Winged One
Not the Simurgh
- Location
- definitely the ground
- Pronouns
- They/Them/It
Bullshit.
Bullshit.
Thoughts: First, I'm leery of the support cruiser role, the Constellation has always been an odd one out that we've occasionally used because we already have the design anyway. With us now having a capable science escort once again, the design space for a support cruiser shrinks even more. I think a combat heavy cruiser design to anchor the fleet and provide another option for members who have trouble fielding explorers is a more useful design space.
I really hope we do get to keep 45 Gabriel. It will be a nice spot to bottle up the Cardassian and Pact forces when they try to retake it when and if Hostilities ever break out. We will need to massively increase the defenses at 45 Gabriel though. A full sized Starbase, Minefields, Weapons Platforms, A full time garrison task force of at least 22C to defend it. if we do that the Cardassian and Pact forces would have to dedicate signifincant forces to taking the system and we can bleed their forces dry.I would like to know if there are any nasty surprises in sectors g3, f3 and e3 before green lighting colonies. Also be nice to know if we are going to be able to keep 45 Gabriel.
Enterprise:Iron Wolf said:I infiltrated the ship and used my tricorder to make it appear to the Hexolar that new systems had some online in the ship. I then revealed myself to the Hexolar and claimed I was the ship's consciousness, manifested through advanced technology. Many of the Hexolar were visibly disgusted with my inferior, four-limbed appearance. The Chief Scientist stated his disbelief that a species so poorly laid out could have built a ship so advanced...
The Chief Scientist then produced a primitive, black-powder based slugthrower and shot me.
You know, Awa must now be one of the two or three seniormost officers aboard Yukikaze, and we still don't know what he does!I beamed Commander Awa down with a security team. They found the Hishmeri had gorged themselves so much on the fish they could barely move, let alone fight. We apprehended them, confiscated their ship, and made contact with the nearest Hishmeri fleet. They were embarrassed by the whole incident, and said we could do with the prisoners as we pleased. So they will be in my brig until I can hand them off for trial.
There are a lot of conceivable situations where having Mirandas do skirmishing is better than having literally no skirmishers, especially if Oneiros keeps tinkering with the combat engine (very likely IMO), and especially if he does so in such a way as to avoid this perverse incentive that currently exists to keep Mirandas out of it.Its one of those thing which we have to be concerned about legacy designs with. At the moment its filled by the Miramda-A which is a poor skirmisher so we either keep the Miranda's out of battle or refit them with a significantly higher D value if thats possible.
If it turns the remaining Mirandas into ships that can participate in fleet battles without having our SDB types scream in terror about how bad they are at skirmishing, I don't care how expensive it is.Higher D almost certainly means a new warp core, which would be expensive.
We'll always have 'marginal' cruiser classes whose stats make it undesirable to keep them in battle. Right now that's the Constellations, in ten years it'll be the Constitution-Bs. And thirty or forty years from now as we enter the TNG era it'll include the Renaissances, which even with refits won't be able to keep up with the heavy cruiser/light explorer ships we'll be designing between then and now. Heck, at some future date if we're forced to reclassify the Excelsiors as cruisers (essentially what happened to the Connies), they'll be in that category too- eventually.Thoughts: First, I'm leery of the support cruiser role, the Constellation has always been an odd one out that we've occasionally used because we already have the design anyway. With us now having a capable science escort once again, the design space for a support cruiser shrinks even more.
You know those aren't mutually exclusive, right? Eh, you do, I'm being silly.I think a combat heavy cruiser design to anchor the fleet and provide another option for members who have trouble fielding explorers is a more useful design space.
Halkh:I really hope we do get to keep 45 Gabriel. It will be a nice spot to bottle up the Cardassian and Pact forces when they try to retake it when and if Hostilities ever break out. We will need to massively increase the defenses at 45 Gabriel though. A full sized Starbase, Minefields, Weapons Platforms, A full time garrison task force of at least 22C to defend it. if we do that the Cardassian and Pact forces would have to dedicate signifincant forces to taking the system and we can bleed their forces dry.
Halkh:
Leslie:Is there any particular pitfall to having a more combat focused cruiser/explorer with presence as a dump stat? It'd still have good S due to the militarization rules, but we can drop P down to 1 without too many problems.
Sergey has been serving aboard the Endurance since 2311; he appeared in my omake sequences Matryoshka and Devas and Asuras.Sergey Rozhenko? That's Worf's foster father! Hopefully, he won't need to do so this time around...
"Ask Councillor Rogers how he got drummed out of the admiral's chair some time. He was thinking the same thing. What could possibly go wrong, he thought."
Actually not necessarily. For one, the warp core doesn't actually contribute to D directly, and for another ... Miranda nacelles are old and a power-hog; if you can refit them with newer, less power-hungry nacelles, you'd get a faster design and have some free power to spare. It'd be a moderately expensive refit, but it'd make them something you could not feel utterly terrible about skirmishing with.Higher D almost certainly means a new warp core, which would be expensive.
