lbmaian
a thirsty squirrel
- Location
- USA
and <300 level affiliates. We may not be mandated to protect and support them, but I'm confident that it's frowned upon if we don't respond to events around or concerning them.Of course, that fails to account for the "deterrence value" of border zone forces and that they are supposed to intercept the nastiest and trickiest events.
- LBZ: Laio, Tauni (yes, they apparently are the responsibility of the LBZ according to a prior captain's log, and are about to be 300+ major affiliates anyway)
- CBZ/Ferasa: Ashidi (unclear which sector fleet would be responsible for escorting diplomats/trade ships to the Ashidi - likely a new sector/BZ in the coming years)
In fact, I'd include neutrals in that as well. We know how critical such events are for us, especially for countering rival major powers.
- SBZ: Sydraxians, Yrillians, Gretarians (not critical itself, but linked to Sydraxians)
- LBZ: Licori
- Ferasa: Lamarck (not sure if important after Hishmeri threat gone), Dawair (not a neutral, but a polity we're maneuvering to break off the Ashalla Pact)
Expansionist ho!
And hopefully it remains that single "main thing"!@OneirosTheWriter did a very clever thing by creating the Gabriel Border Zone. It's the main thing keeping us from flooding sectors with more event responders, and it provides a constant tension in deciding how much to commit there.
Oneiros is constantly finding ways to throw new threats and distractions at us to keep our forces spread thin in our burgeoning Federation. To the point that the player base was complaining in 2315 about how we were dealing with crisis after crisis without breaks and an increasing annoyance at Council complaints when we didn't have enough ships available for event response then.