Voted best in category in the Users' Choice awards.
Voting is open
While we perhaps relate most to the Protector, we are a devotee of all His aspects, including the Gambler.

And after all that, Belegar put it that we "scout like a Ranger" on hearing the (only-somewhat-redacted) report.
Interestingly, Mathilde seems to pray to the Gambler most (probably because luck is always useful), hold the Protector's ideals closest, and utilise the Deciever and Night Prowler's skills most often.
 
Interestingly, Mathilde seems to pray to the Gambler most (probably because luck is always useful), hold the Protector's ideals closest, and utilise the Deciever and Night Prowler's skills most often.
She's a fascinating Ranaldian.

She won't hesitate to manipulate, lie to, omit the truth to, or deceive even her honorable allies and even trusted superiors, and yet she is faithful to them all and has their back to the hilt.

She is an assassin, saboteur, and thief to her enemies and for when overwhelming necessity strikes, but the overwhelming majority of her time is in infrastructure, intelligence, and research. In building and inventing.

She studies dark magic and even necromancy to better defeat both, and is frustrated that she cannot teach others most of her insights without also teaching them the very arts she combats.

She often fights head-on, in the open, with a large and overt weapon and a loud and flash-creating gun.

She is a wizard of the Empire yet wields mostly dwarven gear.

She is a rich shareholder of a major company yet also adheres to the Vow of Poverty more than just as a matter of lip-service, in a way that suggests she values the mentality of the Vow of Poverty in itself.

The company she co-founded is a vast, fast-growing capitalist giant...for the purpose of being a loyal, above-board, reliable economic force in the Empire rather than a corrupt, greedy, dysfunctional tumor hampering the Empire. She has gone to great lengths to ensure that it is scrupulously honest and faithful in its dealings with dwarves.

Despite her grudge against Sigmar and distaste for his cult, she follows many of the ideals Sigmar stands for and championed in life: unity, proactively changing the world for the better, strength and courage against evil, fervor against the enemies of man, and being a good friend to the dwarves.

She meticulously and boldly gambles for the greater good in high-stakes scenarios, rarely for personal gain, relying often on audacity and clever use of manipulation and trickery against friend and foe alike.

She is a grey wizard who is good friends with a light wizard, a celestial wizard, multiple gold wizards, a witch hunter (two if you count Abelhelm, retroactively), and a number of dwarves. She's a stirlandian peasant-born girl who is friends with halflings. She's a knight with no horse and yet she's the fastest (ground-based) rider in the Empire.

She is an endless source of entertainment and fun for Ranald, while also being a true believer and noble twist on the Ranaldian archetype.
 
Interestingly, Mathilde seems to pray to the Gambler most (probably because luck is always useful), hold the Protector's ideals closest, and utilise the Deciever and Night Prowler's skills most often.
To quote Mathilde describing herself, when Heidi sought her out about Mandred having magic:
"I know. I'm not here to talk to my Grey Wizard friend, I'm here to talk to Mandred's Godmother. You're..." She looks at you, considering. "Deceiver and Protector by nature, right?"

You consider that. "I suppose so. Night Prowler situationally, Gambler when I need to and when I want to get His attention."
 
To quote Mathilde describing herself, when Heidi sought her out about Mandred having magic:
Its not necessarily true. Mathilde very rarely corrects perception of other people on how she actually is. Heidi led in with something and Mathilde acquiesced and clarrified, but that does not neccessarily mean the part she agreed to is true in absolute.
 
She is a rich shareholder of a major company yet also adheres to the Vow of Poverty more than just as a matter of lip-service, in a way that suggests she values the mentality of the Vow of Poverty in itself.
She does? She doesn't really go for extravagant luxuries of pleasure or pride that look bad the way the vow should prevent, but she certainly has a pleasant life with nice inns, very nice home. A giant library. Plans for silk sheets.

She understands and agrees why the vow is a thing. But I don't think there's a ideologically commitment to it. She would totally sleep on a treasure hoard if it wasn't uncomfortable, and she likes ostentatious displays, just generally more based on skill than raw wealth.
 
Last edited:
She is a rich shareholder of a major company yet also adheres to the Vow of Poverty more than just as a matter of lip-service, in a way that suggests she values the mentality of the Vow of Poverty in itself.
This is the only one I don't see. She follows what she herself considers the spirit of the intent of the Vow. Namely "don't trick innocent people out of their money". But otherwise she lives in luxury and uses her wealth for her hobby. She eats well, drinks well, is used to top of the notch bathroom amenities and has her professional environment and transportation kited out with every conceivable comfort and utility. And all that on top of being an international landholder. I don't know how to interpret poverty into any of that.

I did enjoy the rest of your observations though.
 
