Let's say we receive a distress call outside our own space. Current Starfleet policy, not captain's discretion, actual policy, says that we are obligated to respond to a distress call.

Presuming we have accurate information on what the Hishmeri Septs are doing here (and if it's nefarious), I don't see why this situation is materially different from a distress call. Sure, we figured out what was happening on sensors, but the reason that it is Starfleet policy remains the same: we are obligated to help people in need. Period.


You are conflating 'policy, obligated' and what I see as a standard starfleet operating procedure. Obligated = diplomatic/legal repercussions for not responding, when I'm pretty sure that its at the captains discretion. Do you have a source on it being a obligation under treaty?

You have also lept from responding to a request for aid to 'starfleet must help anyone in need, anywhere, even if they don't ask for it'.
 
We're already on a partial war footing.

except we are not really that much at war footing with anyone right now

See: GBZ, that more skirmish / busk war then and thing really war like

Arcadian War.
is over and we pretty much won

I seriously doubt it will end up in a situation where a SOE is needed, but we should still maximise our chances of peaceful resolution. Ironically, the way to do so is through a 150C fleetball.

really do not see the point of sending a large fleet too something that we do not even know what it is?
yes raiding so god dammed many levels or raiding! if SF had to go too war over everyone that raider planets we think we needed to protect we would have gone too war with the klingons (again) orians and who knows how many others

all that we know is that there are report of a possible raid going on, lets not go defcon 4 just because a raid
send a ship to find out what is going on and keep the fleet close for if we need it
could we, oh i don`t know try to be diplomatic and not go to war with the next minor race??
 
You are conflating 'policy, obligated' and what I see as a standard starfleet operating procedure. Obligated = diplomatic/legal repercussions for not responding, when I'm pretty sure that its at the captains discretion. Do you have a source on it being a obligation under treaty?

You have also lept from responding to a request for aid to 'starfleet must help anyone in need, anywhere, even if they don't ask for it'.
I addressed both those things in the same post. I'm not talking obligation under treaty, I'm saying obligation under general policy and moral obligation, a moral obligation that is designed into Starfleet policy. Obviously there can be exceptions, but this is in essence a ROE that Starfleet operates under. Breaking ROE requires extraordinary reasoning. A captain or flag officer who did so would be forced to justify themselves.

Yet another example: rescuing civilians during a battle between the Ked Peddah and Licori. No one requested our aid, yet we did so anyway.

The latter point was specifically rebuffed already. We do in fact normally go help people even if they don't ask for it.

Don't play semantic games please. Address the actual argument.
 
Last edited:
Note: even High Priestess of the Prime Directive Captain Janeway intervened when she found out two Ferengi were interfering in a pre-warp civilization. So it's really just a fig leaf for more practical concerns.

If we can find a way to convince the Hishmiri to leave, we should take it. I suspect with nomadic raiders they will only believe our words have weight if we have a fleet at our backs. A fleet of 50C would help that under the least optimistic estimates; a ~100C optimal fleet would spook even the Apiata were they the aggressors. If we frame this as sending a stern warning to the Hishmiri now I'm hoping the fact it will keep Cait out of harms way down the line will pull N'Gir onside.
 
You are conflating 'policy, obligated' and what I see as a standard starfleet operating procedure. Obligated = diplomatic/legal repercussions for not responding, when I'm pretty sure that its at the captains discretion. Do you have a source on it being a obligation under treaty?

You have also lept from responding to a request for aid to 'starfleet must help anyone in need, anywhere, even if they don't ask for it'.
In the specific context of distress calls, people actually ARE obligated to respond to distress calls as a matter of international law. This is one of the reasons there are strong laws and customs against abusing distress signals (the way the Sydraxians did by coercing a Gretarian freighter into making a distress call to lure Endurance into a trap some years ago). It is a custom strong enough that if a captain actually ignored a distress call you could expect an inquiry by higher authorities, and depending on the consequence of the action, the captain might be censured or even relieved of command.

