- Location
- California
[x] [THOREK] Karaz Ghumzul
As much as I'm catching up on my reading of the Warhammer books, I'm still a Warhammer noob. So I didn't realise the significance of this line until just now, when I cracked open the 8th edition Dwarf Army book. In there, Thorgrim has a quote that says:As more tones sound, the High King's smile grows. "That which is wrong with the world that we cannot fix with the blades of our axes, we shall surely rebuild."
Will that be on screen? I'd totally get it if not (it would fit the precedent I think), but seeing a LM Mathilde throw around her soft power in an Empire setting would be right up my alley.Middenheim thing just requires a few words with the right people to lend her influence.
The Waystones, constructed jointly by the Ancestor Gods and Elven Archmages, protect our land from the threat of demonkind and twisting influence of the realm they call home.
They definitely don't see it that way, because the Chaos Dwarfs exist. The fact they also abandoned everything else the Dwarfs like doesn't stop them being secessionists, although whether Ghumzul stings more because they're retained a lot of the Karaz Ankor's traditions or not I couldn't say.I'm not serious, but it's entirely possible that Thorek (Or any pious dwarf) sees it that way.
Karak Azul endured for three millennia separated from Karaz Ankor, beset by enemies, and it survived.
Karaz Ghumzul declared independence from Karaz Ankor, and broke. Who else knows what other traditions they broke when they declared independence?
I'm not sure he was saying they're the only secessionists?They definitely don't see it that way, because the Chaos Dwarfs exist. The fact they also abandoned everything else the Dwarfs like doesn't stop them being secessionists, although whether Ghumzul stings more because they're retained a lot of the Karaz Ankor's traditions or not I couldn't say.
They are only secessionists that broke apart from Grungni's Karaz Ankor.
I don't see it as a mutually exclusive.They definitely don't see it that way, because the Chaos Dwarfs exist. The fact they also abandoned everything else the Dwarfs like doesn't stop them being secessionists, although whether Ghumzul stings more because they're retained a lot of the Karaz Ankor's traditions or not I couldn't say.
For what it's worth, particularly if you ask the Chaos Dwarfs themselves, the argument would be that they were abandoned and left for dead, rather than defected.The Dwarfs of Zorn Uzkul defected, turned to worship the ruinous powers and plague us to this day.
How come? The Rule of Pride has no bearing on whether or not you're making up new runes altogether, just that you don't ever put anything short of your best efforts and finest materials you have on hand into your work. It only demands that you never use your runecraft to make anything besides masterworks.It potentially says so very interesting things about the Rune of Pride, but that's something that we don't know enough about to say anything definitive on.
Well, no, the Rule of Pride is to not make the same runic item multiple times.How come? The Rule of Pride has no bearing on whether or not you're making up new runes altogether, just that you don't ever put anything short of your best efforts and finest materials you have on hand into your work. It only demands that you never use your runecraft to make anything besides masterworks.
Which means there were either Runesmiths that didn't abide to the rule of pride so strictly,Well, no, the Rule of Pride is to not make the same runic item multiple times.
Sadly, that take on the Rule of Pride is from RHUNRIKKI STROLLAR, which is set during an era where Dwarves weren't anywhere near as self-destructively conservative, and Snorri has actively undermined the ideological predecessors of this era's runelords.How come? The Rule of Pride has no bearing on whether or not you're making up new runes altogether, just that you don't ever put anything short of your best efforts and finest materials you have on hand into your work. It only demands that you never use your runecraft to make anything besides masterworks.
No more than one item may carry the same combination of runes. This restriction also applies to the use of single runes. Creating runic items takes a great deal of effort, and Runesmiths don't like repeating themselves. Nor do they copy other Runesmiths' work, except during their apprenticeship.
Option two wouldn't work actually. The Rule of Pride forbids copying the work of other Runesmiths too. Also, an option you haven't mentioned is that each Waystone is simply a unique piece of runecraft. Which would be insane, but still fulfill the Rule.Which means there were either Runesmiths that didn't abide to the rule of pride so strictly,
Or there were enough Runesmiths to create all the Generation 2 waystones without breaking the Rule of Pride.
Or that the level of Runecraft was so high, that Apprentices (who are allowed to repeat runes and duplicate work) could make Waystones
It makes more sense if you've read stuff from the Western (which actually originated in what we now call the Middle East, but nomenclature is a hard problem) esoteric/occult traditions. The Magnum Opus of alchemy was transhumanism before transhumanism was a thing, and every reference to metal is both literal and a complicated jumble of symbolism drawing from earlier sources.I find it a little strange on how metaphorical gold and real gold ended up so different in material qualities.
Thank you for sharing this, I had no idea because I don't read the Warhammer primary sources, and it is great to know the resonance of that line.As much as I'm catching up on my reading of the Warhammer books, I'm still a Warhammer noob. So I didn't realise the significance of this line until just now, when I cracked open the 8th edition Dwarf Army book. In there, Thorgrim has a quote that says:
"That which is wrong with the world that we cannot fix with the blades of our axes, we shall surely avenge."
I didn't realise that Boney took a canon line from him and changed it to reflect his current mentality, but now that I do I like it so much more.
It doesn't, but it's still fascinating....actually, now that I think about it, I'm not convinced it does make more sense if you've done the reading.