacceptable, and by the point where such a sacrifice might be made, Rei would also be aware that her loves would consider losing her an unacceptable outcome.
We've seen what happens when Shinji starts going "Give her back", we know that Gendo is what happens when somebody gets stuck in "Give her back" mode for years, so what happens if Shinji and Asuka hit "Give her back" at the same time?
Whoa Nellie... That's a crack pairing I haven't seen yet. Though knowing the internet, it won't be far off. :/
Funny, but since the backups take a minimum of several hours to several days for the full ones, that's not very practical. This also assumes a ready supply from the Reiquarium, though Ritsuko is not likely to flush that like she did in canon anymore. Her anger is not really aimed at Rei anymore."So, so glad I convinced Dr. Akagi to upgrade the regimen to full backups every other day instead of monthly partial copies... what did miss?"
i'm pretty sure the 446-page long thread was a more obvious indication...I guess it means I'm doing something right if it provokes such a strong response?
You are possibly correct -- English is not my mother language.
Picture of underage after-sex: Not ok.
Written implications of underage after-sex: Ok.
Makes sense to me.