I suspect whatever butcher's bill we might hit for this quarter hasn't happened yet.


They were obviously 90% of the way there when she left, and they never would have gotten there if not for her managing to keep her crew alive so that it could shake into tip-top condition over the years. Courageous and Sarek started with the same crew ratings as Enterprise, remember- but Sarek took heavy losses during the Biophage crisis, and Courageous suffered the same in the mine strike.

So I'd argue that this is a testament to Nash's ability to cultivate a crew- that she pushed them hard enough and taught them well enough that they can do their jobs under another (highly competent in her own right) captain. Nobody else has pulled that off yet; for all we know this may be the first Elite starship we've had since the 2260s. Honestly, given how many redshirts were lost during Kirk's five-year mission, it's entirely possible that the Elite status of the Enterprise may have been whittled down to Veteran by 2270; the credit for making that Elite crew might properly belong to Christopher Pike.

I would chalk it up to luck. That's not to discount luck, though.


Spamming old designs really only makes sense in the context of imminent war, where we need the ships NOW and can't wait five years for a new design project and prototype cycle to bear fruit.

I honestly support the idea of us starting a new escort design in the near future, if we can come up with a satisfactory one. The big problem is deciding what constitutes "satisfactory." We might need some kind of official 'build doctrine' vote in the main thread. One where everyone lines up and says "okay, which of these types of escorts are we trying to build," so that the SDB crew has some guidance in figuring out what they're trying to optimize the ship for.

A design project that uses all older parts shouldn't end up a full five years. We're talking 3y prototyping, and actually, I don't know if we'd even have a year of research. In theory, the new design research paradigm is supposed to be for parts we don't have yet, the advantage of reusing existing is supposed to be no new research. That's something else we'd need to understand (and have added to the sheet so our proposals can include their research times) before we go for any design project though.

I would generally agree that there should be a set of guidelines or requirements for any custom ship design vote. Just asking us to produce an escort would result in a massive variety of ships.
 
A design project that uses all older parts shouldn't end up a full five years. We're talking 3y prototyping, and actually, I don't know if we'd even have a year of research. In theory, the new design research paradigm is supposed to be for parts we don't have yet, the advantage of reusing existing is supposed to be no new research. That's something else we'd need to understand (and have added to the sheet so our proposals can include their research times) before we go for any design project though.
Hm.

Personally, I'd prefer it if there was still at least a short period of research to do the detail design on the ship before constructing the prototype. Even if all the components we want to fit into the hull are well understood, making them all fit together properly would still take time and effort, realistically. And you can't even begin the prototyping until you're finished drawing up the detailed blueprints.

Unless we assume that "blueprinting" ships is free and we're only paying political will to get permission to build the prototype...

I would generally agree that there should be a set of guidelines or requirements for any custom ship design vote. Just asking us to produce an escort would result in a massive variety of ships.
Yeah. At least with "build the Ambassador," everyone has a pretty good idea of what an Ambassador is supposed to look like- it's supposed to be a three-megaton explorer that's about as good as we can make it in all categories, and needing to be well-rounded like the Excelsiors are.

I would chalk it up to luck. That's not to discount luck, though.
Luck may play a role, but probabilities influence luck, and Nash's presence aboard the Enterprise meant that Enterprise had significantly higher probabilities of having good things happen, and lower probabilities of bad things happening. The ship underwent about 35 to 40 events and participated in multiple battles under her tenure, after all. We can't know exactly how many times her "+1 to all stats" bonus made the difference between success and failure, but it's likely to have been 'several.'

And of course there's the narrative side of the quest, which is something entirely different and which I for one am inclined to respect. On that side of things, Nash's positive influence on the Enterprise is indisputable.

she was running at effectively elite level when nash was running her, the crew just took a little while to figure out how to operate at the level nash drew out of them on their own, kind of poignant really.
Samhaya Mrr'shan being really good probably helps with that.

Actually, with Enterprise at Elite, the ship now performs better than it did under Nash's tenure- because Samhaya's Combat and Presence bonuses stack with the +1 from an elite crew. But that's the result of the very talented Captain Sam building on the work of the very talented Captain Nash, who was in turn building on the work of Captain John who turned the Enterprise-B into a Veteran ship in only six or seven years.

If we see far, it is because we stand on the shoulders of giants, et cetera.
 
The former I would assume, but I honestly would be suprized if the Beast attacked us from the neutral zone again. If I were a betting man, I would expect that the beast ships would have gone coreward after their loss of their base of operations. After exiting the uncovered portion of the neutral zone, they likely directed themselves to locating the Naggarok, consuming any lifeforms they come across in their path.

