EDIT
(Though Boney's reassurance and suggestion here fills me with dread once again)
I haven't rolled any dice. I'm not even at that part yet. I'm still talking about Dwarves restoring the stonework of the Hall of the Moon.
EDIT
(Though Boney's reassurance and suggestion here fills me with dread once again)
There is no exact rules for grudges as far as I know. Quite a bit depends on a grudge and target of grudge. If it's person it may be considered fulfiled - but if it's clan/nation/species, then it can be passed down other members of a clan/nation/species. It also very much depends what it is about.So what happens if the target of a grudge expires for unrelated reasons?
Dwarves have, on at least one occasion, passed grudges down bloodlines. That time they destroyed a small town for one of the town's ancestors underpaying them by like, 3 copper comes to mind.There is no exact rules for grudges as far as I know. Quite a bit depends on a grudge and target of grudge. If it's person it may be considered fulfiled - but if it's clan/nation/species, then it can be passed down other members of a clan/nation/species. It also very much depends what it is about.
Holding a grudge is almost an Art, at least for Dawi.
Emphasis mine, but it seems very old Grudges remain in the Book, until something eventually manages to account for them.Thori has a section copied out of Zhufbar's Book of Grudges for reference purposes and is radiating sublime satisfaction as he makes notes as to how many could be considered Avenged by the campaign, not only against the von Carsteins and their ilk but also a few relatively minor matters they still considered outstanding against the von Draks.
Well was more thinking gathering the waste from them as opposed to selling the gunpowder to them... Though don't their ships use cannons? Still I get the impression that we could massively improve gunpowder production with a full Empire's worth of waste. The knock-on effects of such being really incredibly big.
Do you think insulting people and calling them Cancer is going to help things?this vote was cancer.
Half of why I was losing my temper before I went to bed was because every time someone on the Silent side brought up a piece of information that backed them, one or two demagogues immediately rules lawyered as to why it 'Doesn't count', and then others dared to go "Oh I voted this way to punish the remain silent people for being generically awful (BTW this side never made mistakes I have no examples to give while I have a litany of sins for the other side)"
The absurd double-standarding while claiming virtue was disgusting. If you have to vote some place because your gut says it's the correct choice (And damned be the quotes and statements otherwise), fine, that's your perrogative--but claiming that you're doing it to punish the other side for not meeting some nebulous 'Standard of virtue' was insulting every time, doubly so all the people who went "Man these arguments are awful, all of the ones on the silent side were terrible so I'm voting for the speak side, which is clearly superior and virtuous"
I'm not sure what would be worse here honestly. The call being wrong and us paying a hefty price for no real gains (And it least discouraging that kind of 'Rules lawyering away every statement supporting full disclosure being a bad idea' nonsense)--or it being right and that kind of meta behaviour being encouraged to win debates in a massively inflated voter base.
At least the fucking cancer is in remission until the next time and hopefully I'll get time to start enjoying this quest again.
EDIT
(Though Boney's reassurance and suggestion here fills me with dread once again)
It's good to know that when people say things you don't like you assume their lying liars who lie and manipulate to drag your virtuous and correct decision down. They couldn't have a point, or at least think they have a point after all.this vote was cancer.
Half of why I was losing my temper before I went to bed was because every time someone on the Silent side brought up a piece of information that backed them, one or two demagogues immediately rules lawyered as to why it 'Doesn't count', and then others dared to go "Oh I voted this way to punish the remain silent people for being generically awful (BTW this side never made mistakes I have no examples to give while I have a litany of sins for the other side)"
The absurd double-standarding while claiming virtue was disgusting. If you have to vote some place because your gut says it's the correct choice (And damned be the quotes and statements otherwise), fine, that's your perrogative--but claiming that you're doing it to punish the other side for not meeting some nebulous 'Standard of virtue' was insulting every time, doubly so all the people who went "Man these arguments are awful, all of the ones on the silent side were terrible so I'm voting for the speak side, which is clearly superior and virtuous"
I'm not sure what would be worse here honestly. The call being wrong and us paying a hefty price for no real gains (And it least discouraging that kind of 'Rules lawyering away every statement supporting full disclosure being a bad idea' nonsense)--or it being right and that kind of meta behaviour being encouraged to win debates in a massively inflated voter base.
At least the fucking cancer is in remission until the next time and hopefully I'll get time to start enjoying this quest again.
EDIT
(Though Boney's reassurance and suggestion here fills me with dread once again)
Damn, 264 voters. Is that a record?It's one minute to deadline, so I guessed I might as well post a tally.
Unless I'm mistaken, the winning vote is:
Tell Belegar and Kragg
Cook with Panoramia and Titus
'Make sure the ale hasn't gone bad' with Skaroki
Gambling
Hold a Ranaldan religious service
Telling war stories
Yes to Shenanigans
this vote was cancer.
