- Location
- Voidbetweenstars
*See's everyone voting to make the gods political.*
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24202/242029bcb7122f4defee6060fac7f42ec034dead" alt="Facepalm :facepalm: :facepalm:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24202/242029bcb7122f4defee6060fac7f42ec034dead" alt="Facepalm :facepalm: :facepalm:"
Not just because it was free. It had a bit of priority since we had a Mysticism drain at the time. It was a cheap (1 secondary and no cost) way of refilling a Mysticism, plus it had a chain bonus. It's expensive now and isn't ideal as a filler action.That was back when it was free. Since it costs wealth now there is an argument supporting the idea that the opportunity cost has shifted enough that they won't take it.
We have also been told they don't disrupt true cities, sigh. I see where this is going though. I can only really hope that the provinces will take actions focused on getting the megaproject through.Sure, but we have WoG it prioritizes new settlements. And since we have three spots for them, it's unlikely to take expand econ soon.
Which... I'm fine with. I don't mind losing a true city. Since Best of the Best/currency one true city has been enough to refund almost all actions fully. And we really need to generate some econ slots soon.
The only time it did that was how the Sacred Warding needed a holy site in every settlement (and thus a new settlement would need another holy site)Also, new provinces might cause the megaproject to take longer. It has before.
*does a quick number run in my head*
This is fine with me.
Also balanced may not be my preferred but it's already picked up steam so I'll just go with it.
If it's always been a thing why hasn't it happen before?
Peaceful Transition of Power is a big deal.If the kingship of the immortal can change, doesn't this support the idea that the current king can be changed/removed before his lifetime of service is up?
Or may lead to periodic/special elections when circumstances change. We've certainly been stuck with a heroic Martial king when we just didn't need him.
That is a horrible argument, you should definitely try to alter it to something else and at least vote for the preferred action for you unless the alternative is decidedly negative.Also balanced may not be my preferred but it's already picked up steam so I'll just go with it.
Maybe, but that is not necessary a bad thing. Sometimes it might even be needed.If the kingship of the immortal can change, doesn't this support the idea that the current king can be changed/removed before his lifetime of service is up?
Or lead to heroic martial becoming king every time were at warOr may lead to periodic/special elections when circumstances change. We've certainly been stuck with a heroic Martial king when we just didn't need him.
Yeah, i'm not sure whether it will actually count as "the south" helping, as opposed to "oh hey, more people the South rely on to fight their battles" I asked @Academia Nut in an earlier post whether it would, but i think i forgot to tag him instead of just replying to his post, and tagging him seems to make it easier for him to notice questionsYou ever think that people might want a royal presence to show unity?
Edit: sorry, that was snippier than it was meant to be.
Or may lead to periodic/special elections when circumstances change. We've certainly been stuck with a heroic Martial king when we just didn't need him.
It's a thing of human societies.
We can always hope.Or lead to heroic martial becoming king every time were at war![]()
Unlikely considering how the system seems to work at the moment.Or may lead to periodic/special elections when circumstances change. We've certainly been stuck with a heroic Martial king when we just didn't need him.
I think it's more important that the government focus on the climate change, to show that its playing its part in the greater whole, i.e. like in a symphony.You ever think that people might want a royal presence to show unity?
Edit: sorry, that was snippier than it was meant to be.
So why are you trying to make it easier for people to take it?It's a thing of human societies.
If someone wants power bad enough and is dissatisfied they will take it.
We've just had a clever system of meritocracy in play that keeps that from happening.
Also I would like to direct everyone's attention to this. This cannot be stressed enough, we have already refused to give the priesthood more power, why would we, just one update later, suddenly change our minds?
Your forgetting them wanting to kill the man who gave us iron.
Unlikely considering how the system seems to work at the moment.
Elections lead to people holding the office for life, the idea that they can be removed will probably first be explored via coups or forcing a king out for political greed considering human nature. You are optimistic, which is good, but in politics, which in Ymar is becoming more and more cutthroat, that isn't going to work.
We've already had political assassinations, repression of others and our main way to enforce order is to kill a bunch of people. Don't add to that by putting in the idea that the king can be removed from office