- Pronouns
- He/Him
Well, suppose I could be tempted by a good explosion.
There is a Explosives vote that isn't counted properly in the bottom as well.Looks like fire is ahead by 1 (thge stray vote that did not get counted properly somehow)
Fair caution, the armor spell lasts minutes, not hours. We do need to recast it in battle, though not frequently, as battles are really fast.Aethyric Armor: Enchanting our robes is a means of having it always on, as soon as we manage to squeeze to Magic 8, we simply update our robes to 3+. Otherwise, it's a pre-battle buff.
Probably the hardest part is convincing a dwarf to loan an ancestral weapon to humans then.Fire is a common dwarven rune, and there's 1,000 runed weapons in Angrund alone, 1/10th of which are currently missing an owner. I think they could do us a solid on a loan if it's used to light hundreds of orcs on fire.
If you aren't covered in sneaky shadow magic, probably.
Given that we usually don't see difficulties on those, Mathilde has no way to know and Ranald likes it that way.@BoneyM, a little while ago someone said that using Ranald's coin to perform a devotional act towards him would reduce the devotion offered to him. Is that correct or is Ranald not the type to care?
... But I don't? Unless we are very succesful, I'm saying our first channeling implement should be a sword, because a plain greatsword is plenty serviceable.
And like I said, I agree with you. An athame or something of the sort would be damn handy.
And the point is, in those situations, such as casting battle magic, or dispel-offs, we have the little room we need to swap implements.
To address everyone at once, because people are getting lost in the argument:
1) It's apparently much easier to enchant a "staff", i.e. a +1 magic thingy, when you have an object roughly the size of a staff.
2) So, I propose we enchant a greatsword. It's virtually all benefit: it serves as a decent melee weapon in a pinch, we are highly familiar with it, and even if we get a super-stabby runic sword, we can just carry two, Witcher style, and the similarity should make quick-drawing pretty easy with a bit of practice. Boney already said that carrying two swords isn't an issue.
3) I nonetheless agree that something wand-sized would be tremendously handy. But that's harder to do, and doesn't seem terribly necessary when the vast majority of our magic which benefits the most from it isn't the sort of thing we'd do in the middle of a furious sword fight, i.e., we'd have the seconds to swap implements even if we were using a less handy one. And we can always cast without it, a +1 increase is notable, but at this point, it's a far less drastic gain than it'd be back in Stirland, when we were rocking magic 4-5.
To sum it up, the un-handyness of a staff-sized tool isn't a real problem, and we might as well make it a sword, because we lose nothing from doing it.
Seems that it just means that for lay Ranald worshippers you give him his cute by ensuring 10% goes to him by any of:The thing is, he and Shallya basically are the charities. Unless you like spending your gold on solid gold churches, in which case Sigmarite churches might count too.
On giving Ranald a cut; he says that every tenth coin is his. However, he doesn't actually have any way to collect that stuff, except having his priests go around and grab it; with no big churches or organizations, all worship of him is highly localized. In the Mathilde Weber convocation, consisting of she, herself and her, she basically is the priest, so giving it to another priest would be redundant. Instead, she just needs to use it in a way he'd vaguely approve of (feeding or taking care of the congregation of Mathilde and herself and herself likely counts, as does helping her help others or just being generally amusing to him).
A nifty Inquisitor's pimp cane would work in that case : D. Like this fellow's:Eyeballing it, we're looking at something ideally about as long as your leg to the gripping end. Made of magic conductive and durable material. A 5-6 foot long staff/spear gripped on the middle or a 3-4 foot long sword/wand/knife(erring on the short side because smolwizard).
In the context of Ranald's completely decentralised cult, I reject this characterisation completely. For say, Sigmar (that ass)- absolutely.
For Ranald- who's to say that the trials and comedies Mathilde has undergone aren't exactly what is required of any faithful aspirant to the priesthood?
Who anointed Heideck and Wolf? Or did they just decide "We're getting old, Wolf." "Yep, that's enough banditry, lets retire to Wurtbad, play cards, and minister to a flock of loosly organised thieves."
She is a priest of Ranald, not a Christian one.
You are right that, by those standards, she will never measure up. So wouldn't Wolf.
Good thing then, that those aren't the standards she is being measured by.
While there's something to what you're saying here the meaning of "tend to the needs of their flock" can get really variable in Warhammer. Consider that all the Knights of Morr- all of them- are considered priests. They can't even talk due to their vow of silence, and the "needs of their flock" that they tend to consist largely of smiting the undead and keeping graveyards from being defiled. Likewise the Grandmaster of the knightly order of Ulricans here is considered a priest of Ulric but he's a knight commander and spends his time and energy on battle, not on attending to Ulrican religious ceremonies- he just does that on the side.