Half of why I was losing my temper before I went to bed was because every time someone on the Silent side brought up a piece of information that backed them, one or two demagogues immediately rules lawyered as to why it 'Doesn't count', and then others dared to go "Oh I voted this way to punish the remain silent people for being generically awful (BTW this side never made mistakes I have no examples to give while I have a litany of sins for the other side)"
The absurd double-standarding while claiming virtue was disgusting. If you have to vote some place because your gut says it's the correct choice (And damned be the quotes and statements otherwise), fine, that's your perrogative--but claiming that you're doing it to punish the other side for not meeting some nebulous 'Standard of virtue' was insulting every time, doubly so all the people who went "Man these arguments are awful, all of the ones on the silent side were terrible so I'm voting for the speak side, which is clearly superior and virtuous"
I'm not sure what would be worse here honestly. The call being wrong and us paying a hefty price for no real gains (And it least discouraging that kind of 'Rules lawyering away every statement supporting full disclosure being a bad idea' nonsense)--or it being right and that kind of meta behaviour being encouraged to win debates in a massively inflated voter base.
At least the fucking cancer is in remission until the next time and hopefully I'll get time to start enjoying this quest again.
EDIT
(Though Boney's reassurance and suggestion here fills me with dread once again)
Haven't been here since the beginning, but I'll have to start skipping quite a bit if this continues.I've been here since almost the beginning of the thread. I'm pretty sure that I've read every page of it. But after this vote, I think I'm going to have to give up on participating in it. That sucks.
I think Roswita would have had a good legal basis for seizing the gong farms. She could have counted them as a part of the watch which had been illegally privatized by a greedy wizard. Might be remembering it wrong, though. I didn't pay it much attention during the second read through and the first one has been too long ago to remember clearly.So in-between vote close and update, I'd like others opinion of expanding our gong-farming niter producing industry as far as we can. Like throughout the empire at least, and possibly border princes and Britannia.
Sorry if I've contributed to this. From some responses it seems my first few posts felt arrogant, which was not my intention. I've tried to word them better towards the end, but I think you were away from the thread at that point.
With Bretonnia I'm thinking more about the logistics of carting it back home. I'm at work and don't have my books handy, but if I recall right there's like A Mountain Range and Athel Loren between Bretonnia and the Empire. You'd probably end up shipping via sea, and that's a lot of product to move to the coast and back inland from Marienburg(if it wasn't just processed/sold from there). Big SHRUG on what the profit margins would be after transport.
I he's mainly talking about people throwing around that 'Thats OOC' while at same time making a ton of OOC points themselves, which I'll admit did irk me quite a big.have you maybe considered that the people taking Umbridge with the conduct of one side might be doing so for legitimate reasons? rather than just being hypocritical fools?
have you maybe considered that the people taking Umbridge with the conduct of one side might be doing so for legitimate reasons? rather than just being hypocritical fools?
I find that the trick is to not care about anyone else and only post for your own benefit.I spent a lot of my free time today reading this thread. If I wasn't eating, working, or sleeping, I was reading the thread. And I finally caught up to find out the vote had closed fifteen minutes ago.
I've been here since almost the beginning of the thread. I'm pretty sure that I've read every page of it. But after this vote, I think I'm going to have to give up on participating in it. That sucks.
Yeah, my posts are mainly for collecting Funny ratings now, it seems. Even when I don't mean them that way.I find that the trick is to not care about anyone else and only post for your own benefit.
Might be a bit different in that case though - IIRC the last Von Draks became vampires, and presumably when you're dealing with undead the grudge doesn't get written out until they're completely absolutely definitely dead for realsies this time.Emphasis mine, but it seems very old Grudges remain in the Book, until something eventually manages to account for them.
I'm more pointing out the hypocrisy involved with claiming one side has made every mistake while ignoring the bad practices of your own side, and then getting upset when it's pointed out.
I was very clear after all to point out that it was a small handful of people making these infuriating statements, but that the margin was so narrow that they were decisive. I've even admitted my side didn't always have the best arguments myself, because I am a grown adult who can self-reflect.
Why is it so hard to agree that some of your own were bad?
I just want this fucking behaviour to stop in the future. If you want to drive by vote? That's fine no matter how I grumble about it. If you want to just vote with your gut? That's fine too.
The cancer was the 'I'm voting this way to punish your side for not meeting my arbitrary standard of virtue' votes, which didn't even have the decency to be fair about it because they were perfectly fine with their side using the same tactics for their own foundation.
Indeed. Around ninety pages of discussion since that update, it moved at a staggering pace.That said this was a long argument and one that took place effectively over the place of two votes,