Voted best in category in the Users' Choice awards.
Voting is open
Is Belegar the youngest Dwarf king then? And who would be the oldest? Ungrim Ironfist, maybe? He was the favourite for High King 200 years ago.

... Man, that would have been wild if the Slayer King became the High King instead of Grudgey McGrudgeface.

I think King Byrrnoth of Barak Varr might be younger, having only very recently avenged his father and ascended the throne. As for oldest, Ungrim's probably the best candidate, but there's next to no canonical information about the King of Zhufbar so it's hard to say for sure.
 
I think King Byrrnoth of Barak Varr might be younger, having only very recently avenged his father and ascended the throne. As for oldest, Ungrim's probably the best candidate, but there's next to no canonical information about the King of Zhufbar so it's hard to say for sure.
So I assume the King who cooperated with Sea Lord Aislinn to fight against a common enemy was Byrrnoth's father rather than Byrrnoth himself? or did that event just not happen? The 8th edition timeline says it happened 2281 IC.

The timeline is wonky so I understand you having to make adjustments.

EDIT: The description says "King Grunkadrakk" so I assume it's Byrrnoth, since Grunkadrakk is a title and I don't think any other king killed a sea dragon/merwyrm.
 
I can't be the only one wondering if Mathilda is at risk of exploding due to the sheer amount of magical items and energy routinely flowing through her body.
 
So I assume the King who cooperated with Sea Lord Aislinn to fight against a common enemy was Byrrnoth's father rather than Byrrnoth himself? or did that event just not happen? The 8th edition timeline says it happened 2281 IC.

The timeline is wonky so I understand you having to make adjustments.

EDIT: The description says "King Grunkadrakk" so I assume it's Byrrnoth, since Grunkadrakk is a title and I don't think any other king killed a sea dragon/merwyrm.

If it becomes important to the story I'll start searching for copies of a magazine article from sixteen years ago to find the canonical details of Byrrnoth's life and family. Right now I'm operating on memories of a small amount of research I did years ago.
 
I can't be the only one wondering if Mathilda is at risk of exploding due to the sheer amount of magical items and energy routinely flowing through her body.
Most of the magic doesn't go through her. Her robes are externally focused, more like armor. The Belt gives her a protectinve coating but it's runework, which is something Dwarves made. They know better than to shove raw magic energy into someone since that's a death sentence for Dwarves. The sword is fully external and doesn't run through her. The only thing that directly runs through her magically is the Seed, and only when it heals her. Any resultant Dhar is burnt off by the belt.

Mathilde's been pretty careful about magical enchantments, mostly because Boney instructs us not to mess too much with that stuff and tries to be reasonable.
 
In this version, what is the source of the apparently frequent peasant uprisings? Oppression not related to food? Or just the perception of abuse during any natural food shortage, where nobles of course don't adjust their diet, but less food comes out of the palace.

There aren't frequent peasant uprisings, because a society with frequent peasant uprisings doesn't last fifteen centuries.

Could be both.

Some lords may be kind of a dick and apportion food in a way that certain peasants see as unfair. Say, massively screwing over Village A while over-rewarding Village B, either because they're bad at math or because Village B is where the family of the servant girl His Lordship is boinking on the side lives or whatever.

Some lords may require the peasants to do too much corvee labor "in exchange for" the food that they distribute. Custom entitles the nobles to command the peasants to do forty days' labor working on road maintenance, the upkeep of fortresses, and so on, but then this one asshole wants giant castles over all of the everywhere and he's working the peasants so hard there's no one left to farm.

Some lords may mishandle the tax receipts, run up a giant gambling debt, and sell a third of the province's harvests to Empire grain merchants to pay it off. Then you get the great Wait You Did WHAT Revolt.

Ehhhh.

[waggles hand]

It depends on how you define "society" and "last." In a society with frequent peasant uprisings, something has to give sooner or later.

But I can imagine a Bretonnia that sort of cyclically "resets from default," where if you're paying attention over long enough timescales you see periods of the chivalric lordly system working well, interspersed by periods of it working poorly and resulting in some combination of peasant uprisings and Knight Errants battling Black Knights.

Until the current rulership loses the Mandate of Heaven favor of the Lady and is replaced.

In principle you could even see this circulating around in different duchies and so on, with some in the 'good' phase and some in the 'bad' phase at any one time, at least except for when the king happens to be particularly good at his job and able to go all King Arthur on the miscreants.

As a side note, Palace Economy also tends to obfuscate where the problem is, if the lord is not on the ball with regards to administration - all the resources go to the lord, and then is redistributed, so if there is a systematic problem or a famine, the first apparent sign would very often be the public perception of the lord as Greedy(demanding resources beyond the norm to fulfill needs elsewhere) or Miserly(not having enough float to redistribute).

