@Ato:
The backstory did in fact make it better, for me at least.
My inner Eddie Leslie was grumbling by half way through that log:
"You know, Mendoza really should have had a pair of Vulcans grab that artifact. While being covered by about six guys with phasers on heavy stun in case Vulcans turn out to be
extra susceptible to this particular brand of psychic bullshit, instead of
extra resistant like usual, because once in a while the gods of space just love to screw with you like that. Then the whole posse should have taken the thing to the nearest torpedo tube, and fired it straight into the nearest sun."
Would that have solved the problem?
[regarding the slogan "Make Space Safe Again!"]
I don't think its been that since the Preservers. Maybe not even then.
We could go with "Take Back the Space!" instead...
This could easily lead to the best possible outcome. If both the Federation and the Cardassians have noteworthy influence, then Bajor is effectively denied to both parties, nullifying the threat she presents in the hands of a major power.
If the situation were that symmetrical I'd agree.
The problem is, Bajor presents very little threat to
us in Cardassian hands- the Seyek and the Indorions won't be happy that the Cardassians can base out of there, but the Federation at large is hardly affected. The great majority of our current and prospective member species live a lot farther from Bajor than the majority of Cardassians do.
Conversely, Bajor presents a more significant threat to Cardassia in
our hands. Both because it deprives them of mineral resources (canonically their main reason for desiring the planet), and because of the position issue I just mentioned.
However, a symmetrical situation where Bajor remains permanently neutral is totally fine by me. The problem is that the Cardassians are very likely to force the issue with, well... force.