Now, the question of whether captains have an obligation to act when there has been no unambiguous signal of distress is a bit muddier. But basically, it is simply not true to claim that Starfleet has no obligation to assist distressed persons or groups outside its borders. The obligation is clearly finite; a ship is not required to, say, risk destruction by a more powerful enemy in order to repsond to a distress call. But ignoring a situation where someone is clearly in trouble does go against the spirit, and sometimes the letter, of important policies.
 
But yeah I think you hold that belief to some degree because as I said otherwise it doesn't make much sense to me to worry about the things you do, at least not to that degree. If the Hishmeri aren't a cartoonish race of spacemongols then we won't need that an obvious show of force to convince them of the fact that attacking us is a bad idea.
Oh for crying out loud!

Look, the Hishmeri are a nomadic culture, and the very name 'septs' implies a decentralized tribal culture. They don't have to be cartoonish spacemongols. They just have to be exactly what we've been told: Spacegoing wanderers, with a penchant for raiding when they think the odds are in their favor. Think about real life cultures that match this description (except for the 'spacegoing'). The Norse (and some of their descendant cultures like the Normans), who weren't nomadic but did wander a lot. The Goths circa 400 AD, the Turks circa 900 AD. The Comanche circa 1800 AD.

I'm deliberately avoiding nomadic people who are specifically legendary for being utterly cruel and devastating to all in their path... but the examples I can think of are pretty alarming in their own right.

Deflecting people who operate like this is certainly possible, but mere persuasion is not enough. Generally you either have to pay them tribute (decreasing their incentive to take risks to rob you), or you have to be very, very persuasive (i.e. offering to help them attack your joint enemy and share the profits of doing so).

Or you have to make it unambiguous that you possess more armed force than they can overcome. As to why this is the case...



Let me point out some of the limitations of trying to convince the Hishmeri to go away using diplomatic envoys and navigational charts and well-worded threats.

Suppose that instead of being the mighty, expansive, and technologically sophisticated ruler of the Federation, you are playing as the Lecarre.

Your scouts have detected the Hishmeri migration wave, a few months out from your space- they could actually reach you a matter of weeks, if their warships pick up speed and head straight for your homeworld. Your own fleet, being small and a bit primitive (say, Combat 50) isn't useless; it could probably chase away a fair number of Hishmeri raiders, even if they're well armed and operate in squadrons. But if the whole migration fleet (say, Combat 100+, maybe even 200) united under common leadership, they could roll right over your defenses and plunder everything you have that can be towed away in a spaceship.

The usual Lecarre practice of hiding isn't going to help here; the Hishmeri WILL find you, you cannot hide your entire star system-wide civilization and all its signals including the ones you've already emitted. What would you do?

Well, the first thing you'd do is get on the phone with the Cardassians and scream for help, obviously. However, suppose help is not forthcoming. Or that the help is insufficient ("we'll send two Jalduns and four frigates") Or that the help is likely to arrive late (e.g. "sure, we'll need four months to mobilize a fleet and work it around to you in a way the Federation doesn't think of as us trying to start Galaxy War One.").

Crud. Now what do you do?

You lie like a rug, that's what you do!

...

You might boast and exaggerate the power of your own defenses, or the prowess of your people as warriors. You might claim to have secret weapons that will annihilate the Hishmeri if they come too close. You might talk about your most powerful and unforgiving masters, the Cardassians, who love you well for your invaluable services and have already sent a great armada to defend you, one that will arrive shortly! You might dwell upon the might of the Cardassian fleet with its scores of heavily armored warships. Or upon the ghastly and degrading tortures that await any enemy of the Cardassian Union so unlucky as to fall into their hands.

Or you might tell exciting yet plausible lies to the Hishmeri, about the weakness and vulnerability of some other target (e.g. the United Federation of Planets). Why, less than ten years ago, one of the Federation's favored allies, the Caitians, went to war with your good friends the Dawiar. The Dawiar are of course valiant, albeit... technologically primitive... not that you'd recommend attacking them! Anyway. The Dawiar went to war with the Caitians, and the Federation did not enter the war on the Caitian side. One of their closest friends, a friend so close they later made a member of that species president, and they didn't fire a single shot in their support, against an opponent that only invented warp drive less than forty years ago, they're that primitive. Not that you'd recommend attacking the Dawiar, braver warriors cannot be found!