It is the stench of SCIENCE!I can't help it, every time those lines above the Gaeni look like stink lines to me. Like he's implied to have been rolling in manure or something!
The question is, are they retired or "retired". Nash the Spy's companion still had valid system override codes, after all. And I'm almost certain said companion was Penelya Miran, which means she never had them legitimately.
I would ABSOLUTELY expect that a head of SFI who was removed as a sacrifice to politics would be allowed to be unofficially still in the service on a lower level if they wanted. Smart money says that Nash and Penelya are running an unofficial counterintel branch on Risa. The Risan's chillness is a liability here, and Linderly has access to two unofficial agents of proven skill and loyalty.
[X][ROLES] Base Plan fill Roles with ship Profiles
[X] A "Role" is a mission type that Starfleet believes its ships must undertake. A Role should be filled by a ship Profile; unfilled Roles are indications of a lack of current or future capability. A Profile to fill a new Role must be defined and any new ship in that Profile commenced within ten years.
[X] Define the following Roles which Starfleet believes are its responsibility:
-[X] Five-Year Mission - Execute five-year exploratory missions at long range with no support. Seek out severe anomalies, conduct high-level diplomacy, and discover and combat future threats.
-[X] Emergency Response (mandatory) - Distress calls of all sorts.
-[X] Primary Frontier Response - Flagships that patrol and respond to important events in border zones where the nature of each event is inherently uncertain.
-[X] Primary Sector Response - Sector flagships that patrol and respond to important events in established sectors.
-[X] Garrison Response (Science, Diplomatic, Combat) - Non-emergency exploration, diplomacy, patrol, and event response, broken further into expected duties.
-[X] Support Response - Support another responder.
-[X] Survey - Regular mapping missions.
-[X] Interception - Detect, intercept, and confront or tail potential unknowns, whether in peacetime or as part of a fleet.
-[X] Fleet Scout - Execute the scouting phase in battle.
-[X] Skirmish Line (and Minesweeping) - Achieve favorable positioning in the skirmish phase in battle. Skirmishers also detect mines for the fleet.
-[X] Vanguard Escort - Fill out numbers in the Vanguard and Heavy Metal phases in battle, and deal and take damage in those phases. Enable frigate-specific maneuvers in those phases.
-[X] Vanguard Line - Deal and take damage in the Vanguard and Heavy Metal phases in battle.
-[X] Battle Artillery - Deal the most damage in the Heavy Metal phase in battle, while soaking hits with shields and avoiding hull damage that reduces capability.
[X] A "Profile" is an outline of one or more ships that fulfills multiple Roles. Listing a new ship design in a Profile indicates intent to order that ship design with ten years.
[X] The components of a Profile are the primary Roles that the listed ships have priority to fill, the secondary Roles that the listed ships can fill, the design requirements of the ships, and a list of ships.
[X] Define the following Profiles:
-[X] Heavy Explorer
--[X] Primary Roles: Five-Year Mission, Emergency Response, Primary Frontier Response, Heavy Artillery
--[X] Secondary Roles: Primary Sector Response, Garrison Response (all), Survey, Interception
--[X] Requirements: No Size Limit, Explorer Frame, Medium+ Operations Subframe, C7+ S7+ P7+
--[X] Currently Filled By: Ambassador, Explorer Corps Excelsior-A
-[X] Light Explorer
--[X] Primary Roles: Primary Sector Response, Emergency Response, Heavy Artillery
--[X] Secondary Roles: Five-Year Mission, Primary Frontier Response, Garrison Response (all), Survey, Interception
--[X] Requirements: Maximum 2.6mt, Explorer Frame, Medium+ Operations Subframe, C6+ S6+ P6+ D6+
--[X] Currently Filled By: Excelsior-A
-[X] General Cruiser
--[X] Primary Roles: Garrison Response (all), Emergency Response, Interception, Vanguard Line
--[X] Secondary Roles: Primary Sector Response, Support Response, Survey
--[X] Requirements: 1mt to 1.5mt, Cruiser Frame, H+L of 8+, Average Stat of 4+, D5+
--[X] Currently Filled By: Renaissance
-[X] Support Cruiser
--[X] Primary Roles: Garrison Response (all), Support Response, Emergency Response, Interception, Survey
--[X] Secondary Roles: Vanguard Line
--[X] Requirements: Maximum 1mt, Cruiser Frame, Average Stat of 3+, D4+
--[X] Currently Filled By: Constellation-A, Constitution-B
-[X] Generalist Frigate
--[X] Primary Roles: Garrison Response (all), Support Response, Emergency Response, Skirmish Line, Interception, Survey
--[X] Secondary Roles: Vanguard Escort, Fleet Scout
--[X] Requirements: Frigate Frame, Minimum 2+ All Stats, S4+ P4+ D5+, 80 SR or less
--[X] Currently Filled By: Centaur-B Project, New Generalist Frigate Project
-[X] Science and Courier Frigate
--[X] Primary Roles: General Response (Science, Diplomatic), Support Response, Emergency Response, Survey, Fleet Scout
--[X] Secondary Roles: Skirmish Line, Interception
--[X] Requirements: Frigate Frame, Small Tactical Subframe, Medium+ Operations Subframe, Science Lab, LR+Nav Sensors, Max C2, S7+ P3+ D3+, 100 SR or less
--[X] Currently Filled By: Kepler Project
-[X] Combat Frigate
--[X] Primary Roles: Support Response, Emergency Response, Vanguard Escort
--[X] Secondary Roles: Garrison Response (all), Skirmish Line, Survey, Interception
--[X] Requirements: Frigate Frame, Medium+ Tactical Subframe, C3+, 60 SR or less
--[X] Currently Filled By: Miranda-A
[X] During the Tactical turn, the options should be as follows, with a suggestion that generally only one role and one profile should be changed each turn (the exception being shifting a ship from one profile to another and modifying both sets of requirements to make it work):
-[X] Add a new Role.
