Still think we need a cynical reason to convince Homura we aren't subverted.
Homura knows we aren't cynical. Providing a cynical reason won't help convince her about our real reason.

That's not even a good cynical reason anyway. Stopping something you've been doing because you don't want Kyuubey telling people about it is the definition of shutting the stable door after the horse has bolted.
 
Define agency in a context of multiple people such that I can't poke holes in it. I dare you.

And what else? Free will, maybe? Not sure I see any value in going down that rabbit hole.

I can tell you why I think this way of talking to Homura denies some of her agency, or is at minimum patronizing. If I were to summarize your previous post, it would be something akin to "She doesn't have all the information and we can't give it to her right now, but if she did have it, she'd have made the same decision we're trying to influence her to make. And so it's all ok.".

That's how you interact with children, or people who can't be trusted to make sound decisions on their own. Which Homura absolutely is and why we've yet to potentialbomb her.
 
I think Homura needs something more than a single line of how optimistic Sabrina is. I think she needs to understand where we're coming from here. And I think we need to make it so Sayaka understands what she's asking Homura to get into, rather than just tell her not to ask.

[X] Answer Homura: Because I believe that I was given the knowledge I woke up with so I could fix things, so I could help people. That whoever or whatever was behind it wanted me to have empathy for everyone I knew about, even Oriko. But that doesn't change what she's done in the past, and if I thought she would try to do anything like that again, then I would help you stop her. Whatever it would take. The three of you, Hitomi, Madoka, you're my friends, and I won't let anyone do anything to my friends if it's in my power to stop it. And I was given a lot of power. Also, I think that we might be able to use this to make their imprisonment more secure.
-[X] Subtext: I think Madoka wished me into being, and Madoka wouldn't want us to be cruel to Oriko. But that doesn't mean I'll help Oriko be able to hurt Madoka -- please don't think my kindness means I would side with her against you.

[X] Cut in with Sayaka: It ties into some different, deeply personal things for Homura. I'm not saying not to ask her, or that she should or shouldn't answer, because that's not my place. I'm just saying it's connected to a lot of other, really heavy things for Homura, so that you know just how big of a question you're asking her. So that if she doesn't want to answer, you'll know why. Then pull back a moment so Homura can decide whether she wants to get into that, knowing that Sayaka shouldn't be offended if she declines to answer. (If she does, break vote here, because that'd be huge!)
-[X] Subtext: I have just been talking about really deep personal history knowledge for Oriko of all people, so my being protective of Homura on this subject ought to be quickly tied to that, to help reinforce that Sayaka's question is bigger than she thinks it is.

[X] Elaborate more on Oriko's precognition and vision, motives for specific actions, bring up her tip that helped save Sayaka from the witch, and the different sorts of blind-spots Feathers and I produce in her precog. And that I have reason to trust what she was saying when first captured because (shamefully) I had threatened Kirika with a fate worse than death if she didn't answer truthfully.
-[X] Subtext: I will do things I will hate myself for afterwards to protect my friends.

[X] Vote in abeyance
-[X] Specifically note that I welcome suggestions for security measures.
Adhoc vote count started by Firnagzen on Apr 4, 2018 at 9:01 PM, finished with 135507 posts and 23 votes.