Anyway, the Federation. Surely, the Federation must be a bunch of weaklings. And their territories are far more expansive, and much richer, than yours. So you say to the Hishmeri, rather than risk the unfailing and brutal wrath of Cardassia, why not divert course a little and follow these helpful maps over to Federation space...? Of course, naturally this map clearly marks the boundaries of Dawiar territory and their main fortifications and bases, so that they may give your valiant allies a wide berth!

...

Note that none of this requires the Hishmeri to be ogres or evil cartoon characters. They just have to be exactly what we already know they are: a nomadic spacefaring civilization with a sizeable fleet, plus a habit of raiding when they get the chance and think they can get away with it. The entirely natural reactions of other species in the regions they pass through will do the rest.

And the Hishmeri are probably used to this happening. They've met a lot of species. They may never have met the Lecarre before. But I suspect they meet someone like the Lecarre- namely someone with weak defenses who is comfortable with telling boastful lies or selling out a neighbor to protect themselves- every few years.

From their point of view, the kind of scenario I describe happen may have been happening every few years for the past several centuries. Someone wants to use the Hishmeri against an enemy. Someone is afraid of the Hishmeri and exaggerates their own defensive strength. Someone is afraid of the Hishmeri and tries to make another target for raiding seem more inviting.

What do these people do? They lie. The Hishmeri hear a lot of lies. They don't have a very clear picture of what's in front of their fleet out of range of their advance scouts. Much of what they do hear contradicts itself. The only way to really be sure who is strong and who is bluffing, who is unsafe to raid and who is safe, is to go see for yourself- to press forward until you actually get the measure of their defenses. Preferably not in battle, it's better to avoid unnecessary battles... but at the very least, you push forward until you hit a solid reason to stop. Fleets are solid; words aren't.

...

Notably, the Lecarre probably already have this problem, whether they know it or not. So do the Dawiar, though the Dawiar are less likely to make shit up and more likely to just shoot a bunch of Hishmeri in the face with a metric ton of torpedoes, then growl "all right, which one of you thieving scum wants to be next?" Because the Dawiar are fierce like that.

It is entirely possible that the Hishmeri are already getting all kinds of weird ideas about what does or does not exist in Federation space, what the Federation will or will not do in order to protect itself and its affiliates. Moreover, this kind of thing has probably happened to the Hishmeri many times before. They are used to being lied to, either by people who want to redirect their advance to hurt an enemy*, or who just want to scare the HIshmeri away from their territory for fear of getting raided and beaten up.**

...

The Hishmeri will have learned from long experience that they get lied to a lot, and that the only way to be sure who does and does not have the defensive strength to deter their raids is to find out by direct observation.

So informing them in a kind yet stern manner that we would prefer that they avoid our space might work, but there's a pretty high risk of it not working. They've heard it before.

Informing them in a kind yet stern manner that we would prefer that they avoid our space from the flagship of a battlegroup is more likely to work, because the Hishmeri have more reason to listen if we speak to them in a louder voice.
_____________________________________________

*("The Klingons are your old enemies, OF COURSE you want to use us to hit them in the back, oldest trick in the book, eyeroll, eyeroll, what's in it for us? Seriously, ante up enough dilithium to power the fleet for a few years and stop bullshitting us")

**("OF COURSE you're a peace-loving people who are just so gosh-darn nice! It's not that you just happen to lack the power projection to establish a tributary relationship with a prewarp culture only a few sectors away from the home planet of your president. Couldn't possibly be that! Yeah, I know, you boast about your war with the random people we've never heard of who OH GODS OF SPACE THEY BLOW UP WHOLE SUNS!!! Oh right, pull the other one, it's got bells on. Hey Hrun, remember that time the giant chicken-men of Zabriska XII tried to convince us that they'd just defeated the Grand Master Planet Eaters and would effortlessly massacre our fleet if we took their stuff? Yeah, that was rich. I mean, I've still got that cloth-of-gold rug I took from their Grand Archpriest, and the throw pillow stuffed with tail-feathers we plucked from their High Council at vibro-javelin-point, and I'm not feeling very massacred yet, you know?")

