- Location
- The Surface Of A Hostile Planet
Yeah, that kind of breakup could snowball out of control in a hurry.
I dunno. Once we break the ice, I bet they'll be really chill.
Yeah, that kind of breakup could snowball out of control in a hurry.
If things go bad, they'd start giving each other the cold shoulder.Yeah, that kind of breakup could snowball out of control in a hurry.
sadly, she will learn that his heart is as cold as ice.If things go bad, they'd start giving each other the cold shoulder.
I think we'll find that their personality is quite sunny, actually.
Yeah, I think they've cooled down.
Oi, no need to dismiss Aranfan so coldly.
Nah, End Times implies things won't go back to how they were once the next update comes along. This is more along the lines of hibernation.So, this is how far we've fallen, huh? Punning to keep ourselves entertained. Truly, the End Times are upon us.
... you did that on purpose, didn't you?Nah, End Times implies things won't go back to how they were once the next update comes along. This is more along the lines of hibernation.
Blast, you found me out. Truly, you would make for an excellent medium, given your talent for cold reading.
Have you never broken the ice with a porpoise?
Now you're just trying too hard. 0 degrees out of 10, for shame.Blast, you found me out. Truly, you would make for an excellent medium, given your talent for cold reading.
Johann | 48.70317003 |
Panoramia | 48.12680115 |
Roswita | 32.85302594 |
Anton | 31.98847262 |
Dragon | 27.08933718 |
Oswald | 26.5129683 |
Cadeath | 20.4610951 |
Kazador's sons | 13.25648415 |
Heidi | 12.68011527 |
Asarnil | 11.81556196 |
Max | 10.08645533 |
Francesco | 10.08645533 |
Belegar | 9.221902017 |
The We | 8.645533141 |
Esbjern & Seija | 7.204610951 |
Gretel | 5.763688761 |
Daroir | 5.187319885 |
Qrech | 4.610951009 |
Ruprecht | 4.034582133 |
Gotri | 3.746397695 |
Kazrik & Edda | 3.458213256 |
Julia | 3.170028818 |
Algard | 3.170028818 |
Adela | 3.170028818 |
So what your saying is i have as much a chance of seeing half-elf babies as Bernie Sanders has of being the next president of the United States?Now, to save our thread from cold-hearted punishment, I've decided to calculate the percentages of every candidate that has more than 10 votesbecause that's around the percentage you'd need to enter the Danish parlament . That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
As we can see while there isn't any option that satisfies a majority, both Johann and Panoramia almost does that. Meanwhile, we see a drop of ~16 percentage points down to the next "tier" with Roswita and Anton, which is not a small amount. From there the differences starts getting smaller, with only ~6 percentage point drops between "Tier 2-3" and "Tier 3-4", with Tier 4 notably only containing Cadeath and having the support of 20% of the voterbase.
Johann 48.70317003 Panoramia 48.12680115 Roswita 32.85302594 Anton 31.98847262 Dragon 27.08933718 Oswald 26.5129683 Cadeath 20.4610951 Kazador's sons 13.25648415 Heidi 12.68011527 Asarnil 11.81556196 Max 10.08645533 Francesco 10.08645533 Belegar 9.221902017 The We 8.645533141 Esbjern & Seija 7.204610951 Gretel 5.763688761 Daroir 5.187319885 Qrech 4.610951009 Ruprecht 4.034582133 Gotri 3.746397695 Kazrik & Edda 3.458213256 Julia 3.170028818 Algard 3.170028818 Adela 3.170028818
From there it is a relatively steep drop of ~7 percentage points down to the rest, and from here on the differences are so small and fluid it no longer makes sense to divide things into separate tiers.
and unlike the last time I pretended to do statistics on shipping in this thread, this time I can claim the numbers are statistically significant.Also, now might be a good time to mention that I slept through all my statistics lessons
We can't tell from these statistics, as we don't know if any of the candidates would reciprocate Mathilde's feelings nor whether they'd want to have children or not.So what your saying is i have as much a chance of seeing half-elf babies as Bernie Sanders has of being the next president of the United States?
I don't really care about the analysis, but you used "percentage points", so you get a like.
because of approval voting, singleton vote are not necessarily relevant for analyse. (e.g, I voted for both Roswita and Anton, but I would just vote for Anton if this was a competing vote.)But, if you'd do another one when you show how much of the voterbase is in favor of just Johann, how much is in favor of just Panoramia, how much for both and how much for neither, I'd slap another like on that.
Calling him Magister John like you found him on a street corner. For shame.So doing the same thing @Omegahugger did, but using actually significant numbers as a breakaway instead of forcing bias, (40 votes, which by coincidence is also the top 10, don't you love it when this stuff works out.) we get...
![]()
because of approval voting, singleton vote are not necessarily relevant for analyse. (e.g, I voted for both Roswita and Anton, but I would just vote for Anton if this was a competing vote.)
So what can we see?
its surprisingly tight when you put it all together (Johnna actually only has a +10% lead overall vote over Asarnil when you look at all the vote) but it actually makes sense when you think about the fact that most of those that voted for Johnna and Pan also voted for others as well, looking at this, I would not be surprised if there are a lot more people who didn't vote for either of these two then there are those that just voted for Johnn or Pan.
While I think that they are still favourites, I would not be surprised, if say, Anton or Roswita will actually be more popular in a competitive, 'winner takes all' vote... though I would not be surprised if the opposite is true too.
basically, it's actually too close to tell with the top picks who would win when Approval changes to competitive, because we cant tell if Johnna and Pan are the 'favourites' or are 'generally acceptable, but lose out if people have one pick.'
oops, but I'll have to redo the whole thing to fix it.... so fuck that.Calling him Magister John like you found him on a street corner. For shame.
Or just him lol.oops, but I'll have to redo the whole thing to fix it.... so fuck that.
The saddest part is that of the four times you mention him even in the normal text, not a single one is spelled correctly.oops, but I'll have to redo the whole thing to fix it.... so fuck that.
So doing the same thing @Omegahugger did, but using actually significant numbers as a breakaway instead of forcing bias, (40 votes, which by coincidence is also the top 10, don't you love it when this stuff works out.) we get...