Remove ads

Paths of Civilization

Reader mode
[X] [Inno] Looks important, invest heavily (-3 Wealth, -3 Mysticism, -1 Tech, ???)
[X] [AG] Subsidize their involvement (Open games, -1 Wealth income per participant, increased innovation, ???)
[X] [Policy] Switch to Mass Levy
[X] [Kick] 2 Stability, 4 Temp Econ damage
[X] [Trade] Smiths work overtime! (-2 Tech/turn but can meet demand for trade)
 
Last edited:
If we are opening up the games (and it looks like we are), that means we shouldn't expect to remain more technologically advanced than our pear

Not that that is unreasonable. After all, doubling our wealth costs means we can't actually take much innovation actions anyways.
 
Sivantic said:
Why are we not charging for the games?

We need the wealth more than the diplo.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
We have +8 wealth gen. At this point, diplo and wealth are equal, because with diplo maxed, it flows into wealth without the stigma of us having charged for their presence in our games. Acting in good faith will do far more to protect our interests than an extra charge would.
 
PrimalShadow said:
If we are opening up the games (and it looks like we are), that means we shouldn't expect to remain more technologically advanced than our pear

Not that that is unreasonable. After alldoubling our wealth costs means we can't actually take much innovation actions anyways.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
It does mention that our tech base is centered on infrastructure that can't be reproduced just be looking at the results. As such, it's more likely we will steal more tech then they will steal of ours.
 
PrimalShadow said:
If we are opening up the games (and it looks like we are), that means we shouldn't expect to remain more technologically advanced than our pear

Not that that is unreasonable. After alldoubling our wealth costs means we can't actually take much innovation actions anyways.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Plus our traders are suppressing innovation rolls so we might as well ride on their coattails for a short while. Also tying in two other expansionist Great Powers into closer friendship is always a wise move.
 
Last edited:
PrimalShadow said:
If we are opening up the games (and it looks like we are), that means we shouldn't expect to remain more technologically advanced than our pear

Not that that is unreasonable. After all, doubling our wealth costs means we can't actually take much innovation actions anyways.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
We currently suck at keeping our tech to ourselves. At least this way we can suck it up from our neighbors as well.
 
PrimalShadow said:
If we are opening up the games (and it looks like we are), that means we shouldn't expect to remain more technologically advanced than our pear

Not that that is unreasonable. After all, doubling our wealth costs means we can't actually take much innovation actions anyways.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Remember the tech spread towards us will be much faster than the tech spread outwards from us due to us having far more opportunity to poach their artisans and examine the competition creations in detail.
 
Citino said:
It does mention that our tech base is centered on infrastructure that can't be reproduced just be looking at the results. As such, it's more likely we will steal more tech then they will steal of ours.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Additionally, one of the targets doesn't have intrigue, while we do.

Not sure about the Storm Ymaryn, I think they split after we got it?
 
PrimalShadow said:
If we are opening up the games (and it looks like we are), that means we shouldn't expect to remain more technologically advanced than our pear

Not that that is unreasonable. After all, doubling our wealth costs means we can't actually take much innovation actions anyways.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

We're switching to a more infrastructure-heavy playstyle recently in any case. And if we're going to be technological equals, we've already leveraged our initial advantages in tech and innovation to develop an obscene population advantage.
 
[X] [Inno] Looks important, invest heavily (-3Wealth, -3 Mysticism, -1 Tech, ???)
[X] [AG] They may join (Open games, ???)
[X] [Policy] Switch to Mass Levy
[X] [Kick] No kick
[X] [Trade] Push the guilds to the limit to meet demands (Trade Tech for Wealth, up to 5 per phase, to attempt to top up Wealth)
 
@Academia Nut

Can we make the paper industry (if it was born) completely owned by the government as we are the sole sponsor? Some direct leverage into our internal network and secured paper source would be nice.
 
[X] [Inno] Looks important, invest heavily (-3 Wealth, -3 Mysticism, -1 Tech, ???)
[X] [AG] Subsidize their involvement (Open games, -1 Wealth income per participant, increased innovation, ???)
[X] [Policy] Switch to Mass Levy
[X] [Kick] No kick
[X] [Trade] Smiths work overtime! (-2Tech/turn but can meet demand for trade)
 
Last edited:
Reader mode
You must login or register to reply here.
Remove ads
Back
Top