  • [X] Answer Homura: Because I believe that I was given the knowledge I woke up with so I could fix things, so I could help people. That whoever or whatever was behind it wanted me to have empathy for everyone I knew about, even Oriko. But that doesn't change what she's done in the past, and if I thought she would try to do anything like that again, then I would help you stop her. Whatever it would take. The three of you, Hitomi, Madoka, you're my friends, and I won't let anyone do anything to my friends if it's in my power to stop it. And I was given a lot of power. Also, I think that we might be able to use this to make their imprisonment more secure.
    -[X] Subtext: I think Madoka wished me into being, and Madoka wouldn't want us to be cruel to Oriko. But that doesn't mean I'll help Oriko be able to hurt Madoka -- please don't think my kindness means I would side with her against you.
    [X] Cut in with Sayaka: It ties into some different, deeply personal things for Homura. I'm not saying not to ask her, or that she should or shouldn't answer, because that's not my place. I'm just saying it's connected to a lot of other, really heavy things for Homura, so that you know just how big of a question you're asking her. So that if she doesn't want to answer, you'll know why. Then pull back a moment so Homura can decide whether she wants to get into that, knowing that Sayaka shouldn't be offended if she declines to answer. (If she does, break vote here, because that'd be huge!)
    -[X] Subtext: I have just been talking about really deep personal history knowledge for Oriko of all people, so my being protective of Homura on this subject ought to be quickly tied to that, to help reinforce that Sayaka's question is bigger than she thinks it is.
    [X] Elaborate more on Oriko's precognition and vision, motives for specific actions, bring up her tip that helped save Sayaka from the witch, and the different sorts of blind-spots Feathers and I produce in her precog. And that I have reason to trust what she was saying when first captured because (shamefully) I had threatened Kirika with a fate worse than death if she didn't answer truthfully.
    -[X] Subtext: I will do things I will hate myself for afterwards to protect my friends.
    [X] Vote in abeyance
    -[X] Specifically note that I welcome suggestions for security measures.
    [X] Homura:
    -[X] Goal: Re-assure we're on her side.
    --[X] We're just someone who helps people.
    --[X] We will stop Oriko if she tries anything.
    --[X] Our metaknowledge and observations make us believe this is the best way forward.
    -[X] Potentially:
    --[X] Point lives saved and alliances made because we're like this.
    --[X] Oriko foreseeing her own death, at Homura's, Sayaka's, or our hands.
    --[X] Consequences of treating prisoners (and teenagers) inhumanely.
    [X] Sayaka:
    -[X] Let Homura field the question.
    --[X] If necessary, intervene in favour of Homura keeping her secrets.
    [X] Vote in abeyance
    [x] Answer Homura
    -[x] On a personal level? Same as with everyone else; I want to help. I believe that everything can be fixed. Meguca are for saving.
    --[x] I sound naive. I know. But I believe I have this information about people for a reason. To help everyone I can.
    ---[x] I know there are people, like the insane serial killer magical girl who hoards souls gems, who are beyond anything but the most extreme forms of "help". If I thought Oriko was like that, we wouldn't be having this discussion. But she's not. She's just as much a victim as pretty much every magical girl.
    --[x] Oriko did a lot of bad things. She could have done more. We stopped her. If I even suspected she was plotting anything, then I wouldn't hesitate to stop her again. I would never let her hurt you three, Hitomi, Madoka- you're all my friends, and I won't let anyone do anything to my friends if it's in my power to stop it. And I was given a lot of power.
    ---[x] That said, with the information I have, I believe this is the best course of action to make sure it never comes to that.
    -[x] More practically? Imprisoning meguca is difficult and expensive. We have limited resources and people. Meguca justice must be preventative, not punitive. We applied that principle in Sendai; whether we like it or not, it's proven itself so far.
    --[x] Oriko and Kirika are extremely useful assets. They've already helped save a lot of people.
    ---[x] Elaborate if necessary (e.g. Masami and Hiroko, Fukushima, saving Sayaka from the witch, Sendai, Asunaro, etc)
    [X] Sayaka:
    -[x] Let Homura field that question
    --[x] If Homura ignores it, do likewise.
    ---[x] If, and only if, Sayaka keeps pressing the issue with Homura, or asks us explicitly:
    ----[x] Tell her it ties into some deeply personal things, as well as some very sensitive information. Homura has good reasons to decide not to answer, and I support her decision.
    ---[x] Either way, drop the subject.
    --[x] If Homura decides to answer, support her.
    [X] Vote in abeyance
    -[X] Specifically note that I welcome suggestions for security measures.
    [X]Null
    [X] meguca are for befriending
    [X] to Sayaka - If it isn't a matter of retribution, could that question be dropped? Homura is on the spot if you insist. Give her a few months?
    [X] Homura. Saving people who will accept being saved can't be wrong. And, when they help our friends, it matters more to us.
    [X] Oriko is changing. Not a threat now. We think we have her on your side, contributing to Mitakihara.
    -[X] As an ally, Oriko has already helped us build a bigger and safer community. She has skills to trade.
    -[X] Ask about her own evaluation and inspection of Oriko.
    [X] We keep taking them out to interact, and watch the results
    [X] What is the better alternative?
    [X] Offer hugs. Accept fear. Share hope.
    [X] Plan joint agreement of next stage Oriko imprisonment, rules. Future hearing, and sentencing.
    [X] return timestop
    [X] Group enchant? That soft rock is ready for other magic now...?
    [X] More on the GENERAL topic of adult help now? Anri is still out there, we still need development assistance, refugees are in mourning, ask alternatives. Ask preferences for how they want to see this happen.
 