She is an endless source of entertainment and fun for Ranald, while also being a true believer and noble twist on the Ranaldian archetype.

I'd argue that while she is a twist on the Ranaldian archetype, she is not necessarilly nobler than the archetypical Ranaldian character, or at least not nobler than every kind of archetypical Ranaldian character.

The reason Ranald is tolerated is because he is the "best" criminal god. His archetype is that of Robin Hood. Kaiji, at worst Arsene Lupin, of the noble thief who steals from those that does not deserve it, of the daredevil that is ready to risk it all because he knows he owns nothing, not even his own life, of the revolutionary who wants to make the world a better place even if its bloody (ie not the one making a grab for power), of the scammer that scams the corrupt and other scammers.

Even at his worst archetypical characters one can argue exist are not monstrous, which is not to say they are good guys either, Ranald is not a god of ideal pure good: the master thief who would steal something valuable because it is well guarded, the casino that parts fools from their money but not to the point of destroying their families (its still an abuse tho) reasoning that it sells entrertrainment, the protector of a group that only really cares about his group and would hurt anyone not in it if it would protect it, the man who would play a cruel joke to an undeserving man just because its funny and it proves said man's intellectual superiority.

Does that mean every devotee of Ranald is like that? Hell no, but every god has devotees that do not fit the archetypes they champion. Corrupt judges pray to Verena, Shallyans who want to cauterise disease though extermination pray to Shallya and so do quack doctors, and Dieter IV prayed to Sigmar. Of course he is the god of crime, the cutpurse that steals from whoever and the scammer who seeks the most vulnerable as marks, the mafia don, the gambling addict, the casino that takes everything, they all pray to Ranald. They are just not the kind of people Ranald encourages.

But my point is, even if most worshippers of Ranald are not archetypal and even if there are Ranald archetypes that are not what one could call moral, noble Ranald archetypes are encouraged enough by Ranald for the nobility to not be a twist.
 
Last edited:
Not related to current topic, but looking back at the Karak Eight Peaks Expedition, holy shit did Mathilde take some wild risks to pull off the multiple tactical triumphs she did.

[...]

That "Brave" trait really undersells it.
There's also the fact that, in-character, Mathilde didn't really have that much to loose back then. She joined the reclamation precisely because she was searching for something, to fill the void left in her life after being dismissed by Roswita.
You hesitate before answering. "I seek... well, I seek something to seek."
Both the mission of supporting Abelhelm push into Sylvania, to which she had dedicated herself and the conspiracy that had ensnared her were suddenly gone. So she threw herself at the closest righteous mission she could see trying to find the purpose she had lost.

And really, is it any wonder that she didn't seem to have that much regard for the risks she took while on this new mission?

Compare the Mathilde at the beginning of the Reclamation with present day Mathilde, with her steady romantic relationship, numerous social circles, an official position of power and respect resting at the back off a wildly successful career, an extensive, eclectic and sometimes groundbreaking corpus of academic publications, etc etc.

The Mathilde of the Reclamation was a newly minted Magister with a single paper to her name, the more amazing part of which was the fact that the slog of writing it didn't convince her to never write again. She had a quite the sparse social life, being close to two former coworkers and the teacher that she had seen all of three times in the last years. Her domain as a Knight was a piece of unimportant barely populated land, to which she had been once and with inhabitants that probably wouldn't even notice if she got killed. Her greatest accomplishment was marred by the personal tragedy surrounding it, etc etc.

What I'm trying to say is, Mathilde might not have been actively suicidal, but she didn't have that many things incentivizing her to minimise risks taken either.
 
Last edited:
There's also the fact that, in-character, Mathilde didn't really have that much to loose back then. She joined the reclamation precisely because she was searching for something, to fill the void left in her life after being dismissed by Roswita.

Both the mission of supporting Abelhelm push into Sylvania, to which she had dedicated herself and the conspiracy that had ensnared her were suddenly gone. So she threw herself at the closest righteous mission she could see trying to find the purpose she had lost.

And really, is it any wonder that she didn't seem to have that much regard for the risks she took while on this new mission?

Compare the Mathilde at the beginning of the Reclamation with present day Mathilde, with her steady romantic relationship, numerous social circles, an official position of power and respect resting the back off a wildly successful career, an extensive, eclectic and sometimes groundbreaking corpus of academic publications, etc etc.

The Mathilde of the Reclamation was a newly minted Magister with a single paper to her name, the more amazing part of which was the fact that the slog of writing it didn't convince her to never write again. She had a quite the sparse social life, being close to two former coworkers and the teacher that she had seen all of three times in the last years. Her domain as a Knight was a piece of unimportant barely populated land, to which she had been once and with inhabitants probably wouldn't even notice if she got killed. Her greatest accomplishment was marred by the personal tragedy surrounding it, etc etc.

