I don't think that The Hishmeri Septs are some dark, alien threat from Deep Space hell-bent on destroying and plundering the Federation who are too stupid to understand that enraging the Federation is a less than optimal idea without having shoved a massive fleet into their face.
...Before I go on to reply to the rest of your post, and I do have a reply in mind...

Do you actually think that I DO believe this? Because if you think that after all I've already posted, that's kind of insulting.

And if you DON'T think I believe this, I fail to see why you led with it.
 
It probably wont work because we already had a bunch of contact, but I like the idea of appearing with a megatortoise and two excelsiors and then having the local captain send them some transmission like "Please retreat. Another group of a cruiser with two frigates like the one you see here already is close by, but I really dont want to do the paperwork to get some proper capital ships to show up."

Having each member fleet with distinct designs and our allies send just a single ship could also be a nice way to show of what awaits them if they really want to escalate.
 
Am I the only one concerned with all these suggestions of unilateral actions outside our borders?

It's one thing to have fleet manuvers and set ultimatums inside our territory, dictating terms externally doesn't seem like the Federation way, those are the actions of a very different sort of empire.
 
This is "unilateral" only insofar as we are "unilaterally" defending ourselves and protecting the interests of someone who can't protect themselves. I don't think 'unilateral' is an insult in this context.
 
Ah yes, the "preemptive strike" school of thought on "Defense". Alternatively we could stay within our borders and actually defend our territory.

They have free passage in unclaimed space, and unless the council is declaring war on the back of the pre-warp incident, we should not hinder them. We could send diplomatic envoys to them with navigational data on our borders and convey exactly how unwelcome they are, we can also send a humanitarian mission to those needing assistance.
 
We could send diplomatic envoys to them with navigational data on our borders and convey exactly how unwelcome they are
We don't even know what's going on over there at the moment; all we know is that some unspecified number of space nomads have encountered what appears to be a pre-warp civilization. For all we know, the Hishmeri will need to be rescued from Mirror!Organians, or something equally wacky.
 
Am I the only one concerned with all these suggestions of unilateral actions outside our borders?

It's one thing to have fleet manuvers and set ultimatums inside our territory, dictating terms externally doesn't seem like the Federation way, those are the actions of a very different sort of empire.
Does unilateral really even have meaning in what is essentially unclaimed space? It isn't like we are policing Cardassian clients here or something. And for that matter, if it is essentially a fleet going out to warn a known threat to stay away from our borders before they get to those borders then it isn't even unwarranted. You can talk about preemptive strike all you like, but preemptive negotiation is a far better description, IMO.

And again, this prewarp civ is like the kid that wandered onto the train tracks. They're essentially innocent in all this and unable to communicate if they need or want help.

The fact that we know they need it in some fashion should be enough to compel at least some sort of action, no?
 
Last edited:
Ah yes, the "preemptive strike" school of thought on "Defense". Alternatively we could stay within our borders and actually defend our territory.

They have free passage in unclaimed space, and unless the council is declaring war on the back of the pre-warp incident, we should not hinder them. We could send diplomatic envoys to them with navigational data on our borders and convey exactly how unwelcome they are, we can also send a humanitarian mission to those needing assistance.
It's not a preemptive strike if all we do is encourage them to take another route via Klingon Negotiation (Show of Force) and if the other option is to stay inside our borders until a 200C raiderball shows up. Or multiple 50C raiderballs.

I'm in favor of aggressive (by Federation standards) action - intercepting them early, and conducting negotiations with the help of some Excelsiors.
 
I'm for unilateral action outside our borders, as a general policy. It is one of the things the Explorer Corps does routinely.
Seconded. There is another Point I need to point out that I think everyone has forgotten. Where are we going to get the ships to do this? We need a taskforce of at least 70 to 90 C or better to make a point. And I don't think we have enough ships nearby to do that.
 
@Erandil :

There are a lot of innocent reasons you might not have yet replied to my question asking for clarification of the rather insulting way you opened your post. I am not accusing you of dodging that question, but I will repeat it here, then reply to the rest since I can delay no further, and must assume you meant what I think you meant.