Pretty sure the Romulans destroyed the Naggorok centuries ago.
 
Here's a hypothetical intermediate generation fleet:
Explorers/Pride of the Fleet: Ambassador
Heavy Cruiser/Fleet Flagship: Excelsior-A
Medium Cruiser: TBD 1.5/1.8 mt ship
Light Cruiser: Rennaisance
Patrol Escort: MESS
Garrison Escort: TBD Scale 2 Miranda replacement
Science Escort: Kepler or MESS science variant, or both
 
Good point.

Also, the Qloathi have at least one explorer-class ship. Good to know.

Explorer class is more of a role than a statement of capability. I don't remember what tech level the Qloathi are at, so their explorer could be anything from an Excelsior level to a Ranger. It's probably closer to the former than the latter, but you never know.
 
Explorer class is more of a role than a statement of capability. I don't remember what tech level the Qloathi are at, so their explorer could be anything from an Excelsior level to a Ranger. It's probably closer to the former than the latter, but you never know.

Boldly Go Other Species lists their tech level as "2300's" which could easily be above Federation level.
 
Did they destroy the Naggorok, or did they only get it's beacon?
Well...
"Over a thousand years ago, we encountered what we came to know as the Inflictor, busily consuming a colony world of ours," explains the Praetor. "We destroyed the colony world, and tracked it back to a derelict, extra-galactic ship that had been drifting through our space. We took a sample of this creature, and after realising it was intelligent, we attempted to harness it." He sighs and reclines back in his chair. "It failed, with great loss. Nothing can alter the mental template of the Inflictor, it is ruthlessly self-correcting. The Inflictor, is the Inflictor, is the Inflictor. So we buried the project in bases on inhospitable worlds and the project was lost to time."
From the sounds of it? They didn't destroy it, of course they may have said so in a later post but I didn't find anything.
 
So after that round of logs we still have: the SBZ, the RBZ, Ferasa, Amarkia, the Courageous, the Sarek, and the Miracht. All of the remaining sector events are places with an Excelsior assigned, which will hopefully mean a good chance of success.
 
Here's a hypothetical intermediate generation fleet:
Explorers/Pride of the Fleet: Ambassador
Heavy Cruiser/Fleet Flagship: Excelsior-A
Medium Cruiser: TBD 1.5/1.8 mt ship
Light Cruiser: Rennaisance
Patrol Escort: MESS
Garrison Escort: TBD Scale 2 Miranda replacement
Science Escort: Kepler or MESS science variant, or both
The medium cruiser is probably redundant given that we'll have a large force of Excelsior-As. We have eleven Excelsiors right now; five more will be done by the end of 2314, and another twelve or so can be completed between then and 2321.*

Even if we lose a few explorers in the next decade, we're looking at a force of something in the neighborhood of 25 Excelsiors, and that's assuming we don't build any more heavy berths and turn out any more ships in those. This leaves us with more than enough explorers to have an Excelsior flagship in every sector of our space. Including all the sectors that we have now, and any that we are likely to acquire in the next ten years (say, a Risa sector). And Excelsiors do a great job responding to events when they're available. The Excelsior-A refit will probably make them even better, although it's unclear which stats the refit will improve.

Given that during the mid- to late 2320s, we'll be transitioning the Ambassadors into the Explorer Corps role and pushing the Excelsiors back into the regular fleet, there simply won't be much point in building 1.5 or 1.8 megaton cruisers that are unlikely to be much more capable than the huge number of 'legacy' Excelsior-As. Especially since we don't have a big pile of two-megaton berths around; any berth we could use to build these hypothetical medium cruisers is a berth we could also be using to build Ambassadors or refit Excelsiors. That's not good, given that it'd probably take five heavy berths a total of about ten years just to finish that job, at two years refit time per ship.

I'm also not sure there's going to be much demand for "patrol" and "garrison" escorts that are sharply different. Could you elaborate on what differences we're likely to need, that make it worthwhile to build two different classes of escort rather than a single compromise design?
____________________

*2321 is the last year that Briefvoice's spreadsheet lists Excelsior completions; by that time we'll be able to start Ambassadors in our three-megaton berths and will be building those instead.

The "25 Excelsiors" rough estimate may prove to be an overestimate, especially if we decide to slow production of new explorers in order to refit the old ones. Given that we have to sacrifice the opportunity to build one new ship in four years in order to refit two old ones in two years each, that could leave us building more like ten new explorers, winding up with about twenty- but many of those twenty ships will be refitted by the early 2320s.