What I'm trying to say is, Mathilde might not have been actively suicidal, but she didn't have that many things incentivizing her to minimise risks taken either.
While I think you make a very good point, I do want to point out she didn't stop taking risks.

The whole Dum thing, she could've just stayed home. Even during that trip, when it was two people against a whole camp of favored chaos worshipers and she could've left with a success, she still stuck around for the bearican.
When it comes up, she still goes for the biggest baddest thing around and tries to sword it in the face, be it chaos champion, greater daemon, or I guess that one uppity tree.

So if things have been less risky it's only partially because of her reduced willingness to risk, and in good part because she's gotten skilled and equipped and connected enough that a lot of things aren't risky anymore. Fresh Magister Mathilde probably could've assassinated the Tsar, but it would've been fraught. LM Mathilde is more torn out about how easy it is and the philosophy of what a good rule must do than the mechanical difficulty of the act.
 
Last edited:
While I think you make a very good point, I do want to point out she didn't stop taking risks.

The whole Dum thing, she could've just stayed home. Even during that trip, when it was two people against a whole camp of favored chaos worshipers and she could've left with a success, she still stuck around for the bearican.
When it comes up, she still goes for the biggest baddest thing around and tries to sword it in the face, be it chaos champion, greater daemon, or I guess that one uppity tree.

So if things have been less risky it's only partially because of her reduced willingness to risk, and in good part because she's gotten skilled and equipped and connected enough that a lot of things aren't risky anymore. Fresh Magister Mathilde probably could've assassinated the Tsar, but it would've been fraught. LM Mathilde is more torn out about how easy it is and the philosophy of what a good rule must do than the mechanical difficulty of the act.
That may be so, but if we are talking about in-universe!Mathilde rather than Quest Protagonist!Mathilde, I would still argue that the foundation for that high-risk high-reward inclination of hers was laid during the Reclamation. It was there that, time and time again, she went all in, betting with her life and soul, and time and time again she managed to walk away with Boxcars, to the sincere gratitude of her peers and superiors and with immediately visible positive consequences on the world at large for those she cared about.

Combine that with her religious faith, and it's really no wonder she kept to that MO afterwards.
 
That may be so, but if we are talking about in-universe!Mathilde rather than Quest Protagonist!Mathilde, I would still argue that the foundation for that high-risk high-reward inclination of hers was laid during the Reclamation. It was there that, time and time again, she went all in, betting with her life and soul, and time and time again she managed to walk away with Boxcars, to the sincere gratitude of her peers and superiors and with immediately visible positive consequences on the world at large for those she cared about.

Combine that with her religious faith, and it's really no wonder she kept to that MO afterwards.
I'd say it preceeds it. One of the first things she did was wander through a castle for dark secrets, and when she found one and nearly gotten her face chewed off, her reaction wasn't to play it safe in the future. It was to pick up a greatsword and head into a burial mount soon after.

Brave had been part of her since character creation, she always been that way, she just didn't have the chance to live it before.
 
To quote Mathilde describing herself, when Heidi sought her out about Mandred having magic:

Not to disagree, but to add some context to that scene that I think might be interesting but isn't in the text because it would have detracted from the focus on Heidi: Mathilde takes a moment to consider it because to her, being a Ranaldian is one major facet to her character among several - being a Wizard, being a Stirlandian, being a citizen of Eight Peaks, heading the Waystone Project. Most major things she does is in service of one of those, and she often ropes in the others to assist when applicable. But Heidi is a Ranaldian, she does things to be a Ranaldian, and she does them in Ranaldian ways. When Mathilde pauses and says 'I suppose so', it's because she has to consider her life through that lens, where all her behaviours go into one of four Ranaldian boxes instead of Ranald things being one tool in her belt. Her greatsword shenanigans go into the Protector box, instead of being a blend of her Stirlandian and Eight Peaks facets; her smug mysterious aura becomes a Deceiver trait instead of a Wizard thing; her stealth stuff becomes a Night Prowler situational usefulness instead of an application of her Wizard abilities. To the normal lens she uses to see herself, the Gambler stuff is the only purely Ranaldian expression of her character, and that's why she uses it to get Ranald's attention - because it's the facet that she normally doesn't throw herself fully into, so when she does it's an explicit act of devotion instead of just her natural vibes being Ranald-compatible.

No lens is necessarily correct or incorrect. In the same way that Heidi parses all of Mathilde through a purely Ranaldian lens, there are people that see her through a purely Wizardly one, or a purely Stirlandian one, or a purely Dwarf-y one, or an international diplomacy one, not because those are more correct lenses but because those are they are most accustomed to using, or because they're the ones they can see the clearest through, or because they're the ones most applicable to the task at hand.