Which does mean that if an area is suffering a drought, soil exhaustion or overpopulation would often have the peasants complaining to whichever knights errant are in the area, challenge and try to replace the lord, but whoever takes over would not be any better an administrator(worse in some respects really), so once whatever blessings of the Lady triggered by the chivalrous act wears through and the population rises back to its previous point after the fighting, a persistent problem would recur.

That could give a "frequent" rebellion perception.

On paper, Mathilde speaks Tar-Eltharin. In reality, Mathilde speaks Teclis-Eltharin plus two centuries of an unknown amount of Grey Order drift. Mathilde speaking Eltharin would probably sound odd to literally everyone but other Grey Wizards. And 'Tar-Eltharin' itself probably doesn't exist - Ulthuan has ten kingdoms, has had eleven Phoenix Kings from six of those kingdoms, and has the Everqueen providing a cultural counterbalance, which would prevent any regional dialect from achieving dominance. The closest thing to a 'pure' Tar-Eltharin would probably be the Lothern dialect: a blend of the Eataine dialect with influences from Avelorn (from the Everqueen) and Caledor, Yvresse, and Saphery (from having supplied eight of the Phoenix Kings). But Teclis is from Cothique. 'His' accent, and therefore Mathilde's, would probably be more familiar to Marienburgers than it would be to Lothernites.

Yen-Eltharin would probably be a lot closer to the Eltharin of the Golden Age than Tar-Eltharin. Laurelorn is very isolationist, has had only four leaders, each of which was raised by their predecessor, and has a very concentrated population, all of which makes for a lot less cultural drift. The only 'foreign' influence would be fragments of Forestborn slang leaking through.

The written script of Eltharin is logographic, and so the original lexicon would be unchanged, but there would have had to be a lot of additions over the years for neologisms. This would probably be the biggest obstacle to communciation between the different Elven populations - for each concept that the original Eltharin didn't cover but has needed covering since then, each of the populations would have had to decide for themselves whether to ignore it, describe it using existing words, or coin a new word and therefore new character for it. The modern Yen-Eltharin lexicon is probably noticeably smaller than any of the other dialects due to their isolationism reducing the amount of new concepts they would have encountered and needed to coin words for over the years.

But despite all that the dialects are all mutually intelligible, and Mathilde would be able to understand and be understood by speakers of any of the dialects. There just seems to be less linguistic drift in the setting than in reality, possibly because of pretty much all the languages having either Old One or Daemonic or both in their bones, and so the words aren't arbitrary sounds that have been assigned meaning pretty much at random, they carry a hint of genuine conceptual resonance that gives the languages more sticking power.
Sounds very similar to how the chinese dialects work out.
 
On paper, Mathilde speaks Tar-Eltharin. In reality, Mathilde speaks Teclis-Eltharin plus two centuries of an unknown amount of Grey Order drift.
Is there such a big divide between the dialects of the eight Orders as to be noticeable in casual speech between them? We know that there are cross College classes even among magical subjects and Teclis-Eltharin shouldn't even be a secret they kept from outsiders like the University of Altdorf. Plus, for those who want to actually be able to speak it instead of using it only the way doctors use Latin IRL they'd want to exercise it. For which meetings with other fluent Wizards would be normal.
 
Is there such a divide between the dialects of the eight Orders? We know that there are cross College classes even among magical subjects and Teclis-Eltharin shouldn't even be a secret they kept from outsiders like the University of Altdorf. Plus, for those who want to actually be able to speak it instead of using it only the way doctors use Latin IRL they'd want to exercise it. For which meetings with other fluent Wizards would be normal.

The other Orders don't have any reason to learn or teach Eltharin. The Grey Order learns Eltharin to craft ciphers that have different meanings whether they're translated back using Lungua Praestantia or Eltharin.
 
I think King Byrrnoth of Barak Varr might be younger, having only very recently avenged his father and ascended the throne. As for oldest, Ungrim's probably the best candidate, but there's next to no canonical information about the King of Zhufbar so it's hard to say for sure.

For some reason, I find it hard to imagine the King of Zhufbar being an older dwarf. Both Gotri and Thori are pretty radical, with Thori being very casual with guild secrets during the Stirland campaign, so I imagine Barundin has a similar attitude, and the idea of a dwarf who is both radical and old is... startling.

I don't know how the Slayer king oath thing works.

The answer to this is that it doesn't work. That's the problem, it's two mutually exclusive oaths. How the High King oath would intersect with it is completely unknown. How many times does a High King need to put the needs of the Karaz Ankor over their home, or vice versa? That must be a significant test of their honour and integrity. Then throw in the Slayer Oath and you've got a highly explosive cocktail of drama there.
 