I simply see to disagree with you on this point since I think that for people as advanced as we and the Hishmeri are there are hundreds of different way's to convince each other without requiring something as brute as what you propose.
You disagree with a strawman version of my position and are ignoring important points that I have already made. I do not think the HIshmeri are cartoon characters. But historical precedent and common sense suggest that given that the Hishmeri are exactly what we've been told... it will take a considerable impetus to convince them to go around Federation space. Words alone are unlikely to supply the relevant impetus.
 
Last edited:
We're already on a partial war footing.

except we are not really that much at war footing with anyone right now

See: GBZ, that more skirmish / busk war then and thing really war like

Arcadian War.
is over and we pretty much won

I seriously doubt it will end up in a situation where a SOE is needed, but we should still maximise our chances of peaceful resolution. Ironically, the way to do so is through a 150C fleetball.

really do not see the point of sending a large fleet too something that we do not even know what it is?
yes raiding so god dammed many levels or raiding! if SF had to go too war over everyone that raider planets we think we needed to protect we would have gone too war with the klingons (again) orians and who knows how many others

all that we know is that there are report of a possible raid going on, lets not go defcon 4 just because a raid
send a ship to find out what is going on and keep the fleet close for if we need it
could we, oh i don`t know try to be diplomatic and not go to war with the next minor race??
Okay, if you are going to quote my posts, quote them properly. Don't just copy and paste. There's literally a quote button under every post! This is so much worse than spaghetti posting.

Also, use proper English.
 
Something Simon said earlier have me an Idea. what if we offered the Septs enough BR/SR to either go another direction or to attack the Cardassians with the promise of more BR\SR for every Cardassian ship destroyed. By the time the Cardassians can muster a large enough fleet to chase them out of their territory. The Septs will have done enough damage to set the Cardassians war timetable back several more years.
 
Something Simon said earlier have me an Idea. what if we offered the Septs enough BR/SR to either go another direction or to attack the Cardassians with the promise of more BR\SR for every Cardassian ship destroyed. By the time the Cardassians can muster a large enough fleet to chase them out of their territory. The Septs will have done enough damage to set the Cardassians war timetable back several more years.
No. Just no.

Frowning_Stesk.webm
 
Something Simon said earlier have me an Idea. what if we offered the Septs enough BR/SR to either go another direction or to attack the Cardassians with the promise of more BR\SR for every Cardassian ship destroyed. By the time the Cardassians can muster a large enough fleet to chase them out of their territory. The Septs will have done enough damage to set the Cardassians war timetable back several more years.

*Councilman Stesk frowns disapprovingly*
 
Something Simon said earlier have me an Idea. what if we offered the Septs enough BR/SR to either go another direction or to attack the Cardassians with the promise of more BR\SR for every Cardassian ship destroyed. By the time the Cardassians can muster a large enough fleet to chase them out of their territory. The Septs will have done enough damage to set the Cardassians war timetable back several more years.
The second will get the Council on our ass. Do you want Stesk to get angry at us? Because that's how you'd do it.

The first.... eeeeehhhhh. I don't think alot of Councillors will like the idea of paying the Hishmeri off.
 
Something Simon said earlier have me an Idea. what if we offered the Septs enough BR/SR to either go another direction or to attack the Cardassians with the promise of more BR\SR for every Cardassian ship destroyed. By the time the Cardassians can muster a large enough fleet to chase them out of their territory. The Septs will have done enough damage to set the Cardassians war timetable back several more years.

So Stesk and the Hawks will vote the same way on this, which is a once-in-a-lifetime event.

Billions for defense but not one ounce of danegeld, no matter how you dress it up.
 
Violation of Rule 4: "Don't be disruptive"
Okay, if you are going to quote my posts, quote them properly. Don't just copy and paste. There's literally a quote button under every post! This is so much worse than spaghetti posting.