-[X] Modify an existing Role.
-[X] Define a new Profile.
-[X] Modify an existing Profile.
[X] Ships that lack roles may be retired at the discretion of Starfleet Command (likely itself a vote).
Okay, that's long, but I think it's thorough. Basically, how it would work is:
- We define a Role, which is some responsibility we think a ship should fill. Like, let's say in the future we want an Emergency Crisis-Response Fleet that we can snap-deploy to developing situations like the Licori or Hismeri or Horizon or Biophage.
- Then we assign the Role of "Emergency Crisis Response" to the ships Profiles we want to consider for that fleet.
- Or if we want to build a C5 S5 P5 D9 really fast response frigate we create a new Profile with the "Emergency Crisis Response" Role and everything else we think such a ship would be good at.
- Same idea for shuffling ships around. It becomes easy to say "okay, we don't want that ship to do this job anymore" or "okay, our General Cruiser is now a Light Cruiser and we'll define a Heavy Cruiser Profile".
e: To give a practical example, let's say we wanted to transition the Excelsior-A out of the Explorer Corps.
We would:
- Re-define the Heavy Explorer Profile to increase the requirements to C8+ S8+ P8+ and remove the Excelsior-A from its ship list.
- Re-define the Light Explorer Profile to remove the Five Year Mission Role.
And that's all!
Couple points I may edit based on feedback:
- Should the Combat Frigate have the Skirmish Line as a secondary role?
- Should the Connie-B be a Support Cruiser or a General Cruiser? I have it at Support Cruiser right now because we want to transition it there eventually.
- Unless Oneiros says otherwise, skirmishers are inseparable from minesweepers in the combat engine so that can't be changed.
- Any other misplaced roles or ships?
- Any crucial requirements?
- Is ten years okay? @OneirosTheWriter? And everyone else? Maybe it should be eight?
Since it's mega-late and I'm super tired I'll probably be editing this throughout the day.
e: Oh, I should probably add descriptions to Profiles, but it's bedtime.
[X][ROLES] Plan fill Roles with ship Profiles
Really? I'm fairly sure that was suppose to be Linderley. It was this line:And I'm almost certain said companion was Penelya Miran, which means she never had them legitimately.
that got me thinking that since his retirement vote was a dead tie. It's supported by this:
since as an Admiral Linderley wouldn't have had a chance to practice his fieldcraft in a while.[???] We're getting close. You're an excellent tracker, Nash. My fieldcraft has degraded somewhat, I admit.
He was very surprised when we came out of the woods, and even more surprised when Ilyra leaped down from the treetops onto --------. I knew from reading reports on Lecarre that she could electrocute him in a second, so I had to drop my phaser and quickly tackle her.
Good catch.Really? I'm fairly sure that was suppose to be Linderley. It was this line:
that got me thinking that since his retirement vote was a dead tie. It's supported by this:
since as an Admiral Linderley wouldn't have had a chance to practice his fieldcraft in a while.
I can also say with near certainty that it can't be Miran because the unknown person is male:
Oddly enough I think this sort of thing is exactly up Linderley's line of work. This whole adventure was a spy-on-spy fight with our spies trying to counter the enemy's spy. I'd bet you that a young Linderley spent most his days hunting down Klingon spies and saboteurs across the region of space now known as the KBZ.Good catch.
I didn't imagine Linderly as the direct fieldwork type. I've always seen him as that guy who sits behind a desk doing ALL THE ANALYSIS. And with the number of Penelya on Risa bits, my mind jumped to her being Nash's ally.