The answer to this is that it doesn't work. That's the problem, it's two mutually exclusive oaths. How the High King oath would intersect with it is completely unknown. How many times does a High King need to put the needs of the Karaz Ankor over their home, or vice versa? That must be a significant test of their honour and integrity. Then throw in the Slayer Oath and you've got a highly explosive cocktail of drama there.
But surely once upon a time the Slayer oath and whatever the oath of being King of Karak Kadrim where separate mutually exclusive oaths..
 
But surely once upon a time the Slayer oath and whatever the oath of being King of Karak Kadrim where separate mutually exclusive oaths..
They still are... Which is why the slayer oath has not yet been fulfilled after 8 generations.

The slayer must seek death, but the king must survive to lead the hold to prosper.
So Ungrim has to seek death, while wearing the best armour Karak Kadrin can provide, surrounded by hammerers.

And if he comes close, the hammerers are then sworn to keep him alive.
 
They still are... Which is why the slayer oath has not yet been fulfilled after 8 generations.

The slayer must seek death, but the king must survive to lead the hold to prosper.
So Ungrim has to seek death, while wearing the best armour Karak Kadrin can provide, surrounded by hammerers.

And if he comes close, the hammerers are then sworn to keep him alive.
But Slayer oaths aren't usually heritable, so would this mean the next high king has to become a Slayer?
 
But Slayer oaths aren't usually heritable, so would this mean the next high king has to become a Slayer?

No, it would be inherited by the heir of Clan Drakebeard, which is Ungrim's son Garagrim Ironfist (who, in Storm of Chaos, chose to preemptively inherit the Slayer Oath before his father died, liberating the clan from the Slayer Oath).

Edit: Wait, hang on, I'm assuming that all High Kings are elected, but I don't actually know if that's true, or if it's just because the last one didn't have a declared heir. If the High King is an inheritable title, then it's likely the same person would inherit both it and the Slayer Oath.
 
Last edited:
From what I remember Byrrnoth was supposed to be relatively old - about the same as Ungrim and Thorgrim. He spent a lot of time hunting for that sea drake.

Recently ascending to the throne isn't a good indicator since the old king could have well been a Longbeard or Greatbeard that got married young (for a Dawi because royalty) and had children relatively early.


For some reason, I find it hard to imagine the King of Zhufbar being an older dwarf. Both Gotri and Thori are pretty radical, with Thori being very casual with guild secrets during the Stirland campaign, so I imagine Barundin has a similar attitude, and the idea of a dwarf who is both radical and old is... startling.

Gotri is already a Master level engineer so that puts some limits to how young the King of Zhufbar can be - he's either on the older side of Fullbeards or a Longbeard (or possibly older but that's rare).

Considering Zhufbar is the innovating Hold - at least in engineering - them being more inclined to be open with some secrets makes sense since they're constantly inventing new stuff so obsolete centuries old stuff that other 'lesser' engineers guilds also have can be considered already so common and unimportant that it can be traded away.
 
No, it would be inherited by the heir of Clan Drakebeard, which is Ungrim's son Garagrim Ironfist (who, in Storm of Chaos, chose to preemptively inherit the Slayer Oath before his father died, liberating the clan from the Slayer Oath).

Edit: Wait, hang on, I'm assuming that all High Kings are elected, but I don't actually know if that's true, or if it's just because the last one didn't have a declared heir. If the High King is an inheritable title, then it's likely the same person would inherit both it and the Slayer Oath.

It's poorly explained in canon, Thorgrim got the throne because of an election after the previous High King died without heirs, but it's not really said how that would work if someone who was already a King won. Would they rule over both holds? Would their son inherit both holds? What about if they died without heirs, would the High King election mean someone new also gets both holds? The easy hand-wave is to say that it's never actually happened, except for part of Karak Eight Peaks' lore that says that their Kings had been High Kings multiple times before the Time of Woes... but it doesn't say who and it's hard to find enough space in the High King timeline to crowbar in a few previously unmentioned K8P Kings or an explanation for why it's changed so often, which implies a lot of High Kings dying without heirs in what was supposed to have been the Golden Age of the Dwarves. Maybe it used to be elected each generation and it only became inherited after the Time of Woes shattered the Underway and made travelling to decide a new High King too dangerous?

In any case, the Slayer Oath wouldn't 'stick' to the High King position - it would stay with the family line until it was fulfilled or the family was made extinct.
 