Last edited:
Actually, I can think of one more thing we could do. Homura sees people as the same across multiple timelines, but there's nothing saying that people can't have qualities she hasn't discovered before. I'm tempted to add a glance at Mami into this. Homura was completely surprised when we got Mami to tell Sayaka and Madoka to not become magical girls and I'm tempted to draw parallels between them, because their negative actions are both drawn out by their being victimized -- in Mami's case it's her loneliness, in Oriko's case it's her everything.

It's a bit vague I suppose... But I don't think it could hurt to point out, subtly, that we've already "subverted" one "problem" (mumi is not a problem D: )

Something like this:

-[] If she was some insane villain you woudn't be doing this. But she's not. She's just as much a victim as pretty much every magical girl you've met. She has the potential to do good and help others, but it's hard to do that when you're a victim, too (glance at Mami)

Might be an unnecessary overcomplication, though...
 
Actually, I can think of one more thing we could do. Homura sees people as the same across multiple timelines, but there's nothing saying that people can't have qualities she hasn't discovered before. I'm tempted to add a glance at Mami into this. Homura was completely surprised when we got Mami to tell Sayaka and Madoka to not become magical girls and I'm tempted to draw parallels between them, because their negative actions are both drawn out by their being victimized -- in Mami's case it's her loneliness, in Oriko's case it's her everything.

I think this is important and we should bring it up sometime soon.

Having said that:

[X] Godwinson
 
-[X] (You'll do things you will hate yourself for afterwards to protect your friends.)

Er. How about not?

It was done not to "protect our friends", but to beat the information out of Oriko, plain and simple. We don't really have to sacrifice our moral integrity to save everyone. I mean, we absolutely can.

I'm sorry if I sound like I'm nitpicking, but this isn't really what I'd like to see in our vote for action. I don't believe that Sabrina is a person who needs to go around torturing and threatening people out of hand in order to achieve her goals, so convincing ourselves of it, even to make Homura sympathize with us, for example, doesn't sound like a good idea to me.

Your thoughts?
 
Er. How about not?

It was done not to "protect our friends", but to beat the information out of Oriko, plain and simple. We don't really have to sacrifice our moral integrity to save everyone. I mean, we absolutely can.

I'm sorry if I sound like I'm nitpicking, but this isn't really what I'd like to see in our vote for action. I don't believe that Sabrina is a person who needs to go around torturing and threatening people out of hand in order to achieve her goals, so convincing ourselves of it, even to make Homura sympathize with us, for example, doesn't sound like a good idea to me.

Your thoughts?
Sabrina's motive for getting the information is what I was looking at. It's parenthetical because it's not something that Sabrina is supposed to say, but something that is supposed to be there as subtext. But I'll make that more clear.
 
Actually, I can think of one more thing we could do. Homura sees people as the same across multiple timelines, but there's nothing saying that people can't have qualities she hasn't discovered before. I'm tempted to add a glance at Mami into this. Homura was completely surprised when we got Mami to tell Sayaka and Madoka to not become magical girls and I'm tempted to draw parallels between them, because their negative actions are both drawn out by their being victimized -- in Mami's case it's her loneliness, in Oriko's case it's her everything.

It's a bit vague I suppose... But I don't think it could hurt to point out, subtly, that we've already "subverted" one "problem" (mumi is not a problem D: )

Something like this:

-[] If she was some insane villain you woudn't be doing this. But she's not. She's just as much a victim as pretty much every magical girl you've met. She has the potential to do good and help others, but it's hard to do that when you're a victim, too (glance at Mami)

Might be an unnecessary overcomplication, though...
Also, since I missed responding to this somehow, this is something that we should say to Homura in some manner... but in private timestop. So not right now, sadly.
 
