- Location
- Sweden
[X] Get the intercession of the shamans to attempt to heal him (Wildcard)
[X] Plan STs are good enough
[X] Plan STs are good enough
Last edited:
We don't have a retirement option for chiefs, they all die and then someone inherits.Alternative analysis of options (mostly agrees with other ones, but I felt like posting something)
[] Speed his trip to the ancestors (Stability loss if plot unsuccessful)
Terrible precedent to assassinate a chief. High risk (stability) low gain (lose malus slightly earlier)
[] Hope the spirits intervene quickly (Malus to actions until the retirement/passing of the High Chief)
Best option. Remember he is a brilliant peace High Chief, suffering this malus reduce admin to good (all war actions would heavily suffer).
If he gets worse he will retire, the speed it appears to be progressing means a short wait.
[] Get the intercession of the shamans to attempt to heal him (Wildcard)
Unknown results (probably highly roll dependant). It is far to risky, gambling on a good roll. A crit success on this roll would be amazing (we start medicine) but an average roll would be no result and a poor result could be disastrous(High Chief thinks the Shamans are trying to kill him).
[] Retrieve war cart (Stops youngest son from hitting the Western Confederacy, boosts legitimacy and strength of a potential heir)
Preserves the Western Confederacy. Increase the chance of a good result for us. Possibly worthwhile
[] Attempt to retrieve star axe - Dead Priests (If the Dead Priests have the axe, attempts to get it away from them)
Very risky, the current malus from High Chief means it is unlikely to succeed. Acting to prevent the horrible situation of the Dead Priests having the axe. The Dead Priests are more likely to use the Nomads to complete the take over of the lowlands so even if the DPs have the axe we will have a turn to build lowland settlement+walls.
[] Attempt to retrieve star axe - Spirit Talkers (If the Spirit Talkers have the axe, attempts to get it away from them, multiple points of failure can trigger war with the Spirit Talkers)
Extremely high risk(war with Spirit Talkers) for the possibility of choosing the next chief. Worst option.
[] Support favourable heir (Boosts legitimacy of an heir, increases the odds of attacking the Dead Priests for the axe rather than negotiating)
Best option. Should result in the Nomads continuing to attack anyone but the People.
Plan Safest Vote:
Hope the spirits intervene quickly (Malus to actions until the retirement/passing of the High Chief)
Support favourable heir (Boosts legitimacy of an heir, increases the odds of attacking the Dead Priests for the axe rather than negotiating)
Only selecting one Nomad option significantly increases chance of success.
I would recommend Plan Little Hand with Hope the spirits intervene quickly
A solid way of splitting it. It assumes that choosing not to support an heir now means we'll eventually be given the option to support an heir, though. I furthermore don't recognize any difficulties that supporting the heir with the cart would offer. If the cart was enough to give an unfavored younger son a significant following, it will surely give great legitimacy to the heir. This means that the work that providing support to the heir would involve will be very little, if we give him the cart, and of a different nature than that required to retrieve either the cart or the axe.
It seems we have something;We don't have a retirement option for chiefs, they all die and then someone inherits.
Thus it was that the council found itself in a bind. Their High Chief was old and fading, but not yet sufficiently incapacitated that they could honourably retire him without issue, especially since his moments of forgetfulness were sporadic and uneven in intensity.
and? it's very nice shit.REMEMBER, UNLESS YOU VOTE TO ACTUALLY SUPPORT YOUR FAVORED HEIR, WE'RE BASICALLY JUST STEALING THE NOMADS SHIT!
Hmm. I just read the actual text that it lowers the success rate of all actions, and the text made it seem more certain that it lowered them regardless of how synergetic the different actions are. Before I was just going off of how different the resources dedicated to the different projects are, which is far more discriminatory in regards to the lowered success rate of different actions.Well, way I see it is:
[] Retrieve war cart (Stops youngest son from hitting the Western Confederacy, boosts legitimacy and strength of a potential heir)
Primary purpose:
-Remove the worst heir from the selection.
-Prevents raids on WC.
Secondary purpose:
-Boosts legitimacy of another heir if we choose it.
