@Academia Nut made a statement previously about "special effects" if Stability is at 3 from the start to the end of a turn. No temporary drops even if its made up in the mid-turn. No raising it during the turn. Start high, end high.I like the summation veekie but this is an assumption, where is your basis?
That's why we're setting a precedent here. If it scores a Honor value or evolves Humility(personally thats an evolution), then it gives the context.Also, for Reinforcing Social and Subjective Fairness through establishing a precedent of recusing yourself from family related concerns. Are we sure our People are knowlageable enough to get this kinda thing? They are smart enough, but do they have the context?
That's why this is creating the concept of a conflict of interest, once Magwyna passes on and her son continues working as Clerk Chief, people will be able to see for themselves that he remains a perfectly good candidate.We were very deliberate in every choice so far, in order to make it so your heritage isn't the sole defining factor to your prospects.
And here we are, this close to going all the way around and becoming what we swore to fight.
@veekie The concept of "conflict of interests" is more or less non-existent in the People, as per WoG. So some of your points in Pro-Generic aren't valid.
This does not answer my question veeks. Where are you getting your basis that a drop in Legitimacy also pulls down Stability with it? Even if Legitimacy could drop to 2, could Stability not stay at 3?@Academia Nut made a statement previously about "special effects" if Stability is at 3 from the start to the end of a turn. No temporary drops even if its made up in the mid-turn. No raising it during the turn. Start high, end high.
I mean him getting it on with his mom's wives isn't that big a deal... I mean His mom is straight, the wives are purely political so who cares? His mom certainly doesn'tPersonally the inability for the hero to keep it in his pants is THE downside to elect him. If he is already making babies with his mom's wifes, then it's not a stretch to think his tendencies will escalate to other people's wifes. Hero mom already have this concern and I'm completely against the guy from becoming king.
Yeah, that's where I see the rub in this argument. Academia Nut has specifically said that Magwyna not speaking up for her son would be viewed as her seeing some horrible secret trait he has, not that she'd explain her decision to anyone else in context of trying to avoid hereditary rule or conflict of interest.That's why we're setting a precedent here. If it scores a Honor value or evolves Humility(personally thats an evolution), then it gives the context.
Those Thunder Horse city states are way too quick in their conquest, we should act now to stop the snowball from getting any bigger. Also, the i can't agree with the flirty hero.
[X] Attack Thunder Speakers to stop border raids (Declares war with goal of stopping attacks, Highlanders will join, likely brings in Thunder Horse and Xohyssiri)
[X] Remain quiet (Next king is probably standard)
I'm actually contemplating that on a Diplo crit he may solve our Marcher problem by marrying Attrikwyn's daughter or something.I mean him getting it on with his mom's wives isn't that big a deal... I mean His mom is straight, the wives are purely political so who cares? His mom certainly doesn't
Or just knock her up >.> boom problem solved ^.^I'm actually contemplating that on a Diplo crit he may solve our Marcher problem by marrying Attrikwyn's daughter or something.
That'd give me giggle fits for days.
Those who knew her stood for her. In here you're asking her to deny him that which was essential for her own admittance to chiefdome
More fearmongering. Keeping quiet is now a deliberate smear campaign.
Oh and now you reduce it to personal insults as well, how cute.
There is that. However their initial thoughts were that he could be a great heir. His own abilities would shine forth, just like they did with his mother. She had to work against it as well and made it work with zero help from anyone. She made her own contacts, she fought on her own ballot.
That is the point of the meritocracy.
Yeah, that's where I see the rub in this argument. Academia Nut has specifically said that Magwyna not speaking up for her son would be viewed as her seeing some horrible secret trait he has, not that she'd explain her decision to anyone else in context of trying to avoid hereditary rule or conflict of interest.
There is no real chance for a 'positive' precedent to be set or trait to be earned if people just assume her son is a secretly a creep. And in fact the reason Magwyna would not articulate any ideas about condemning her son 'on principle' is that it would be viewed as an abhorrent act by our society. It's just way too out of context as a reasoning our people would value.
I hate to make the comparison, but reaching for this feels like reaching for 'fair' taxes, it's a noble sentiment taken way too far to the point it just ignores the reality of the situation. Any ideology taken too far blindly can be problematic.
I can't say no to a hero true, but I do not accept assholes. This hero's weakness to flesh killed off my vote. We are now at golden age, playing safe is the word to make the most of it. Heros are only useful in time of duress and stress.
That's such a hilariously terrible reason, I can't even argue against it since its illogical.I can't say no to a hero true, but I do not accept assholes. This hero's weakness to flesh killed off my vote. We are now at golden age, playing safe is the word to make the most of it. Heros are only useful in time of duress and stress.
Ideologies are meant to be absolute. People aren't meant to follow ideologies blindly, at least not good people.Ideology is by definition blind and absolute. Otherwise it's just a sentiment.
I can't say no to a hero true, but I do not accept assholes. This hero's weakness to flesh killed off my vote.
Ideologies are meant to be absolute. People aren't meant to follow ideologies blindly, at least not good people.
There's a reason the term originated during the Great Terror of the French Revolution.
Er... that's all our heroes bar cowpox guy. Remember how we got the secret of copper?
I see what you did there
...Ideologue is not a complimentary term. And no, one can genuinely support an ideology without being an ideologue.The ideologue follows the ideology.
People as you describe them would be sympathisers or neutrals.
and he did have to consider how he might have felt had someone demand that he bed another man in front of them to prove something.
It was something Attrikwyn was mulling over all the way home, (...) He would speak with his own wives as to their thoughts...