If we keep building at maximum rate we get more ships- but refits to them will compete with Ambassador production, except for the 2.5-megaton berths at Andor and Tellar Prime, which can't handle an Ambassador without modification and CAN handle Excelsior refits.
 
Last edited:
Maybe. But for the moment, that seems kind of pointless if the best we can do is, say, a 4-2-2-4-1-2 escort that costs as much as a Centaur-A.

If that's the best we can do in terms of a reasonably optimized fighting escort, then we should probably just stick with the "in case of emergency spam Miranda-As" idea, and revisit the "new fighting escort design" a decade from now.

true, but it is setting up the precedent and since this is the Commanding Admiral's last year, we could set it up as a tradition, alternatively, we can push for the development of the prototype to be greenlighted only to give it up in the political tit for tat.
 
As long as we're fighting the Syndicate, political will is going to be at a premium. I would rather we not spend it on any projects we don't seriously expect to get significant benefit from. That certainly includes not setting up any new ship projects we're not planning to put into mass production.

And I certainly don't want Starfleet's admiral of 2320 being told "hey, you already HAVE a 2310-vintage fighting escort design, why do you need a new one?" and being stuck with a design that is hardly better than the Miranda-A, with a significantly higher price tag. Especially in officers; we're likely to be short of officers for the next several years.

I'd rather make do with the Miranda-A for a while longer so that when we do get a gunship, it's actually a good one. Instead of buying a relatively bad gunship now and being stuck with it for twenty years.
 
@AKuz, would you mind expanding on that? I'm not sure how to interpret that.

Sorry, The Constellations are likely a result of the sort of thinking that you were talking about. The Constellations were likely built as too little too soon and we are left with underwhelming failboats that I would like to replace as soon as possible.
 
Ah.

[waves at the four-stacker]

Is this a critique of my position, or of a brand-new fighting escort design that is, as you say, "too little too soon?"

My view is that the Miranda-A isn't a powerful fighting escort, but is at least cheap, considerably more cost-effective in combat than any other ship we have. If we actually needed a bunch of fighting escorts in a hurry, building more Miranda-As wouldn't be as painful as a lot of the other things we could build to bulk up our combat potential. Furthermore, just by refitting the Mirandas we already have, we get a sizeable fighting escort force, almost for free.

But to start a totally new fighting escort design that is drastically more expensive and only a little more capable than the Miranda-A, this soon after the refit escorts became available, would be folly. We wouldn't benefit from the new ships at all, unless we chose to spend a lot of resources building up a strong force of them. And those ships would then be unsatisfactory 'dogs' of our fleet in the 2330s and on, because of their extremely weak event response and unimpressive firepower. We would spend much and gain little.

Which, I gather, is what you were getting at, @AKuz, I just wasn't sure because my sarcasm-o-meter has been on the fritz all day.

...

[To be fair to the Constellations they're built to the same scale as our escorts, so it's no surprise they're not more effective than those escorts.]
 
Akuz's post indicates a Constellation-class Vessel is currently greeting you.

Constellation class says: "Hello, Yes. I am an adorable and cute Constellation class with a chipper attitude towards life. My Best friend is the USS Sappho; she is good at volley-phasertag. I like to explore and run fast. Fighting makes me sad and I hope Enterprise-senpai notices me someday!"

=======
''''''''''\\''''''
~~~====[[[[[[( : D )]]]]]]
,,,,,,,,,//,,,,,
=======
 
I've got a paragraph or two of love letter to the poor neglected Constellations tucked away for an Eddie Leslie omake scheduled for 2314 when Renaissance comes out. :)
 
Constellation class says: "Hello, Yes. I am an adorable and cute Constellation class with a chipper attitude towards life. My Best friend is the USS Sappho; she is good at volley-phasertag. I like to explore and run fast. Fighting makes me sad and I hope Enterprise-senpai notices me someday!"

=======
''''''''''\\''''''
~~~====[[[[[[( : D )]]]]]]
,,,,,,,,,//,,,,,
=======
I honestly got a bit of a sadface when I saw that the current plans are to name the next Excelsior Stargazer. Since in my mind that's the Constellation that Picard commands....it'd be what, another 20 years from now? At least?
*Checks Memory Alpha for quick-and-dirty dating*
Huh, 2333 when he served on the bridge, call it 2330 when he started on her?
So yeah about 20 years?
 
Back
Top