Voted best in category in the Users' Choice awards.
Voting is open
So what happens if the target of a grudge expires for unrelated reasons?
There is no exact rules for grudges as far as I know. Quite a bit depends on a grudge and target of grudge. If it's person it may be considered fulfiled - but if it's clan/nation/species, then it can be passed down other members of a clan/nation/species. It also very much depends what it is about.

Holding a grudge is almost an Art, at least for Dawi.
 
I'm not too sad about losing this vote. Sure, I voted to remain silent... But there's something satisfying about bragging too :D
And while it may be stupid, that's just another sign of Mathilde being a complete nincompoop beneath her Grey robes and wizard hat!
 
There is no exact rules for grudges as far as I know. Quite a bit depends on a grudge and target of grudge. If it's person it may be considered fulfiled - but if it's clan/nation/species, then it can be passed down other members of a clan/nation/species. It also very much depends what it is about.

Holding a grudge is almost an Art, at least for Dawi.
Dwarves have, on at least one occasion, passed grudges down bloodlines. That time they destroyed a small town for one of the town's ancestors underpaying them by like, 3 copper comes to mind.
 
Thori has a section copied out of Zhufbar's Book of Grudges for reference purposes and is radiating sublime satisfaction as he makes notes as to how many could be considered Avenged by the campaign, not only against the von Carsteins and their ilk but also a few relatively minor matters they still considered outstanding against the von Draks.
Emphasis mine, but it seems very old Grudges remain in the Book, until something eventually manages to account for them.
 
Well was more thinking gathering the waste from them as opposed to selling the gunpowder to them... Though don't their ships use cannons? Still I get the impression that we could massively improve gunpowder production with a full Empire's worth of waste. The knock-on effects of such being really incredibly big.


With Bretonnia I'm thinking more about the logistics of carting it back home. I'm at work and don't have my books handy, but if I recall right there's like A Mountain Range and Athel Loren between Bretonnia and the Empire. You'd probably end up shipping via sea, and that's a lot of product to move to the coast and back inland from Marienburg(if it wasn't just processed/sold from there). Big SHRUG on what the profit margins would be after transport.
 
if I recall, grudges are an emointal coping mechanism for the way dwarven memory works. Emotional intensity does not fade for dwarves, and their recall is perfect. So a wrong delt to them a hundred years ago stings exactly as much as one done to them today.

Grudges let them cope, because they can be sure wheels are in motion to balance the scales, so I guess how they handle a grudge target dying would depend on if they can find catharsis in it. for example, a man who stole a dwarves savings dying alone and penniless after similar actions came to light? that might satisfy a grudge because it has a feeling of satisfaction to it. but a guy who killed a dwarf just tripping down some stairs? less likely. While it is likely legalized to a large extent, It would make sense the laws follow the emotional purpose of grudges to an extent.
 
this vote was cancer.

Half of why I was losing my temper before I went to bed was because every time someone on the Silent side brought up a piece of information that backed them, one or two demagogues immediately rules lawyered as to why it 'Doesn't count', and then others dared to go "Oh I voted this way to punish the remain silent people for being generically awful (BTW this side never made mistakes I have no examples to give while I have a litany of sins for the other side)"

The absurd double-standarding while claiming virtue was disgusting. If you have to vote some place because your gut says it's the correct choice (And damned be the quotes and statements otherwise), fine, that's your perrogative--but claiming that you're doing it to punish the other side for not meeting some nebulous 'Standard of virtue' was insulting every time, doubly so all the people who went "Man these arguments are awful, all of the ones on the silent side were terrible so I'm voting for the speak side, which is clearly superior and virtuous"

I'm not sure what would be worse here honestly. The call being wrong and us paying a hefty price for no real gains (And it least discouraging that kind of 'Rules lawyering away every statement supporting full disclosure being a bad idea' nonsense)--or it being right and that kind of meta behaviour being encouraged to win debates in a massively inflated voter base.

At least the fucking cancer is in remission until the next time and hopefully I'll get time to start enjoying this quest again.

EDIT
(Though Boney's reassurance and suggestion here fills me with dread once again)
Do you think insulting people and calling them Cancer is going to help things?
 
this vote was cancer.