**returns from sleep breakfast the dead making tea** Holy shit we're not dead/nobody has stormed off in anger! Road to success, right there. Despite my faith in the outgoing vote(s), I admit I was concerned. Tense discussions are tense, yeah?

Homura makes a low noise in the back of her throat, and unwinds one arm far enough to make a tiny beckoning gesture at Mami.

... I think our Homura needs Madoka-hugs. For her health and wellbeing.

You know, it occurs to me, it may have been a good thing to ask for timestop, for more reasons than just informational security and the length of the conversation. Reading over:

Colour drains from the world, the noise of the city sliced away instantly. Mami exhales slowly, arm tightening around you, and Sayaka shifts uncomfortably, staring around at the frozen world. It's only her... second experience of Homura's timestop, you think.

I was reminded how unsettling people often find the stillness and silence of timestop. But rereading the chapter, I was also reminded that timestop is Homura's sanctuary- that while others may find it unsettling, for Homura, it's something of a comfort. In timestop, nothing changes where she can't see it. People are exactly where she's left them. No accidents, no tragedies, can befall Madoka; nor can anybody upset the fragile pieces of any of Homura's plans; nor can any Incubator close a contract. There are no variables that move on their own, in timestop; the only things that move do so at Homura's grace.

As much as we may impose a bit on that peace, having this discussion in timestop, we're only here on Homura's sufferance. She's holding the ribbon keeping us here, it's not tied to her; she can drop it at any moment and we probably wouldn't have time to stop her (and wouldn't even if we did, but, well, it's always the just in case that one must answer to). The totality of the stillness and all the agency in the world between instants would return entirely to Homura again. In that same vein, in that same just in case, even if she's dismissed the idea for awhile now as unnecessary, I suspect it is something of a comfort that we would be at her mercy, the moment she chose. More importantly, if she concluded it was necessary to deal with Oriko and Kirika, from timestop it is within her power to do so in an instant.

In the same way that I have a bit of a suspicion the fact Homura can check on their house arrest at her leisure is at least a part of why O&K haven't had a mysterious accident by now, I think part of the reason Homura hasn't just dropped this conversation is because she can, she has the definitive power to do so. We're not keeping her here; she's allowing us. Having this discussion in a place of comfort for her, where, more or less, Homura has all the power in the world, reverses a lot of the social pressure that comes from having a group conversation about a heavy topic like this in the first place.

And also. Having this talk in timestop means that, while we're discussing Oriko aka A Major Danger To Madoka (tm), Madoka herself is not potentially in danger during this conversation. I suspect that before Homura leaves timestop or right after this conversation she's going to want to go make absolutely sure of that, because that sort of concern still creeps up on you even if you're absolutely sure it shouldn't need to, but while we're here, Homura is probably able to be at least a tiny bit less tense about needing to check on Madoka every time we mention Oriko's name. And every tiny bit less tension is a tiny bit more leeway for us to not utterly implode this conversation.

So, yeah, those are just my thoughts about that.

Homura goes still, gaze locking onto you. Her hand whitens around the ribbon, fingers of her other hand curling loosely.

... I am wondering, if this moment indicates she did indeed catch the idea that it was Madoka's wish that we're pretty sure led us here, to this particular information and argument. I think it's not unlikely, even if we don't touch on the idea again, though we might well end up doing so just as a byproduct of our overall explanation.

Re: emotional appeal versus logical appeal: I think something to keep in mind, is that someone can cleave to the things that matter to them with all the strength and force of emotion, and hold to it because it is theirs, but equally, they might need to be convinced both emotionally and logically of anything that seems to go against that driving center ideal. Because convincing them emotionally (in this case meaning not trying to outweigh a world's worth of emotional value) means giving them reason to believe, emotionally, that what you are proposing isn't incompatible with their central emotional ideal/motivation. And to do that (particularly in the case of someone with a lot of reasons to be paranoid and extremely cautious), you often need to logically address every single nagging thought and concern that their brain could stir up and cause them worry. Give them strong enough logical reasons that outweigh the brewing gut instinct, the anxiety, that says this is going against the thing that is most important to me.

