With so many viable designs for a diplomacy-focused ship, maybe we shouldn't pick just one. We can prototype multiple different refit designs, while still starting a new ship project for a longer-term improvement. Even just going for two ships might be useful, with one more immediate refit and one long-term new ship. We can get the best of both worlds (or more) by constructing both worlds at the same time. (Just like baking two cakes, only we don't eat our starships, so...)
I regard 'spacer' as being equivalent to 'sailor.' If we would call naval ratings 'sailors' in real life where all our ships are sea ships, it would be reasonable to call naval ratings 'spacers' in a fictional setting where all our ships are space ships.A spacer is someone who works or lives in space though.
Crewman is part of a ships crew.
Rather different meanings.
Would require a bit more 'space is an ocean' than I'm comfortable with, and may weird out people from planets with little or no seafaring nautical tradition. Vulcans who live on a desert planet, Tellarites who don't have a 'world ocean' and instead have small landlocked seas; Orions whose seafaring tradition is millenia dead with a corpse on a planet that is itself a millenium dead; Yrillians who have an extremely active spacefaring tradition to draw on and whose seafaring tradition is likewise about as forgotten as the Orions', and so on.
I think he means getting multiple designs, as they spawn refits of the centaur to new 1500t cruisers.What does actually building a one-off getus over the theoretical design get us before we start deployment?
Point.I regard 'spacer' as being equivalent to 'sailor.' If we would call naval ratings 'sailors' in real life where all our ships are sea ships, it would be reasonable to call naval ratings 'spacers' in a fictional setting where all our ships are space ships.
Also, neither 'crewman' NOR 'spacer' is a perfect tool for differentiating between individuals in Starfleet service and individuals not in Starfleet service but who, like Starfleet, happen to work in space. That is not the point of the rank title. The point is to have a noun that accurately describes our low-ranking crew members, and it is as accurate to call them 'spacers' as it would be to call Navy personnel on Earth 'sailors.'
So, something like this?
The initially rather unsatisfying-sounding "Crewer", perhaps."Crewperson" only sounds awkward because it has too many syllables. English could really use a one-syllable gender-neutral alternative to man/men, but I'm no linguist.
And does the related position of Crew Brewer replicate the beer, or replicate the hops and brew the beer? Do they brew for the crew, or somehow brew the crew?
Classified level 1-AAAAnd does the related position of Crew Brewer replicate the beer, or replicate the hops and brew the beer? Do they brew for the crew, or somehow brew the crew?
One of the main advantages of the centaur-P is that it only cost 30SR to refit a centaur-A to it, so if we choose that as one of our P ships it would be better that we refit no of the remaining centuar-A's to centaur-B in the upcoming shipyard vote.Not so much can wait as MUST wait as we can't build any design without going through the Snakepit.
"The Crew Brewer" totally is the Risan Lifeguard equivalent of our Personnel Command.
Unclassified. This is the correct answer.
I think I got it, we could use spacehand, but it has the issue of, well, non hand species feeling left out.
So, we should call our crew: Drones.
Now, if only we could design some enlistment nanites...
Yes, but by the same token it's generic in a setting where all sorts of things have "crews."Point.
When you call someone crewman though, has little to do with space or ships, but with being one of a moving vehicles operators. Like tanks, airplanes, submarines, or ships.
When you combine 'sailor' with 'celestial bodies' it certainly comes to mind easily.
Honestly my choice of 'spacer' isn't really a PC thing, I honestly like it better, but I see what you mean.I think we're getting into the territory of PC for PC's sake with all these terms. Canonically, all of the Trek series used "crewman" as the general term for people working on the ship/station. It's understood that this term is also used to refer to female (and presumably other gendered) personnel.
"Crewperson" only sounds awkward because it has too many syllables. English could really use a one-syllable gender-neutral alternative to man/men, but I'm no linguist.