- Location
- somewhere
You make it sound like there is a contradiction? We are both saying the same thing: Not in 2308, but in 2309 or later.Fair enough, glad to know that was the expectation...
...unless this is the case, that is.
You make it sound like there is a contradiction? We are both saying the same thing: Not in 2308, but in 2309 or later.Fair enough, glad to know that was the expectation...
...unless this is the case, that is.
You make it sound like there is a contradiction? We are both saying the same thing: Not in 2308, but in 2309 or later.
Where is the actual paper to go along with the title? Also, calling foreign powers Belligerent is something that makes the document sound like propaganda, I would recommend said word being changed to "established" to show that said powers are preceding the formation of the Federation. Also Alien wouldn't be a good word either for the amount of different races that make up the federation. I would think switching to Interstellar would be a good idea so that it is more inclusive.
Honestly, the whole thing regarding the Constellation refit just seems like a big Sunk Cost Fallacy to me. "We have them, so we need to make them useful somehow."
Rather than trying to make a rather crappy design somewhat less crappy, we'd be better off making sure we can churn out better and/or more modern designs in larger quantities. Essentially, start the Renaissance project, bridge the time until then with Connie-Bs, and invest the PP in things like additional berths, bigger budget, or larger academy.
Investing those 45 PP into the Constellation just seems like a complete and utter waste to me.
I think we can afford to take ANY ship out for a year if we need to, especially a relatively small one like a Centaur.I am in favor of refitting one or both centaurs if we have the berth space and if we can afford to take them out for a year.
My money's on introducing something like this some time in the 2310s, after the Rennies are in the prototyping phase. We'll be in the middle of a major military buildup, and this might do a bit to convince the Council we're not going crazy-warlike on them.When should we introduce a new science ship?
There's 900 kt designs floating around now in the SDB that are decent escorts/garrison ships and great science ships...
Also, the tentative name for the class is Kepler.
When should we introduce a new science ship?
There's 900 kt designs floating around now in the SDB that are decent escorts/garrison ships and great science ships.
My take on the Kepler:
C2 S7 H2 L3 P2 D3
90BR 55SR
99.3ish reliability
8 Techs (≤L2).
My money's on introducing something like this some time in the 2310s, after the Rennies are in the prototyping phase. We'll be in the middle of a major military buildup, and this might do a bit to convince the Council we're not going crazy-warlike on them.
Alternatively we can suggest it at the same time we suggest a weapons design tech team, but that might be too blatant.
The only way a Constellation refit would help out is by increasing the Combat value by 1, at the cost of a year of berth time. Using that berth to instead build a new Centaur-A effectively gets us 1.5 Combat instead. Not to mention all the other benefits of an additional vessel.The rennie is getting started next turn regardless but it's not going to be ready to help with a war with the Cardassians, the Constellation refit on the other hand will.
Let's pretend we didn't have any Constellations, and this was a new ship design on offer, with identical mechanical effects. Getting a new 4 3 2 2 2 4 ship for 55 br 30 sr (refit cost + scap value) with just 1 year of build time is a pretty good deal, even if it's limited to 8 ships total. A ship about as good as the Centaur-A, for about half the resource cost, and with a number limit about as high as the number of Centaur A's we were going to ever build? Why wouldn't we want to get that?Honestly, the whole thing regarding the Constellation refit just seems like a big Sunk Cost Fallacy to me. "We have them, so we need to make them useful somehow."
Rather than trying to make a rather crappy design somewhat less crappy, we'd be better off making sure we can churn out better and/or more modern designs in larger quantities. Essentially, start the Renaissance project, bridge the time until then with Connie-Bs, and invest the PP in things like additional berths, bigger budget, or larger academy.
Investing those 45 PP into the Constellation just seems like a complete and utter waste to me.
Constellation though increases it's defense score by 1 letting it work as a garrison ship. Also based on how responses work it has +7 to science events and +6 to presence events. It also takes no additional crew and fewer resources. Now if we can afford to build a new ship in that berth then I would be for doing so but whenever we have a berth free we can do a refit.The only way a Constellation refit would help out is by increasing the Combat value by 1, at the cost of a year of berth time. Using that berth to instead build a new Centaur-A effectively gets us 1.5 Combat instead. Not to mention all the other benefits of an additional vessel.