This kind of "priest but spends their life on their job, not on their religion" situation is commonplace and Mathilde fits into it really well. The clergy of Ranald is informal and highly variable. While you're right about the recognition of one's peers (or god directly, in the absence of peers, but Ranald hasn't expressed his opinion on this) is needed for someone to legitimately be a priest, that is as a practical matter the only thing that Mathilde needs before qualifying as one of Ranald's. I don't think it's particularly likely that she'll pursue the course, but it would take 1-2 action slots of talking to his cult members that she knows to learn a few formalities and get rubber-stamped, and she'd get the title.
Or a rapier/swordcane.A nifty Inquisitor's pimp cane would work in that case : D. Like this fellow's:
To add to your list.Money spending options
- Give it back to mercenaries directly
- Mutual aid/survivor benefits fund for mercenaries
- Donate to a charity
- Establish a mercenary company
- Establish a mercenary union
- Commission a top-notch lab in K8P
- Establish a tavern in K8P
- Establish a temple of Ranald and/or Shallya in K8P
- Invest in halfling economy
- Buy out EIC debt
- Improve our fief
- Prospect the Haunted Hills & buy some land there
- Donate to the College
- Buy the best dwarven rifle we can
- Grey College scholarship fund
I added your suggestions. I am almost sure someone posted something along the lines of "just give it all to a bursar to avoid accounting problems" but I can't be bothered to search for it.13. I don't actually think anyone mentioned donating to the college (they already take enough with college dues).
I'm not sure if that was enchantment or animation. Either way, it's not proof it takes little power, as we don't know how much child Mathilde had. Also, we are definitely allowed to have money, because otherwise why would the College tithe us? There'd be no way of them asking anyone for money, because no one would be allowed to have any, side note, as a Magister, we only owe 1/20 of our cash to the College unless that's been changed. Yay.There can simply be academic types, too.
Enchanting doesn't necessarily need much power, Mathilde's literal first act of magic was enchanting.
We are technically not allowed to have money. The Grey College's coin is favours, that's been established for a while.
Dropping a bunch of enchanted staves at the college is, plain and obviously, getting some credit with it.
I'm not sure it might be feasible without a lot more effort, tho, because Boney doesn't like "farming" favors on the background like that.
Mathilde is a Magister, she is essentially a Senior Wizard. "They might force her to sit in a room turning staves because she made some once" is absurd.
How could you forget the best way to use our money? Going full dwarf and piling up all our treasure to sit on.
Yup! Its WHFRP 2edition Ranald strictures, some guy already posted it as well as 4th edition, basically Ranald looks down on those that dont use daggers and armor, you are only supposed to use your wits. I can try to find the images but i'm kinda busy. So just search for key words like Ranald strictures or something. Another guy recently posted it again before the update so that might be easier to find.Is that a thing?
Ranald seem the type of guy to use anything to get the job done.
They don't use swords very much no, there was some discussion on it a few pages ago actually, just search institutional knowledge or Gazul. If we were after a great axe we'd have oodles of options most likely.
Nope. Mathilde is a sword gal.Actually!
We want a great weapon in part to ape a staff, and thus be able to ground via it.
Greataxe is also a good staff!!! In fact, almost a better staff than greatsword, what with having more wood!
So, folks, how about getting Greataxe + greataxe lessons from dorfs?
Actually!
We want a great weapon in part to ape a staff, and thus be able to ground via it.
Greataxe is also a good staff!!! In fact, almost a better staff than greatsword, what with having more wood!
So, folks, how about getting Greataxe + greataxe lessons from dorfs?
Open write-ins always means much fewer votes.Current tally. I'm postong it sone we are past 24 hours and BoneyM would probably close the vote soon-ish. Very close, explosives is leading by just two votes.
The number of voters is relatively few, however. Did the mods scare everyone off?
Fair point, I suppose. It's just that, well....I think that learning a new weapon when we already have skill with the greatsword may be a bit of an action sink, especially since as a two hand weapon style it does not seem to bring too much to the table.
Votes are always higher for simpler and more polarizing topics. For this one, where most plans are fine you'll see a smaller number of voters.The number of voters is relatively few, however. Did the mods scare everyone off?
Votes are always higher for simpler and more polarizing topics. For this one, where most plans are fine you'll see a smaller number of voters.
But this vote doesn't look to be a case of one? Sure, the first round of the vote was, but the second round is very much a choice between simple options.