Similarly, the Ducklings all started thriving once they escaped from the mono-Wizard mindset that was constricting them and 'multiclassed' into a mindset and worldview that allowed other facets of their person to flourish, which ended up not only making them better people but also better Wizards than even they had remained stuck in the constricted mindset that was stunting them. Panoramia (and this is something that is already on my mind for a conversation in the treehouse scene) isn't quite the same as the Ducklings - she is more fully a Wizard than them, but she is a better Wizard outside of a Wizarding context than she was inside of the one she was born into. Some trees grow well in dense vegetation, others need more room to spread their roots, as a Jade Wizard might put it. Max has faded into something of a minor character in the story and I've allowed him to do so without regret because the Wizard part of his life is a job for him - a job he likes and finds fulfilling, but it's the clock he punches to be able to pursue his true passion that is a purely academic pursuit of metalworking. More than pretty much any other character, Max knows what he wants out of life and how to get it. In a way he's kind of like Jerry from Parks and Recreation - he doesn't care how seriously he's taken at work because the job is one he can put down at the end of the day and return to the life he finds supremely fulfilling.

Johann is interesting, because he was driven to prove himself and in pursuing that with some dodgy secret squirrel deniable ops this parchment will self immolate in five seconds shit, he got caught up in Mathilde's wake and Mathilde took him deadly serious in his own right from day one. The thread's deep suspicion of his bullshit was actually the best thing that could happen for him because what he wanted most was to be taken that seriously. And it turns out that when he was already getting acceptance from outside the Gold Order, his obsession with becoming the very literal Golden Boy stopped seeming so meaningful, and then pursuing it anyway out of inertia went in a way that could be seen as extremely badly but could also be seen as not that big a deal. Also his boss took his golden bear ass to a place where a very influential subset of society religiously venerates physical perfection, and their species kind of tops out at twunk. Being actively desired does strange and powerful things to a soul that spent so long yearning just to be wanted.

And Egrimm? It is such a quiet thing, to fall. It begins inside, when you decide that the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune can only be put right by setting aside all that must not be set aside. But then if the slings and arrows are stopped, after you've marked all these things for setting aside but before you actually do the setting... what does that do to a person? Knowing what you're capable of, but also knowing that you didn't actually do anything worse than maneuver yourself into a position to do all those things that you didn't actually do? All of the doors that life had so unfairly barred have now swung open. You can just walk down them. Do you? Should you? Can you let yourself do so, knowing what you might have become? Should you even care about policing yourself when you were so recently so ready to do so much worse?

Did you actually fall?

Is that thing? Can you fall just a little bit? Can you just pick yourself up and dust yourself off and continue on the path? You look around expecting to see judgement, but apparently nobody even noticed. Mildly skinned knees hidden under clothes and already beginning to heal. You can just continue on without anybody ever knowing or ever needing to know, like nothing ever happened, because nothing did.

But it could have.

But it didn't.
 
This is the only one I don't see. She follows what she herself considers the spirit of the intent of the Vow. Namely "don't trick innocent people out of their money". But otherwise she lives in luxury and uses her wealth for her hobby. She eats well, drinks well, is used to top of the notch bathroom amenities and has her professional environment and transportation kited out with every conceivable comfort and utility. And all that on top of being an international landholder. I don't know how to interpret poverty into any of that.

I did enjoy the rest of your observations though.

She has had a vast river of gold pass through her fingers and not had it stick in a way that'd you'd be able to clearly say that yes, she has it. It's been spent on books that are now in a library she controls but does not own and research materials and infrastructure with at minimum dual-use.

Her idea of going on vacation is to leave for a few months to murder dark elves and even her very nice home doubles as part of a superweapon. It's complicated, in the best way.
 
Similarly, the Ducklings all started thriving once they escaped from the mono-Wizard mindset that was constricting them and 'multiclassed' into a mindset and worldview that allowed other facets of their person to flourish, which ended up not only making them better people but also better Wizards than even they had remained stuck in the constricted mindset that was stunting them.
So what you are saying is we should write a paper about this?
 
It's really funny that Mathilde could theoretically be seen that way too. Funny thing about that scene with mirror. Sure, we as voters never even considered it yet, but if chips came down and it came to her to sacrifice her honour and sanity or else see her kingdom (her friends) crumble and there was no other way, Mathilde could become terror that would make the world take notice or be made to take notice. All it stops her now is that there really is no necessity for it and the cost to the life she loves would be horrendous... But she could. Maybe ulgu can be made to whisper your name for eternity too
 
Last edited:
Voting is open
Back
Top