I don't think that The Hishmeri Septs are some dark, alien threat from Deep Space hell-bent on destroying and plundering the Federation who are too stupid to understand that enraging the Federation is a less than optimal idea without having shoved a massive fleet into their face.
It seems to me that you are attributing or at least implying that this is my opinion. Despite the many posts I have in the last several pages emphasizing that the Hishmeri are almost certainly nowhere near as villainous as some posters made them out to be. I am insulted. But- moving on.

I mean really, we have talked with them on several occasions now (and they had some time to talk with the other factions in the region too) which one would suspect is more than enough to convey some idea of just who and how powerful we are - those are not some illiterate barbarians incapable imagining anything beyond their own limited existence/territory but a culture that may well be older than the Federation itself, capable of reason and logic.
Yes, but we also know that they have a habit of raiding when they think they can get away with it. Nomadic cultures that practice raiding against settled peoples tend to have a related complex of behaviors and practices. Such as a belief in gaining glory and status through successful raids, an awareness that superficially strong defenses often conceal hidden weaknesses, and an automatic skepticism towards outsiders trying to drive them away with mere words. All these secondary traits are necessary to perpetuate the raiding culture among an intelligent, competent group of people.

It is very important that we convince them that raiding us is a worse choice than flying around our space, before they reach our space. As much before that time as possible; preferably most of their fleet will divert course and go away before it even gets within one or two subsectors of our border. Some septs may not get the word, or may not believe we're as formidable as we're made out to be, and they will probably push closer and maybe even try to penetrate into our space. But if we show a fear of engaging the Septs in combat, they are likely to parse that as us doubting our ability to do so.

This does not mean we have to fight them. But it does mean we have to go out of our way a bit to convince them we have the ability and the will to fight them.

Basically, they're an old nomadic polity that's seen a lot. They've probably seen tough, well-organized empires that can drive them off easily. But they've probably also seen collapsing empires and loose confederations that an ambitious bunch of raiders can swoop in on, where raiders can settle into a single area, and live like kings while pillaging constantly. Remember that this is exactly what the Hurq found when they invaded our region of space- it's happened before and tales of it happening are probably still around on some level.

So are we a tough organized power that can drive them off easily? Or are we a decadent empire that lacks the power to muster a strong defense? From the Hishmeri's point of view, there are only a few ways to really know the answer to that question. Listening to our diplomats probably isn't one of them... but seeing one of our fleets show up in enough force to deter their operations is.

The sooner they encounter this physical evidence of our ability to organize and defend ourselves, the better, because the less the risk will be of them coming close to our space and having a few specific septs trigger incidents by being "too close."

The idea of strengthening the patrols the border is not so that we can intercept waves of attacks like a bulwark but simply to make it clear to them that we are watching them, that this is our space and that attacking us won't go unnoticed. If they aren't criminally stupid that and some clear talk should be more than enough to convince them to stay away... You don't need a massive fleet to do that which is why it is cheaper, easier and safer to do so.
The problem is that if the Hishmeri see only a small fleet, they have little reason to avoid raiding. They know that we know that they're coming, so they will assume that the ships they see protecting the border are a pretty representative sample of all the ships we have available to protect that border. If they see the border fleet scattered out in penny packets of one or two ships separated by days of flight time, they're likely to think that if they move quickly or stealthily, or if they concentrate effectively, they may be able to cut past the border patrols and hit vulnerable border targets, then escape our space before we can catch up with them. They may even be right.

If they see large, well organized fleets capable of overawing their raiding squadrons, operating independently to contest the space near our border... they have much more reason to take the strength of our defenses seriously. Furthermore, the operations of such a fleet will ALSO discourage the Hishmeri from loitering in the subsectors near the border while claiming to be free to do as they please in "unclaimed territory." Because that is also a scenario that could readily lend itself to trouble.

Hishmeri loitering on our doorstep aren't as bad as Hishmeri physically in our space, but they are bad enough to make me think we'd need the same kind of 'big fleet' against them when they loiter at the border than the kind that we'd need to operate out in unclaimed space.