Half of why I was losing my temper before I went to bed was because every time someone on the Silent side brought up a piece of information that backed them, one or two demagogues immediately rules lawyered as to why it 'Doesn't count', and then others dared to go "Oh I voted this way to punish the remain silent people for being generically awful (BTW this side never made mistakes I have no examples to give while I have a litany of sins for the other side)"

The absurd double-standarding while claiming virtue was disgusting. If you have to vote some place because your gut says it's the correct choice (And damned be the quotes and statements otherwise), fine, that's your perrogative--but claiming that you're doing it to punish the other side for not meeting some nebulous 'Standard of virtue' was insulting every time, doubly so all the people who went "Man these arguments are awful, all of the ones on the silent side were terrible so I'm voting for the speak side, which is clearly superior and virtuous"

I'm not sure what would be worse here honestly. The call being wrong and us paying a hefty price for no real gains (And it least discouraging that kind of 'Rules lawyering away every statement supporting full disclosure being a bad idea' nonsense)--or it being right and that kind of meta behaviour being encouraged to win debates in a massively inflated voter base.

At least the fucking cancer is in remission until the next time and hopefully I'll get time to start enjoying this quest again.

EDIT
(Though Boney's reassurance and suggestion here fills me with dread once again)
It's good to know that when people say things you don't like you assume their lying liars who lie and manipulate to drag your virtuous and correct decision down. They couldn't have a point, or at least think they have a point after all.
 
It's one minute to deadline, so I guessed I might as well post a tally.

Unless I'm mistaken, the winning vote is:

Tell Belegar and Kragg

Cook with Panoramia and Titus
'Make sure the ale hasn't gone bad' with Skaroki

Gambling
Hold a Ranaldan religious service
Telling war stories

Yes to Shenanigans
Damn, 264 voters. Is that a record?
 
this vote was cancer.

Half of why I was losing my temper before I went to bed was because every time someone on the Silent side brought up a piece of information that backed them, one or two demagogues immediately rules lawyered as to why it 'Doesn't count', and then others dared to go "Oh I voted this way to punish the remain silent people for being generically awful (BTW this side never made mistakes I have no examples to give while I have a litany of sins for the other side)"

The absurd double-standarding while claiming virtue was disgusting. If you have to vote some place because your gut says it's the correct choice (And damned be the quotes and statements otherwise), fine, that's your perrogative--but claiming that you're doing it to punish the other side for not meeting some nebulous 'Standard of virtue' was insulting every time, doubly so all the people who went "Man these arguments are awful, all of the ones on the silent side were terrible so I'm voting for the speak side, which is clearly superior and virtuous"

I'm not sure what would be worse here honestly. The call being wrong and us paying a hefty price for no real gains (And it least discouraging that kind of 'Rules lawyering away every statement supporting full disclosure being a bad idea' nonsense)--or it being right and that kind of meta behaviour being encouraged to win debates in a massively inflated voter base.

At least the fucking cancer is in remission until the next time and hopefully I'll get time to start enjoying this quest again.

EDIT
(Though Boney's reassurance and suggestion here fills me with dread once again)

have you maybe considered that the people taking Umbridge with the conduct of one side might be doing so for legitimate reasons? rather than just being hypocritical fools?
 
I just want to say thanks to everyone who searched for and then cited sources. For a large part of the voting process I felt very much lost. It seemed as if (large parts) of both sides were just making one assertion after another. Without the actual sources it was just an exercise or either taking their interpretation on faith or trying to pick apart the vague accounts. Neither was a good option. The sources really helped provide a solid ground.

I've been here since almost the beginning of the thread. I'm pretty sure that I've read every page of it. But after this vote, I think I'm going to have to give up on participating in it. That sucks.
Haven't been here since the beginning, but I'll have to start skipping quite a bit if this continues.
So in-between vote close and update, I'd like others opinion of expanding our gong-farming niter producing industry as far as we can. Like throughout the empire at least, and possibly border princes and Britannia.
I think Roswita would have had a good legal basis for seizing the gong farms. She could have counted them as a part of the watch which had been illegally privatized by a greedy wizard. Might be remembering it wrong, though. I didn't pay it much attention during the second read through and the first one has been too long ago to remember clearly.
this vote was cancer.
Sorry if I've contributed to this. From some responses it seems my first few posts felt arrogant, which was not my intention. I've tried to word them better towards the end, but I think you were away from the thread at that point.
 
Last edited:
My position here is a bit odd, in truth. I had fun. Both with the quest and the arguing. Its why I engaged so much. And that's a rare thing.

I don't tend to participate in most of the quests I read. mostly I just read the updates, and stay away from the debates. I have seen a number of people vote out of spite, and a number of people show signs of suffering for participating.