Even a Miranda refit would be better, since that increases the durability of the escort vessel in question by 2/3rds, effectively giving us more vessels we can throw into battle without having to worry about them getting blown up almost immediately.
There simply isn't any point where refitting the Constellations isn't a complete and total waste of both PP and berth space.
Too early to consider creating it.The Cheyenne is a pretty cool looking ship, and thematically seems to follow on from the Constellation. Has anyone tried stating that up?
The only way a Constellation refit would help out is by increasing the Combat value by 1, at the cost of a year of berth time. Using that berth to instead build a new Centaur-A effectively gets us 1.5 Combat instead. Not to mention all the other benefits of an additional vessel.
Even a Miranda refit would be better, since that increases the durability of the escort vessel in question by 2/3rds, effectively giving us more vessels we can throw into battle without having to worry about them getting blown up almost immediately.
There simply isn't any point where refitting the Constellations isn't a complete and total waste of both PP and berth space.
@Briefvoice,
Do we have a good list anywhere of which berths will be available when? How many berths, total, open up before we can start producing Constitution-Bs?
Too early to consider creating it.
According to the wiki, it's a late 24th century ship.
Question, is the one year berth time per ship or is that for the entire class to be upgraded?The only way a Constellation refit would help out is by increasing the Combat value by 1, at the cost of a year of berth time. Using that berth to instead build a new Centaur-A effectively gets us 1.5 Combat instead. Not to mention all the other benefits of an additional vessel.
Even a Miranda refit would be better, since that increases the durability of the escort vessel in question by 2/3rds, effectively giving us more vessels we can throw into battle without having to worry about them getting blown up almost immediately.
There simply isn't any point where refitting the Constellations isn't a complete and total waste of both PP and berth space.
Question, is the one year berth time per ship or is that for the entire class to be upgraded?
Per ship, same with the costQuestion, is the one year berth time per ship or is that for the entire class to be upgraded?
I believe the opening post of the thread is periodically updated with ongoing ship construction, including expected date of completion. There is also a listing of total existing yardspace available to Starfleet. If I've read it correctly, we currently have four Excelsiors in construction out of five berths, as well as the four updated Centaurs laid down just this quarter. These four escorts will take two years to complete. When Utopia Planitia is ready, that will add two large berths and two small berths for new construction.Do we have a good list anywhere of which berths will be available when? How many berths, total, open up before we can start producing Constitution-Bs?
IMO, we need some cruiser berths. 2.5 mt berths will be able to handle scale 8 cruisers, which is where I want to be eventually, though 1.5 mt berths will probably be cheaper.I believe the opening post of the thread is periodically updated with ongoing ship construction, including expected date of completion. There is also a listing of total existing yardspace available to Starfleet. If I've read it correctly, we currently have four Excelsiors in construction out of five berths, as well as the four updated Centaurs laid down just this quarter. These four escorts will take two years to complete. When Utopia Planitia is ready, that will add two large berths and two small berths for new construction.
In total, we will shortly have seven (7) berths rated at 2.5+ megatons, as well as six (6) berths rated at 1 megaton construction. This does not account for additional slipways requested in future sessions with the Federation Council, requests I would highly recommend if we want to ramp up construction in the next decade of play.
We have the option for 2mt cruiser berths, costing 20pp (compared to currently 10pp for 1mt berths at Ana Font or Lor'Vela and 40pp for 3mt berths).IMO, we need some cruiser berths. 2.5 mt berths will be able to handle scale 8 cruisers, which is where I want to be eventually, though 1.5 mt berths will probably be cheaper.
Also, calling foreign powers Belligerent is something that makes the document sound like propaganda, I would recommend said word being changed to "established" to show that said powers are preceding the formation of the Federation. Also Alien wouldn't be a good word either for the amount of different races that make up the federation. I would think switching to Interstellar would be a good idea so that it is more inclusive.