[] Attempt to retrieve star axe - Dead Priests (If the Dead Priests have the axe, attempts to get it away from them)
Primary purpose:
-Verify that the Dead Priests don't have the axe
Secondary purpose:
-Boosts legitimacy of another heir if we get it
[] Attempt to retrieve star axe - Spirit Talkers (If the Spirit Talkers have the axe, attempts to get it away from them, multiple points of failure can trigger war with the Spirit Talkers)
Primary purpose:
-Boost legitimacy of another heir if we get it.
[] Support favourable heir (Boosts legitimacy of an heir, increases the odds of attacking the Dead Priests for the axe rather than negotiating)
Primary purpose:
-Boost the difficulty of Dead Priests using the axe to control the Thunder Horse
Secondary purpose:
-Unify the the Thunder Horse under a favorable heir to us.
The problem here is that we take penalties for each action taken, and it's far more important to get the axe out of the Dead Priest hands than anything else.
Even if we unify the Thunder Horse under a favorable heir with the cart, the Dead Priests will continue to be able to bribe THEIR heir with the axe in the future, and so forth.
Wow, I really do not read closely enough. I assumed that since killing him was the listed option retirement isn't one. If we can retire him without issue why don't we do that rather than kill him? Who cares about honorable retirement when there's a chance that he'll forget something in a critical moment?It seems we have something;
Best case the High Chief realises he is forgetting things and retires asap.
The problem here is that we take penalties for each action taken, and it's far more important to get the axe out of the Dead Priest hands than anything else.
Even if we unify the Thunder Horse under a favorable heir with the cart, the Dead Priests will continue to be able to bribe THEIR heir with the axe in the future, and so forth.
REMEMBER, UNLESS YOU VOTE TO ACTUALLY SUPPORT YOUR FAVORED HEIR, WE'RE BASICALLY JUST STEALING THE NOMADS SHIT!
It appears we can only retire him for being obviously ill/failing his duties. Doing a good job but having the occasional memory lapse(making a few mistakes) is not something he can be retired for.Wow, I really do not read closely enough. I assumed that since killing him was the listed option retirement isn't one. If we can retire him without issue why don't we do that rather than kill him? Who cares about honorable retirement when there's a chance that he'll forget something in a critical moment?
Lapis Lazuli, most like. Though it's possible it could be jade (which can sometimes be blue). Judging by the description, though, it's lapis.We do have some blue stone, though I'm not actually sure what it is. Has anyone else identified it yet?
Lapis Lazuli. A valuable blue pigment and semiprecious gem.We do have some blue stone, though I'm not actually sure what it is. Has anyone else identified it yet?
Little Misty - Small river, lots of mist(meaning lots of rapids and falls)- Should be the one running horizontally across the map.Also, "Little Misty" and "Snake River". Nice names, but which is which on the map?
Basically it depends on your chosen point of failure.This plan is basically playing it as safe as possible. If the STs have the axe, these are the actions that can help stabilize the nomads better. However, if the DPs have the axe, this at least increases that chance that the nomads decide to fight them instead of negotiating
I haven't empathized with a viewpoint more in quite a long while.You know. I want all the shiny shit. Nobody else gets anything. Fuck everyone and everything.
The issue is remember, we have a workaholic culture. Early retirement is shameful and dishonorable, while an ideal death is to work until the moment you drop dead. Preferably from overwork.Wow, I really do not read closely enough. I assumed that since killing him was the listed option retirement isn't one. If we can retire him without issue why don't we do that rather than kill him? Who cares about honorable retirement when there's a chance that he'll forget something in a critical moment?
I feel like the shamans will either come up with better writing to make up for his retirement or just assign someone as a personal assistant to cover for his lapses.
If the Dead Priests have the axe, if we succeed in taking it. It is a good option only if certain circumstances occur.
However if we unify the Thunder Horse under a favorable heir with the cart then they will continue to attack the Dead Priests even if the Dead Priests have the axe (remember they do not like the Dead Priests). It is a good option no matter who has the axe (Nomad non-heir, Spirit Talkers, Dead Priests, axe lost/buried in battlefield), I think it is more likely to succeed.
Lapis lazuli?there was a remarkable band of blue stone that might be useful for making art or complementary pigments for their red-violet shell dye.