Or, that is what I gather, in my experience. Obviously, subject to interpretation whether this applies to Homura in this situation.

Actually, I can think of one more thing we could do. Homura sees people as the same across multiple timelines, but there's nothing saying that people can't have qualities she hasn't discovered before. I'm tempted to add a glance at Mami into this. Homura was completely surprised when we got Mami to tell Sayaka and Madoka to not become magical girls and I'm tempted to draw parallels between them, because their negative actions are both drawn out by their being victimized -- in Mami's case it's her loneliness, in Oriko's case it's her everything.

Also, since I missed responding to this somehow, this is something that we should say to Homura in some manner... but in private timestop. So not right now, sadly.

Private timestop later probably seems like the best place to address loop-intel-specific arguments like this, yeah.

Also, for the moment:

[x] Godwinson

I feel like there are still things that might should be tweaked, but I'm not sure I could pin them down at the moment, and I think this is a good direction to be headed.

minor edits for spacing and clarity
 
Last edited:
Edited vote to emphasize that we'll welcome suggestions for improved security.

Further edited the vote to be from an entirely first-person perspective in writing. Neatness in vote composition, in-joke run wild, you decide! :V
 
Last edited:
I think it's great we're finally not treating word limit as the rule it wasn't, but this is getting a tad stream-of-consciousness/wall-o-text-y. It's making it more difficult, at least for me, to keep track of what's the point being pursued each line, and that should get worse with every new iteration of a new wall-of-text vote.


[X] Homura:
-[X] Because you were given the knowledge and power to fix things, and help people.
--[X] If you didn't, Oriko would be dead, as so would the people she helped save, some which are your friends.
-[X] Explain your belief that you can help Oriko through this, supported by metaknowledge and the progress you've seen (e.g. Wish rejection).

[X] Sayaka:
-[X] If Homura doesn't answer, tell Sayaka it's deeply personal, and Homura that has good reasons to not answer.

[X] Vote in abeyance.
 
Last edited:
Hmm. I like where you're getting at.

[X] Onmur

( no, I'm not voting for Onmur because I'm a member of a highly secretive Shitposter Club. There is no such thing. Move along, Citizen. )
 
[X] Elaborate more on Oriko's precognition and vision, motives for specific actions, bring up her tip that helped save Sayaka from the witch, and the different sorts of blind-spots Feathers and I produce in her precog. And that I have reason to trust what she was saying when first captured because (shamefully) I had threatened Kirika with a fate worse than death if she didn't answer truthfully.

Is there a reason to talk about the mechanics of Oriko's precog here? I don't think it helps to convince Homura, and I think we've given Sayaka enough to absorb as well. Talking about her good behaviour, on the other hand, I do approve of, especially given that Homura hasn't seen any of it first-hand.
 
Is there a reason to talk about the mechanics of Oriko's precog here? I don't think it helps to convince Homura, and I think we've given Sayaka enough to absorb as well. Talking about her good behaviour, on the other hand, I do approve of, especially given that Homura hasn't seen any of it first-hand.
Because it establishes that even if she does go rogue, her power's gaps specifically makes it hard for her to plot against us.
 
Because it establishes that even if she does go rogue, her power's gaps specifically makes it hard for her to plot against us.

I'm concerned that since our understanding of the limits of Oriko's powers weren't part of our metaknowledge, and instead were something Oriko personally told us about, Homura won't be inclined to trust it.

(And she knows that it wasn't part of our metaknowledge, since we didn't volunteer it during the timestop hunt for Oriko.)
 
Two thoughts, one nitpicky and the other not, @Godwinson :

Nitpicky thing: Is there any way to format the spacing of the vote so it's more readable? Like a linebreak after every "-[x]"? That's still valid formatting, right? Because while I like your vote, it's a bit hard to go through and track, visibly speaking, the way it's arranged.

