Because fully grown forests fuck over Nomad attacks by being a obstacle they can't move their fucking chariots through. Thus gives us a big defensive advantage.[] [Main] New Settlement - Bleeding Cliffs
[] [Secondary] Support Subordinate - Stallion Tribes
[] [Secondary] Survey Lands
Why do people want to do expand forests so much I don't see the point?
You're just rewording your stance while ignoring the issue I brought up. The forests will be useless if they come back next turn. The marches will likely be ground down to nothing, with our core settlements being invaded. This will result in even harsher capitulation if not outright fragmentation.>.>
Also, what action do you think the Stallion Tribes is going to take with their Econ 3 Martial 1? I'm betting on Main Chariots, which puts them at Martial 5. I think they are fine.
We have to start sometime. Better to plant them now, then wait until later and have to wait until even later again.
Mwah! Thanks! I'll redo it and repost.
March will do Chariots and get to Martial 5. We must take care of long term if they are stuck with short term.You're just rewording your stance while ignoring the issue I brought up. The forests will be useless if they come back next turn. The marches will likely be ground down to nothing, with our core settlements being invaded. This will result in even harsher capitulation if not outright fragmentation.
If we plant the forest now and they come back next turn, we will at least have a thicker forest in their way and some econ. If we plant the forest now and they don't come back next turn, we will have a thicc forest as a future defense.You're just rewording your stance while ignoring the issue I brought up. The forests will be useless if they come back next turn. The marches will likely be ground down to nothing, with our core settlements being invaded. This will result in even harsher capitulation if not outright fragmentation.
Gives us material for housing, defensive structures and charcoal, helps with the economy, Terra Preta, hunting and gathering, there is strategic value against enemy chariots, and it sends a fucking message.Why do people want to do expand forests so much I don't see the point?
Oh, so not really something required then?They think of themselves as the frontline of the People, not really as a separate group.
Yeah but expand forests take multiple turns to be an actual hindrance. See how the ST's forests only slightly slowing them down when it was one of their first actions .Because fully grown forests fuck over Nomad attacks by being a obstacle they can't move their fucking chariots through. Thus gives us a big defensive advantage.
Keep in mind that this virtually guarantees that one of our provinces will raid the nomads - it only leaves one econ available for them to build troops for us this turn.I'm fine with this vote, as much as i'd like a bigger transfer.
Alright then.[X] [Main] Expand Forests
[X] [Secondary] Study Forests
[X] [Secondary] Proclaim Glory
Science needs love too ._.
March will do Chariots and get to Martial 5. We must take care of long term if they are stuck with short term.
Forests don't grow in 1 turn (full or not)...we've seen this when we planted forests before. A turn passed and the trees were still too young.If we plant the forest now and they come back next turn, we will at least have a thicker forest in their way and some econ. If we plant the forest now and they don't come back next turn, we will have a thicc forest as a future defense.
When we're actually doing quite well economically and militarily, it's an excellent means of building up a periphery fast. They do need support sometimes. It also lets us drop our military if it's getting too high.If the above is not the case and we actually do transfer only 1 econ/martial, it's a horrible action and we should never take Support Subordinate manually.
Is that if they come or if they don't? While either way, something's better than anything, forests can become pretty thick in 2-3 decades. And even if they attacked right after we finished planting seedlings and scattering acorns, it's likely that the thing poles of the saplings would provide some barriers. Plus we could just dig a shitton of holes and ditches that we plan on putting black soil in, later, but which will serve as barriers against future attack.Forests don't grow in 1 turn (full or not)...we've seen this when we planted forests before. A turn passed and the trees were still too young.
Directly defending them is a more effective way of doing the former. (Unless they're not being attacked and yet we absolutely need them to build up immediately)When we're actually doing quite well economically and militarily, it's an excellent means of building up a periphery fast. They do need support sometimes. It also lets us drop our military if it's getting too high.
where should we expand the forest, if the former? Just ST in general??@Academia Nut Do we have to specify where we expand the forest, or is it going to be done in the Marches?