I am very glad I'm not the one who has to make sense of the vote results.
Whoops!
or maybe Mathilde just gets fucking hammered.could I suggest switching some of those drinking votes to Mathilde showing up already buzzed when the celebration starts from drinking with the Thane and being super weepy and maudlin? because I will continue to fight for this blessed vote option until the end of days. It's too good.
I might just be able to sway a whole 1% of the vote if I keep posting on every page of discussion, determination
also absolutely acceptable. I'm basically happy with any humorous yet heartwarming situation where Mathilde doesn't go full priest of Ranald on this celebration (which to be fair is still pretty humorous and celebratory, so I won't be upset with that, but there are so many possibilities here.)
Sure, just more into his aspects of the Gambler and maybe the Protector. Not so much the Night-Prowler or Deceiver.Is it really a shrine to Ranald if it's built with the knowledge and consent of the authorities, though?
For what gain?
Then we'd need to build a second shrine to those aspects, in secret, I guess.Sure, just more into his aspects of the Gambler and maybe the Protector. Not so much the Night-Prowler or Deceiver.
That should be Remain silent, makes the tally easier[x] Keep silent
[x] Join the hunting with Maximilian
[x] Join the hunting with Codrin
[x] Join the hunting with Sigwald Kriegersen
[x] Join the hunting with Ruprecht Wulfhart
[x] 'Make sure the ale hasn't gone bad' with Skaroki
and ultimately, while I agree with you, targeting someone to explain their vote when their not part of the discussion and is just voting is rude and a bit bullying.
I think it might be a bit rude if the vote for tell/stay silent wasn't literally turning on one or two votes. Like, if that person swapped to 'Remain Silent' then there'd be a perfect tie between that and 'Tell Belegar and Kragg." When it's both that close and that contentious, I think it's understandable for people to want to gently prod voters a little. Not that I'd ever single anyone out of course.and ultimately, while I agree with you, targeting someone to explain their vote when their not part of the discussion and is just voting is rude and a bit bullying.
Uninformed voting can hurt quests. More relevantly, I'm not even the first person to do it today, so I would appreciate not being singled out.and ultimately, while I agree with you, targeting someone to explain their vote when their not part of the discussion and is just voting is rude and a bit bullying.
There's pretty much no way this os a good idea. There are only potential downsides and no real potential upsides. It's a pure expected loss with the best we can do is lose nothing and the distribution of events being over different degrees of badness, from pretty bad to utterly catastrophic.
Panoramia doesn't need a peace offering. She needs to be given a good long time to contemplate her screw up and resolve not to do it again.