Also, use proper English.
and instead of bitching about my english or my lack of skill`s with the quote system how about you address the point made

i always find that those that do not do so and bitch about anything else do not have a good response

so thank you for telling me i won that little debate then, good to know
 
If I weren't worried about the side effect I wouldn't object to bribing the Hishmeri to go away, because I'm pretty sure they will go away. The core reason to resist paying tribute is because of the risk that the person you're paying will come back next year looking for more, which is a terrible deal in the long run IF you have enough of a military to stop them if you're willing to fight. If there's no risk of the person you're paying off returning for more tribute in the foreseeable future, this isn't so much of a problem.

Trouble is... side effects. More on that below.

Something Simon said earlier have me an Idea. what if we offered the Septs enough BR/SR to either go another direction...
We can probably do that and it isn't necessarily a bad idea as such, although it has downsides like setting bad precedents. How do you think the Cardassians will react to knowing the Federation will hand over a pile of resources to avoid the possibility of having to fight a comparatively minor war, without receiving anything in return other than "no war?"

I'm imagining them spending the next fifty years dreaming of big pinatas with UFP logos painted on their side.

or to attack the Cardassians with the promise of more BR\SR for every Cardassian ship destroyed. By the time the Cardassians can muster a large enough fleet to chase them out of their territory. The Septs will have done enough damage to set the Cardassians war timetable back several more years.
The Cardassians would reasonably consider this an act of war and actively hurt us at every opportunity forever (e.g. encouraging the Goshawnar and Konen to harass our clients harder). The Pacifist members of our own government would veto this idea in advance and hate us for decades if we went through with it anyway. Moreover, if the Septs are where we think they are, going to Cardassia would be a huge course change for them and they would have to sail around large blobs of Seyek and Qloathi space to get there.

This is a bad idea and some of us have already discussed and rejected it earlier in the discussion.
 
and instead of bitching about my english or my lack of skill`s with the quote system how about you address the point made

i always find that those that do not do so and bitch about anything else do not have a good response

so thank you for telling me i won that little debate then, good to know

If you write like a drunken spider walked across your keyboard, expect to be called out for it. And the way you mix yours and Alpha's arguments without quote boxes makes it difficult to tell what you're actually arguing. If you want intelligent responses to your posts, write intelligently.
 
Are we starting another argument? Might I redirect you to QQ's High Noon thread so you can duke it out and leave us out of it?
 
and instead of bitching about my english or my lack of skill`s with the quote system how about you address the point made
It doesn't have to be by using bbcode, but you absolutely do need to use something to distinguish things you are quoting from things you are saying yourself, otherwise you are making your posts unreasonably difficult for everyone else to read. Or just don't copy-paste quotes at all and just mention/paraphrase what each of your points is addressing like in a verbal conversation. Even if you expect AlphaDelta to recognize his own statements you aren't having a private conversation with him.

EDIT: I guess different approaches to capitalization and punctuation do an adequate job of separating the quotes once you become aware of them, so never mind.
 
Last edited:
Something Simon said earlier have me an Idea. what if we offered the Septs enough BR/SR to either go another direction or to attack the Cardassians with the promise of more BR\SR for every Cardassian ship destroyed. By the time the Cardassians can muster a large enough fleet to chase them out of their territory. The Septs will have done enough damage to set the Cardassians war timetable back several more years.
This is so un-federation it isn't even funny.

Giving them resources to avoid us? Sure, maybe.

Bribing them to go through Cardassian space, raid and pillage the Cardassians and put a bounty on their ships? Ha! Fat chance. We are peaceful, and generally try to avoid conflict in all forms, especially inciting it purposefully. The only times we have gone to war have been due to existential threats to the sector (Arcadia) or out of defense (Klingons, Biophage). Also, if word ever got back to Cardassia about that, which it would, it would be an instant violation of the Treaty of Celos.

We aren't cold war America and Russia here.
 
Last edited:
Guys, if someone never says anything interesting or worth reading, just put them on Ignore; you will lose a surprisingly small amount by doing so. It's a rule I'm learning to live by, and it's a lot more satisfying than bickering.
 
Back
Top