More substantial thing: Regarding:

[X] Cut in with Sayaka: It ties into some different, deeply personal things for Homura. I'm not saying not to ask her, or that she should or shouldn't answer, because that's not my place. I'm just saying it's connected to a lot of other, really heavy things for Homura, so that you know just how big of a question you're asking her. So that if she doesn't want to answer, you'll know why.

Can we maybe shorten this, or- I was going to say leave a note to wait and see if Homura does want to field this question and speak for herself, or if she's going to pointedly ignore it, but I guess the fact she's asked us a question instead of replying says she's pointedly ignoring it- Actually, I guess what's bugging me is that it comes across to me like we're talking like she's not here. Maybe it's just that I don't tend to really refer to people by name a lot, in general because I'm terrible with faces and names and am petrified of using the wrong one because I've done it before, but especially in third person when they're a part of the conversation I'm in, particularly within two consecutive sentences. Oh- I guess, looking at it, it feels to me like emphasizing that all these things are heavy and personal "for Homura" kind of places a lot of burden for the importance of these things as solely some sort of Homura's-Own-Federal-Fucking-Issue-(tm), which I mean they are, but that implication ignores the fact that this information is also just straight up a general security issue with wider significance.

... which was a really long and possibly unnecessarily rambling way of asking, can we maybe rephrase this bit as "Cut in with Sayaka: It ties into some different, deeply personal things for Homura. I'm not saying not to ask her, or that she should or shouldn't answer, because that's not my place. I'm just saying it's connected to a lot of other, really heavy things, so that you know just how big of a question you're asking. So that if she doesn't want to answer, you'll know why." or something?

I'm concerned that since our understanding of the limits of Oriko's powers weren't part of our metaknowledge, and instead were something Oriko personally told us about, Homura won't be inclined to trust it.

(And she knows that it wasn't part of our metaknowledge, since we didn't volunteer it during the timestop hunt for Oriko.)

On the other hand, the feathers independently verified some of that information about the limit of Oriko's powers, didn't they? Don't recall exactly, may be misremembering.

edited for clarity and because composing this post left some incorrect remainders of earlier drafts of sentence arrangement
 
Last edited:
I'm concerned that since our understanding of the limits of Oriko's powers weren't part of our metaknowledge, and instead were something Oriko personally told us about, Homura won't be inclined to trust it.

(And she knows that it wasn't part of our metaknowledge, since we didn't volunteer it during the timestop hunt for Oriko.)
Yeah, the main place of reassuring Homura comes in the "We're wanting to put more security in the place we move them to" section. But I've edited things to bring that up earlier.
 
Last edited:
On the other hand, the feathers independently verified some of that information about the limit of Oriko's powers, didn't they? Don't recall exactly, may be misremembering.

The feather is a feather. Certainly the fact a feather showed up around the time something weird happened to Sayaka, when Oriko earlier claimed feathers obscure her sight is suggestive, but I'm not sure calling anything "verified" is accurate.

For all we know it might literally be a coincidental crow feather. (Probably not, because Chekov's gun, but still.)
 
The feather is a feather. Certainly the fact a feather showed up around the time something weird happened to Sayaka, when Oriko earlier claimed feathers obscure her sight is suggestive, but I'm not sure calling anything "verified" is accurate.

For all we know it might literally be a coincidental crow feather. (Probably not, because Chekov's gun, but still.)

Fair points. Verified is perhaps too strong a word. Though the phrasing of:

A single feather, black and long pinioned, drifts to the ground from where the Barrier was.

does imply we observed it was something spoopy having to do with our Barrier we're still not a Witch, right guys?. And thus, its status as weird and not unlikely to have the interaction Oriko has claimed.

Though, of course, this isn't helped by the fact we can't actually tell anyone that "Mitakihara + Witch Barrier (made by meguca) + meguca (made by Meduka) + black long pinioned feather = PANIC AND RIOTING IN THE STREETS! TAKE COVER! GRAB YOUR MAMI AND NAGISA! DON'T GO OUTSIDE EVER AGAIN! LISTEN TO BROADCASTS BY YOUR RESIDENT PRECOG! THE END OF TIME, OR THE WORLD, PROBABLY IS NIGH!"

edited for added entertainment value
 
Last edited:
Back
Top