As well as a number of wild accusations and general sniping, though nothing truly heinous, thankfully.

All in all I had fun. And while that shine is a bit marred by all the people who didn't have fun or suffered for it...well.
Its a quest. I'll second the QM. If you find the discussion begins to detract from the experience, try and step away.

The goal of this whole thing is to learn, enjoy ourselves, and engage in some communal storytelling with our QM leading the charge. There will be times, dark and bright. But none of that should poison your life.
 
With Bretonnia I'm thinking more about the logistics of carting it back home. I'm at work and don't have my books handy, but if I recall right there's like A Mountain Range and Athel Loren between Bretonnia and the Empire. You'd probably end up shipping via sea, and that's a lot of product to move to the coast and back inland from Marienburg(if it wasn't just processed/sold from there). Big SHRUG on what the profit margins would be after transport.

Depends where exactly you're going to and from. You can go round the mountains at Couronne, and thence through the wasteland, or cross the Pale Sisters. Or simply cross the Grey Mountains somewhere where you don't have to go through one of the deadliest forests in the Old World. Certainly not an easy task though.
 
have you maybe considered that the people taking Umbridge with the conduct of one side might be doing so for legitimate reasons? rather than just being hypocritical fools?
I he's mainly talking about people throwing around that 'Thats OOC' while at same time making a ton of OOC points themselves, which I'll admit did irk me quite a big.

That said this was a long argument and one that took place effectively over the place of two votes, that's going to be exhausting and anger inducing for anyone, so I'm not surprised by the bitter feelings.
 
have you maybe considered that the people taking Umbridge with the conduct of one side might be doing so for legitimate reasons? rather than just being hypocritical fools?

I'm more pointing out the hypocrisy involved with claiming one side has made every mistake while ignoring the bad practices of your own side, and then getting upset when it's pointed out.

I was very clear after all to point out that it was a small handful of people making these infuriating statements, but that the margin was so narrow that they were decisive. I've even admitted my side didn't always have the best arguments myself, because I am a grown adult who can self-reflect.

Why is it so hard to agree that some of your own were bad?

I just want this fucking behaviour to stop in the future. If you want to drive by vote? That's fine no matter how I grumble about it. If you want to just vote with your gut? That's fine too.

The cancer was the 'I'm voting this way to punish your side for not meeting my arbitrary standard of virtue' votes, which didn't even have the decency to be fair about it because they were perfectly fine with their side using the same tactics for their own foundation.
 
I spent a lot of my free time today reading this thread. If I wasn't eating, working, or sleeping, I was reading the thread. And I finally caught up to find out the vote had closed fifteen minutes ago.

I've been here since almost the beginning of the thread. I'm pretty sure that I've read every page of it. But after this vote, I think I'm going to have to give up on participating in it. That sucks.
I find that the trick is to not care about anyone else and only post for your own benefit.
 
Emphasis mine, but it seems very old Grudges remain in the Book, until something eventually manages to account for them.
Might be a bit different in that case though - IIRC the last Von Draks became vampires, and presumably when you're dealing with undead the grudge doesn't get written out until they're completely absolutely definitely dead for realsies this time.
 
Staff Notice - This is edging on Rule 3 for Incivility
I'm more pointing out the hypocrisy involved with claiming one side has made every mistake while ignoring the bad practices of your own side, and then getting upset when it's pointed out.

I was very clear after all to point out that it was a small handful of people making these infuriating statements, but that the margin was so narrow that they were decisive. I've even admitted my side didn't always have the best arguments myself, because I am a grown adult who can self-reflect.

Why is it so hard to agree that some of your own were bad?

I just want this fucking behaviour to stop in the future. If you want to drive by vote? That's fine no matter how I grumble about it. If you want to just vote with your gut? That's fine too.

The cancer was the 'I'm voting this way to punish your side for not meeting my arbitrary standard of virtue' votes, which didn't even have the decency to be fair about it because they were perfectly fine with their side using the same tactics for their own foundation.

that's a take for thrid parties criticizing your side. "your hypocrites! the other side has issues to! so they must be equally bad!" rather than, oh I don't know, taking a step back and looking to see if maybe there is a reason that one side is drawing more flack then the other.


but hey, i voted aginst your option, so I must be an idiot. so feel free to ignore me.
 
Guys, calm down. Vote is over.

Boney had a point - if reading discussion induces too much emotions, then it is better to not read discussion and focus on the story.
 
Voting is open
Back
Top