Voted best in category in the Users' Choice awards.
Voting is open
As more tones sound, the High King's smile grows. "That which is wrong with the world that we cannot fix with the blades of our axes, we shall surely rebuild."
As much as I'm catching up on my reading of the Warhammer books, I'm still a Warhammer noob. So I didn't realise the significance of this line until just now, when I cracked open the 8th edition Dwarf Army book. In there, Thorgrim has a quote that says:

"That which is wrong with the world that we cannot fix with the blades of our axes, we shall surely avenge."

I didn't realise that Boney took a canon line from him and changed it to reflect his current mentality, but now that I do I like it so much more.
 
The Waystones, constructed jointly by the Ancestor Gods and Elven Archmages, protect our land from the threat of demonkind and twisting influence of the realm they call home.

Note that as far as we know, the first generation Waystones were built by the elves alone; and that the second were built by the Runesmiths Guild and Elven Archmages after the Ancestor Gods departed, but apart from that, well done.

This is actually a really important political point, as it shows that even shortly after the Ancestor Gods departed the dwaves were developing new (magi)tech rather than relying on the Ancestor's inventions. It's one of the strongest supports for the Radicals, that even the children of and other dwarves who personally knew the Ancestors did this, which would be incredibly radical today. It potentially says so very interesting things about the Rune of Pride, but that's something that we don't know enough about to say anything definitive on.
 
Last edited:
I'm not serious, but it's entirely possible that Thorek (Or any pious dwarf) sees it that way.

Karak Azul endured for three millennia separated from Karaz Ankor, beset by enemies, and it survived.
Karaz Ghumzul declared independence from Karaz Ankor, and broke. Who else knows what other traditions they broke when they declared independence?
They definitely don't see it that way, because the Chaos Dwarfs exist. The fact they also abandoned everything else the Dwarfs like doesn't stop them being secessionists, although whether Ghumzul stings more because they're retained a lot of the Karaz Ankor's traditions or not I couldn't say.
 
They definitely don't see it that way, because the Chaos Dwarfs exist. The fact they also abandoned everything else the Dwarfs like doesn't stop them being secessionists, although whether Ghumzul stings more because they're retained a lot of the Karaz Ankor's traditions or not I couldn't say.
I'm not sure he was saying they're the only secessionists?

They are only secessionists that broke apart from Grungni's Karaz Ankor.

It reads to me like he's saying "well, they're only secessionists", in a sarcastic manner.


As to the vote, I just hope no one thinks all of this will be without cost. Consequences will arrive.

[x] [ARM] Johann
[x] [THOREK] Karaz Ghumzul
 
They definitely don't see it that way, because the Chaos Dwarfs exist. The fact they also abandoned everything else the Dwarfs like doesn't stop them being secessionists, although whether Ghumzul stings more because they're retained a lot of the Karaz Ankor's traditions or not I couldn't say.
I don't see it as a mutually exclusive.

Karaz Ghumzul defected, and fell to nothingness in short order
The Dwarfs of Zorn Uzkul defected, turned to worship the ruinous powers and plague us to this day.

So Ghumzul dwarfs are a lesser evil, because they fell and joined an allied polity, and their grudges can be repaid monetarily, and will be pursued after more serious grudges are settled.
Chaos dwarfs are enemy number 1, because they seceded, succeeded and spite Karaz Ankor with their blasphemous practices, and the grudges against them will be pursued relentlessly, given the chance.

It's also likely that the Karaz Ankor already tried to destroy the Chaos Dwarfs during the golden age, failed, while taking grievous losses, which increased the grudge of blasphemy to a much more serious one.
 
[X] [THOREK] Both
[X] [ARM] Johann

It potentially says so very interesting things about the Rune of Pride, but that's something that we don't know enough about to say anything definitive on.
How come? The Rule of Pride has no bearing on whether or not you're making up new runes altogether, just that you don't ever put anything short of your best efforts and finest materials you have on hand into your work. It only demands that you never use your runecraft to make anything besides masterworks.
 
[X] [ARM] Johann

[X] [THOREK] Both

The dwarves hold keys they will never use. Better someone who will gets their hands on them, if only because to do otherwise is a waste.

As for the runesmithing guild? Thorek clearly intends to do this anyway. We are simply giving him what he needs early.
 
How come? The Rule of Pride has no bearing on whether or not you're making up new runes altogether, just that you don't ever put anything short of your best efforts and finest materials you have on hand into your work. It only demands that you never use your runecraft to make anything besides masterworks.
Well, no, the Rule of Pride is to not make the same runic item multiple times.
 
Well, no, the Rule of Pride is to not make the same runic item multiple times.
Which means there were either Runesmiths that didn't abide to the rule of pride so strictly,
Or there were enough Runesmiths to create all the Generation 2 waystones without breaking the Rule of Pride.
Or that the level of Runecraft was so high, that Apprentices (who are allowed to repeat runes and duplicate work) could make Waystones
 
How come? The Rule of Pride has no bearing on whether or not you're making up new runes altogether, just that you don't ever put anything short of your best efforts and finest materials you have on hand into your work. It only demands that you never use your runecraft to make anything besides masterworks.
Sadly, that take on the Rule of Pride is from RHUNRIKKI STROLLAR, which is set during an era where Dwarves weren't anywhere near as self-destructively conservative, and Snorri has actively undermined the ideological predecessors of this era's runelords.

Here in this era, the Rule of Pride is as follows:

No more than one item may carry the same combination of runes. This restriction also applies to the use of single runes. Creating runic items takes a great deal of effort, and Runesmiths don't like repeating themselves. Nor do they copy other Runesmiths' work, except during their apprenticeship.

[X] [THOREK] Both
 
Which means there were either Runesmiths that didn't abide to the rule of pride so strictly,
Or there were enough Runesmiths to create all the Generation 2 waystones without breaking the Rule of Pride.
Or that the level of Runecraft was so high, that Apprentices (who are allowed to repeat runes and duplicate work) could make Waystones
Option two wouldn't work actually. The Rule of Pride forbids copying the work of other Runesmiths too. Also, an option you haven't mentioned is that each Waystone is simply a unique piece of runecraft. Which would be insane, but still fulfill the Rule.
 
[X] [THOREK] Both
Enthusiasm is much better than acceptance, and the cost is payable.

[X] [ARM] Disassemble
Understanding the principles is better than pewpew lazers.
I find it a little strange on how metaphorical gold and real gold ended up so different in material qualities.
It makes more sense if you've read stuff from the Western (which actually originated in what we now call the Middle East, but nomenclature is a hard problem) esoteric/occult traditions. The Magnum Opus of alchemy was transhumanism before transhumanism was a thing, and every reference to metal is both literal and a complicated jumble of symbolism drawing from earlier sources.

...actually, now that I think about it, I'm not convinced it does make more sense if you've done the reading.
As much as I'm catching up on my reading of the Warhammer books, I'm still a Warhammer noob. So I didn't realise the significance of this line until just now, when I cracked open the 8th edition Dwarf Army book. In there, Thorgrim has a quote that says:

"That which is wrong with the world that we cannot fix with the blades of our axes, we shall surely avenge."

I didn't realise that Boney took a canon line from him and changed it to reflect his current mentality, but now that I do I like it so much more.
Thank you for sharing this, I had no idea because I don't read the Warhammer primary sources, and it is great to know the resonance of that line.
 
Voting is open
Back
Top