Just the opposite - the Stalliions want to return to the old way of doing things while the chiefs want to do something new to solve this Crisis.
Private property and Nomad Nepotism, the cherished values of the People...
Just the opposite - the Stalliions want to return to the old way of doing things while the chiefs want to do something new to solve this Crisis.
The way I see it, even assuming we make the optimal choices: (assuming "small chance" = 25%, "chance" = 50%)
Patryn: 25% chance of max success given correct choices, 0% chance of max failure. 75% chance of a situation we don't like but the state still owns the land and with a Harmony upgrade we should be able to take it away with the next tax reform.
There is nothing left to deal with the potential econ/stability losses, thus 0.5*0.5 = We only have a ~25% chance of succeeding anyway.
1-1=0 The horror.Snubbing has the chance of netting us -1 Stability and we're still not sure what the "hard decision" is if we don't solve the Crisis by the turn limit. I can imagine one scenario where the Stallions massacre the chiefs and set up a new heritary monarchy. But that's just one example - we just don't know.
Why did you quote me twice?
The point is for our polity- we're not going to affect the march either way, but for us we won't.That's as true as North Korea being a democracy. Technically it is, practically, it is anything but.
AN has stated that: For them Land is redistributed to family. To get it out of their hands, the state practically have to seize the land by claiming they're mismanaging it maliciously.
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
The point is for our polity- we're not going to affect the march either way, but for us we won't.
This is the Tax law for Land under their terms.The point is for our polity- we're not going to affect the march either way, but for us we won't.
The assignment of land management and the like passes down through family lines, although unassigned land is assigned by the local chiefs if a need arises.
Theoretically the community can force people out with cause if they are badly abusing the land they are assigned.
Private property and Nomad Nepotism, the cherished values of the People...
Yes, the heritage thing is adopted from the nomads/others but the private property thing passed down through families is a return to the old ways.
*raises finger*Yes, the heritage thing is adopted from the nomads/others but the private property thing passed down through families is a return to the old ways.
(Given the triple main requirement) We fail if either of them triggers. Thus, independent probabilities: the chance of two independent chances getting a specific choice is found by multiplying the probabilities together. The chance of two heads from two flips 25%.Where are you getting multiplying those two percentages together.
The point is that only the March has that as an integral part of their beliefs. We'll be assigning it that way but we won't have the nomad "Family First" value which makes it so hard to root out.
Yes, the heritage thing is adopted from the nomads/others but the private property thing passed down through families is a return to the old ways.
The point is that only the March has that as an integral part of their beliefs. We'll be assigning it that way but we won't have the nomad "Family First" value which makes it so hard to root out.
My face if that happens:I really hope we can resolve the crisis soon though.
We have hints that the environmental effects of plentiful rains and a pleasant climate that gave way to a baby boom are about to end. A drought would resonate with the crisis in all the wrong ways.
No it's not. We used to reassign land on a regular basis to get the best out of it.