This is still a Quest thread and not a general thread, but I feel obliged to respond to "If you don't at the same time point out or raise an objection to every instance of bigotry within a work of media, you lose the right to object to any single instance within it" and "If it was used in a Disney piece of media, it must be OK" (Seriously? Pointing to Disney of all things as an indicator of progressivism and acceptability?) as they really, really irk me. I promise to confine my rebuttal to this single post and to make no further posts on these topics.
Fuck off. This is a warhammer thread and I wasn't the one who suddenly accused the creators of the edgy metal fantasy game of being racist.
It's not bigotry. Its 90's edgy metal over emphasis on the
First of all, Hunchback of Notre Dame was released in 1996, fully twenty-six years ago by now. Yes, times certainly do "a changing" over 26 years.
Second, in 1971 the Romani Congress had voted to reject the use of "Gypsy" due to the negative connotations of the word (
Romani people - Wikipedia), so "Gypsy" was a slur at least as early as 1971 and remained so by 1996.
(Once again - Seriously? "If it's used in Disney it must be OK?")
The first half of your oh so indignant rant I just ignored because it added nothing to the discussion.
So let us address the pertinent points of info.
Yes. 1996. A full 11 years before 2007 which warhammer 2nd Edition was released and the Strigani were introduced.
2022-2007= 15 years. So its still closer to that time when people who don't live in europe proper could say "gypsy" and not automatically mean
"Thieves, Con artists, and other undesirables."
When it was at worst american/foreign insensitivity rather than an automatic attempt to put the good Romani people back into their place as the scum of society.
IT IS A PRODUCT OF THE TIME.
First off, I disagree with the notion that if you don't at the same time point out or raise an objection to every instance of bigotry within a work of media, you lose the right to object to any single instance within it.
Nevertheless, I will respond to the analogues you have brought up.
Norscans / Vikings / the Swedish-Danish - The Vikings as a culture / polity ended in 1066 with the defeat of King Harald of Norway, almost 1,000 years ago. Their modern-day descendants in the Scandinavian nations are not generally the subjects of bigotry and persecution (unlike e.g. the Roma).
And the Romani of today are not the same people being parodied in WHFB now are they?
These examples are all of course there to show you that you are complaining about a parodied version of a people just as each and every single one of these other examples are.
The Strigani are NOT the Romani.
The Norscans, the Cathayans, the Asur, the Dawi, the LIZARDMEN.
For all their use of similar fashion or stereotypical props are not the same people who are subject to racial prejudice and bigotry in our world.
Warhammer is just for fun. Stop looking for "OMGRACISM"cause you don't have to look deep to find it in everything.
Dawi / Jews - How are the Warhammer Fantasy Dawi an analogue to Jews?
... Answered by Shine.
At least the Strigani are recognizably Romani.
The jews became a race of short angry men with an obsession for gold,grudges, and the "good old days."
As well as a long list of depressive/suicidal/Obsessive habits/symptoms scaled towards its entire society and culture?
Hmm... Half-assed effort to mirror "Zionism"?
Asur / British colonialism - The British colonialists were the oppressors, not the oppressed. Imperialism and imperialists should be mocked and satirised.
Asur/Duchii basically represent the age of colonialism with all its backstabby politics and exploitative policies that screwed over people around the world. Places like my country. And for all the positive things they have done. They have a longer list of atrocities and out right thefts.
And you can mock and call out its flaws. But you cannot deny it's role in connecting the world into one big networked system. For all those that were killed or valuables that were taxed and outright stolen. The world we have now is because this happened and the spread of western civilization.
Just like the Asur/Druchii. Yes. They saved the world and basically owned a huge chunk of it. But it was also their fault why things went to shit
Orcs / Soccer Hooligans - Similarly, soccer hooligans are not a group of people that are "unfairly discriminated against and persecuted".
Yes. But like everyone else on this list they have been exaggerated and parodied into what is basically a caricature.
Empire / Holy Roman Empire - The Holy Roman Empire no longer exists, and (as far as I am aware) there are currently no groups of people who are being persecuted for being descendants of subjects of the Holy Roman Empire.
They are also basically Nazi Germany with all its wacky tanks, xenophobia, human centrism and low level racism...
yes even to dwarves.
It's a mishmash not a 1 to 1 equivalence. They are also like Saudi Arabia.
Sigmar / Literally hammer Jesus - What is your critique / objection for this one?
Because if you really want to bring a group of angry people (if I really wanted to) find significant and concerning aesthetic similarities with my lord and savior.
Including the fact that they have/had organizations killing people in their name.
But guess what? I don't because he isn't Jesus and
Witch hunters / Spanish Inquisition - Witch Hunters are generally portrayed within the Warhammer Fantasy literature as being crazed fanatics and going to unjust extremes and hurting innocent people, which is a fair analogue-portrayal of the Inquisition.
They also have good reason to be crazy paranoid in universe. Why is this important? Its because unlike
And like the rest of the examples here the depiction in WHFB is a parody.