Last edited:
It's poorly explained in canon, Thorgrim got the throne because of an election after the previous High King died without heirs, but it's not really said how that would work if someone who was already a King won. Would they rule over both holds? Would their son inherit both holds? What about if they died without heirs, would the High King election mean someone new also gets both holds? The easy hand-wave is to say that it's never actually happened, except for part of Karak Eight Peaks' lore that says that their Kings had been High Kings multiple times before the Time of Woes... but it doesn't say who and it's hard to find enough space in the High King timeline to crowbar in a few previously unmentioned K8P Kings or an explanation for why it's changed so often, which implies a lot of High Kings dying without heirs in what was supposed to have been the Golden Age of the Dwarves. Maybe it used to be elected each generation and it only became inherited after the Time of Woes shattered the Underway and made travelling to decide a new High King too dangerous?

In any case, the Slayer Oath wouldn't 'stick' to the High King position - it would stay with the family line until it was fulfilled or the family was made extinct.
What if the High Kingship wasnt tied to Everpeak officially.

So if Ungrim had won, then he would have been High King and Thorgrim just 'King Thorgrim'. And the throne of power and Book of Grudges would have been transported to Karak Kadrin in for the time.
 
What if the High Kingship wasnt tied to Everpeak officially.

So if Ungrim had won, then he would have been High King and Thorgrim just 'King Thorgrim'

I don't see how it would be possible for the two to be separate. The Dwarven calendar marks Valaya taking up residence in Karaz-a-Karak as Year 1. The Karaz Ankor's collective Book of Grudges and the historical archives and the Throne of Power are kept there. There is no separate crown of Karaz-a-Karak, just the Dragon Crown of the High King. There's just no getting around that Karaz-a-Karak is the heart of the Karaz Ankor, and that the High King has always been the King of Karaz-a-Karak.
 
Ok, so this is very interesting:

"The white, limestone caves of Zamak Spayenya hide many primitive paintings from a forgotten era. Most depict hunting scenes that feature stylised animals, including bear, elk, deer, and horses; but these animals are not hunted by men: they are hunted by great, winged centaurs.

Some Kislevite scholars believe these to be the Scythian people that once inhabited the oblast, but others bitterly argue against this. Instead, they claim the Scythians were Humans who used centaurs as a metaphor to show man and horse were inseparable, and wings to signify galloping at great speed."

The Scythians are one of the two tribes that created the "Ogham Stones" (the supporting henge networks made by humans in the Waystone network) alognside the Belthani. In DL, the Kurgan say they are the inheritors of the Scythians and we don't know if it's because of conquest or something else. The Roppsmen and Gospodar also say they're descended from them but we don't know much about that, and the Roppsmen are mostly absorbed by the Ungol at this point.

They also apparently have depictions of winged centaurs, and they're depicted in a manner that seems to be positive, so I doubt they were representing Centigors.
 
It's poorly explained in canon, Thorgrim got the throne because of an election after the previous High King died without heirs, but it's not really said how that would work if someone who was already a King won. Would they rule over both holds? Would their son inherit both holds? What about if they died without heirs, would the High King election mean someone new also gets both holds? The easy hand-wave is to say that it's never actually happened, except for part of Karak Eight Peaks' lore that says that their Kings had been High Kings multiple times before the Time of Woes... but it doesn't say who and it's hard to find enough space in the High King timeline to crowbar in a few previously unmentioned K8P Kings or an explanation for why it's changed so often, which implies a lot of High Kings dying without heirs in what was supposed to have been the Golden Age of the Dwarves. Maybe it used to be elected each generation and it only became inherited after the Time of Woes shattered the Underway and made travelling to decide a new High King too dangerous?

In any case, the Slayer Oath wouldn't 'stick' to the High King position - it would stay with the family line until it was fulfilled or the family was made extinct.
Maybe in the past Karaz-a-Karak was not the undisputed dwarf capital and the (possible) times the king of K8P was high king Karaz-a-Karak's title as dwarf capital was successfully disputed.
 
IIRC Teclis would have still been in double digits at that point. I haven't fully researched the matter but so far my impression of the Elven life cycle is that it would be heavily classist, and Elven farmers and shopkeeps and whatnot probably have the similar life stages to Dwarves but the nobility are considered to be children for a lot longer. Dwarves have a similar dynamic, in that in any other profession Belegar would be considered of respectable age but he's still seen as young for a King by many.
This is all from the Tyrion and Teclis trilogy, but in canon, Teclis was born in 2157 IC and was therefore 143 when he headed off to the Old World. Interestingly, the series also had the twins move to Lothern at 16 (and get presented to court), and then Teclis spent an unknown but significant amount of time becoming a Loremaster, which he accomplished by the time the Druchii invasion of Ulthuan began.
 
Voting is open
Back
Top