- Pronouns
- He/Him
A confirmed GM statement. He just did us the biggest solid ever, and people want to fail at worshiping him right after?
That's not just kind of silly, it's unfair to the god himself.
A confirmed GM statement. He just did us the biggest solid ever, and people want to fail at worshiping him right after?
That's not a tenent he has.character who is close to their god breaks a core tenet of don't tell non-Ranaldites you're a Ranaldite to tattle on his latest hist.
Do you often explode into demons when you don't do your job perfectly? Just checking.
So? An aspect is still a part of the overall god. The Deciever is still Ranald in whole.That's not a tenant he has, it's just something the thread has gotten into their heads and refuses to let go of.
He says 'Don't tell people you worship the Deceiver, because good liars don't admit it.' He happens to have three other faces that have no proscription whatsoever against indiscretion.
…Are you unironicly doing double-think right now?That's not a tenant he has.
He says 'Don't tell people you worship the Deceiver, because good liars don't admit it.' He happens to have three other faces that have no proscription whatsoever against indiscretion.
True, but don't tell people you worship me is not an absolute prohibition anyways. If it was, he'd already be out of worshipers, and even weaker than he already is. Or completely unknown outside of an extremely secretive cult. Just the fact that people know he's a god who exists shows there's leeway in this matter.So? An aspect is still a part of the overall god. The Deciever is still Ranald in whole.
She needs more information, and minus another mind packet, this is the only way she gets it. It isn't like there's another Magister she can talk to about whether this is actually important or not, so trustworthy second bests it is.
I have a problem with wizards who aren't dead sure about their limits, yeah. We have some safety net, as the protagonist, but we've seen all kinds of much better mages than Pan die instantly on a rolled 1.I mean, this is literally every wizard every all the time. (Until they've rolled the dice enough that some of the simpler stuff is ok, but you don't get that without rolling dice.) If your argument applies to every wizard every time they cast, you have a problem with wizards, not with Pan.
Yes she does. She has the Grey College. She's not going to forget what happened between now and whenever we return.I mean, this is literally every wizard every all the time. (Until they've rolled the dice enough that some of the simpler stuff is ok, but you don't get that without rolling dice.) If your argument applies to every wizard every time they cast, you have a problem with wizards, not with Pan.
[X] Tell Belegar and Kragg.
She needs more information, and minus another mind packet, this is the only way she gets it. It isn't like there's another Magister she can talk to about whether this is actually important or not, so trustworthy second bests it is.
You know we had those whole things where we set up the Stirland Watch and everybody in our fief as worshipers of the guy, right? And one of the options is for a Ranaldite religious service?So? An aspect is still a part of the overall god. The Deciever is still Ranald in whole.
Double , more like.
will point to the GM statement above your postThat's not a tenant he has.
He says 'Don't tell people you worship the Deceiver, because good liars don't admit it.' He happens to have three other faces that have no proscription whatsoever against indiscretion.
Think Revolver Ocelot convincing himself "yeah I am possessed by my man crush's dead son" while also not being possessed.More seriously, I don't even know what that means. Could you clarify?
Can you explain why she needs more information RIGHT NOW ?
Because I don't quite see why anything would be relevant before she could get to the Grey order and peruse some records.
I have a problem with wizards who aren't dead sure about their limits, yeah. We have some safety net, as the protagonist, but we've seen all kinds of much better mages than Pan die instantly on a rolled 1.
I recently reread the Drakenhof arc, and holy cow those miscasts. I wonder if that town is still on fire from when Jovi exploded?
That's not a tenant he has.
He says 'Don't tell people you worship the Deceiver, because good liars don't admit it.' He happens to have three other faces that have no proscription whatsoever against indiscretion.
The least-known guise of Ranald is Ranald the Deceiver, God of Irony and Illusion, Charlatans and Tricksters, favoured by spies, liars, con artists, and Grey Wizards. He smiles on attempts to outwit and outfox your enemies, though he smiles just as readily on suitably entertaining failures. To openly admit to worshipping him is to fail at doing so, as no true liar admits to being one, so worship of this guise tends to be more personal and uncodified than even that of Ranald's other followers.
As stands, the risk-assessment from the weakening of Mork will be inaccurate, as they are assuming it was caused through carelessness on Mork's part rather than enemy action. Furthermore, the magnitude of harm (and thus desire on their part to redress it) is likely to be underestimated, as much of the power was pulled rather than being left on the table. While it is unlikely that the Dwarves will discover that we withheld information from them, as the unpredictability of the Greenskins means just about any reaction falls within the bounds of possibility for them, keeping it from them is still putting our allies at risk.
While there are both OOC and (some) IC reasons to keep the dwarves in the dark about the ultimate source of these issues, I am very much not a fan of giving them the mushroom treatment.
Mate, look at the update. This isn't being treated as an important effect on the campaign, they barely care. There is no talk of "Mork is weakened" beyond us mentioning it and Kragg saying it's possible.As stands, the risk-assessment from the weakening of Mork will be inaccurate, as they are assuming it was caused through carelessness on Mork's part rather than enemy action. Furthermore, the magnitude of harm (and thus desire on their part to redress it) is likely to be underestimated, as much of the power was pulled rather than being left on the table. While it is unlikely that the Dwarves will discover that we withheld information from them, as the unpredictability of the Greenskins means just about any reaction falls within the bounds of possibility for them, keeping it from them is still putting our allies at risk.
While there are both OOC and (some) IC reasons to keep the dwarves in the dark about the ultimate source of these issues, I am very much not a fan of giving them the mushroom treatment.
... Doesn't mean she shouldn't try to keep from summoning giant demon-maggots?I mean, this kinda proves the point. Any wizard, any time: it's a good idea to play it as safe as you can, but there isn't anything actually like 'safe'. Expecting a journeyman to live up to a standard a Magister can't is kinda stupid.