[X] [MONEY] Council of Manhorak
[X] [SHEETS] Yes
[X] [ARMARIUM] Cult of Morr
[X] [SCROLLS] You
[X] [FLESH] You
[X] [RING] Take
[X] [SHEETS] Yes
[X] [ARMARIUM] Cult of Morr
[X] [SCROLLS] You
[X] [FLESH] You
[X] [RING] Take
The current level of revelation means that readers are equally free to imagine a Mathilde that blushes her way out of the room, and one that takes a moment to compose herself, reopens the cabinet, and starts filling a sack with esoteric plunder. Coming right out and saying that she's taking it all home with her would only be worthwhile if I'm going to follow through on describing how she uses it, and that would be rather a tonal shift from what's already established here. And though I think SV's rules would allow it if tagged and spoilered appropriately (having a smutty interlude between the protagonist and her long-term partner 880k words into a story would certainly seem to count as 'part of a larger body of work') I don't think a lot of SV posters are actually aware that that's within the rules, and I don't fancy the drama of being seen as a major precedent setter.
You realise that unless it's plot relevant, SV is the type of site where if the story isn't set as mature, it would have to be tagged and spoilered and probably placed somewhere other than the main threadmark? It's perfectly possible to skip smut if it's not central to the story.I don't know if it was this thread or another one where I've said it before, but in case it was another one I'll say it here.
I appreciate the fact that you don't actually put smutty stuff in. References and implications to things happening "off screen" like what has been the case so far I don't care about, but were it to come "on screen" I'd probably just stop reading. I don't come to SV to read that sort of thing, and I always appreciate it when authors choose to leave those sorts of details up to the reader.
No, you'd basically need to controlled demolition the entire mountain into rubble to achieve that, and the miners don't have that much explosives. It's possible Zhufbar doesn't have that much explosives.
What if as a future action Mathilde hires Zhufbar, K8P, Vlag, to quarry the whole mountain, top to bottom! No need for demolition of perfectly serviceable roadblocks.
It would also be quite a monument to her victory, and perhaps a few paintings could be Commissioned showing her overseeing dwarves labouring too.
A) we definitely don't have enough gold to "hire" them all. B) their still gearing up for mount silverspear so i doubt they would do anything that big until that's done and sorted... And even then i think they would not do it. Just too much effort for too little reward.What if as a future action Mathilde hires Zhufbar, K8P, Vlag, to quarry the whole mountain, top to bottom! No need for demolition of perfectly serviceable roadblocks.
It would also be quite a monument to her victory, and perhaps a few paintings could be Commissioned showing her overseeing dwarves labouring too.
... Is there a mountain with a grudge on it? And if yes, what that mountain do?Dwarves don't like destroying an entire mountain unless it has a Grudge against it. Mountains are their natural territory, the wasteland left by quarrying one into oblivion is the natural territory of gribblies.
... Is there a mountain with a grudge on it? And if yes, what that mountain do?
Mount Thug in the Mountains of Mourne does this:... Is there a mountain with a grudge on it? And if yes, what that mountain do?
This was mentioned a while ago in a thread conversation, though I couldn't find anyone providing a source (tbf I didn't search very hard):IIRC there's lore somewhere of a mountain getting a Grudge against it because there was a landslide that killed a princess or something and the Dwarves had no other way of processing that tragedy, so they quarried it to death.
You can follow the quote chain to see some other posters talking about it.As I recall the story, there was a rockslide during a battle with orcs that turned a sure thing into a near thing. The dwarfs, sensibly, decided the mountain needed to pay for its transgressions and turned a peak into a gravel pit.
Although I suppose it could be true. That it's an example that if Dwarfs suffer tragedy or are hurt badly, then those emotions need to be addressed or worked out someway. And so in one situation, the elders decided to take out all the aggression and sorrow on the mountain, as it made for a harmless outlet that wouldn't hurt anybody.
It does sound like a useful cultural pressure valve. No need for anyone to blame themselves or each other after the battle almost went so badly, it's the mountain's fault for intruding on their battle. And there might be genuine strategic benefits to it if the battle took place close to their Hold and there was a reasonable chance of having to fight there again in the future, removing unsure ground and replacing it with nice clear firing lines.
It's probably a better interpretation than what the initial intent behind the story likely was, which was to make us look at the Dwarves and go "how silly of them". That was the rationale behind a great deal of a lot of the older lore.This was mentioned a while ago in a thread conversation, though I couldn't find anyone providing a source (tbf I didn't search very hard):
You can follow the quote chain to see some other posters talking about it.
The idea that the grudge was a way to process the tragedy is, I believe, original to the thread:
I regret to inform you that we live in a society. A Sigmarite Society to be specific (they encourage abstinence and dislike premarital sex). Parading around Isabella's closet is likely to reduce their legitimacy rather than enhance it.Where is [] [DODGY SEX TOYS]? They would do nicely for the Manharok cult - if you want an in with the establishment then dodgy sex toy that they can pretend are just prestigious historical curios are just the thing.
It's also worth noting, the text of the grudge is something like "until the rocks of the pass are dust".This was mentioned a while ago in a thread conversation, though I couldn't find anyone providing a source (tbf I didn't search very hard):
You can follow the quote chain to see some other posters talking about it.
The idea that the grudge was a way to process the tragedy is, I believe, original to the thread:
We're going to come back in 10 years time looking for some very specific and very embarrassing ritual components, mark my words.Where is [] [DODGY SEX TOYS]? They would do nicely for the Manharok cult - if you want an in with the establishment then dodgy sex toy that they can pretend are just prestigious historical curios are just the thing.
"Historical curios I say! Evidence that those antiquated pagan rotters were morally inferior to modern, clean minded, orthodox society. Nobody here would dream of making working copies for their own use - how dare you!"I regret to inform you that we live in a society. A Sigmarite Society to be specific (they encourage abstinence and dislike premarital sex). Parading around Isabella's closet is likely to reduce their legitimacy rather than enhance it.
I was thinking we could do with a Banner.I wonder if the bedsheets are valuable as enchanting materials.