Ah yes, the "preemptive strike" school of thought on "Defense".
This is a grossly dishonest way to present my recommendations.

The bare suggestion that we dispatch a large fleet into unclaimed space is not REMOTELY the same as advocating a 'preemptive strike' on the Hishmeri. I am extremely comfortable with the idea of drafting rules of engagement that prohibit Federation forces from firing first on the Hishmeri under any circumstances, except (if the Council so pleases) to enforce ultimatums the Council sees fit to draft, such as "don't do anything to the prewarp planet without the locals' consent" or "don't cross this plane in space."

It would undermine the point of sending the fleet if there were no such exceptions, but I would still consider this plan better than passively waiting at the border and hoping they take our hints that we don't want them around.

A concentrated 60C task force might well be able to convince many Hishmeri that the Federation is tough enough to not be worth trying to raid by operating well away from the border. The same task force, spread out across the border, is unlikely to be able to do that if the Hishmeri are willing to take enough risks.

Alternatively we could stay within our borders and actually defend our territory.
There is literally no 'international law' of any kind prohibiting us from sending a fleet into unclaimed space, or telling us it is wrong to do so. I do not for the life of me understand where this objection of yours is coming from.

They have free passage in unclaimed space, and unless the council is declaring war on the back of the pre-warp incident, we should not hinder them. We could send diplomatic envoys to them with navigational data on our borders and convey exactly how unwelcome they are, we can also send a humanitarian mission to those needing assistance.
Should we hinder them from robbing or plundering prewarp civilizations in the area? And don't say "that is up to the Council." The point is, we can't do that unless we're prepared to operate a task force outside our space. And such a task force will significantly enhance our ability to convince the Hishmeri to go away, because they won't have to cross our border to find out that we are actually able to cope with them.

It's not a preemptive strike if all we do is encourage them to take another route via Klingon Negotiation (Show of Force) and if the other option is to stay inside our borders until a 200C raiderball shows up. Or multiple 50C raiderballs.

I'm in favor of aggressive (by Federation standards) action - intercepting them early, and conducting negotiations with the help of some Excelsiors.
Very much this. I don't want to fight the Hishmeri, but it's imperative that we convince them to go away, and minimize the harm that they do on our watch. At the very least, we need to signal to them that we are not merely a decadent, overripe power for them to try to pluck... because if they believe that up to the moment they cross our border, we will have to fight some very unpleasant battles to convince them otherwise.
 
To tackle the argument from the other side, since Simon seems to have the practical aspects covered:

Let's say we receive a distress call outside our own space. Current Starfleet policy, not captain's discretion, actual policy, says that we are obligated to respond to a distress call.

Presuming we have accurate information on what the Hishmeri Septs are doing here (and if it's nefarious), I don't see why this situation is materially different from a distress call. Sure, we figured out what was happening on sensors, but the reason that it is Starfleet policy remains the same: we are obligated to help people in need. Period. That is why we must respond to distress calls, and it is why we must respond to this situation. It is an obligation we cannot get away from through administrative tools like borders, or neutral zones, or treaties, or anything else. The only thing that would make it questionable is a Prime Directive issue, and that is not the case here as the Hismeri Septs are a warp species. Maybe also if we had a the few vs the many scenario, but again, that is not the case here either.

For example, the most respect we pay a neutral zone is to inform the other party that we are entering it to respond to a distress call. We did this with a Kadeshi ship that we found in trouble. For another example, the Kobiyashi Maru scenario necessitates violating a neutral zone and most choose to do so despite treaties. There are dozens of examples in the captain's logs of this very thread where we roll out to help someone outside our borders. Just as often without a request as with, for example, the recent Gretarian colony plague intervention was signals interception, not because they asked for us.

The Atuin would have intervened before the Septs arrived if it had arrived in time and succeeded the check. There would have been no hand-wringing on whether to intervene or not. This is because intervention is our policy already.
 
Last edited:
well i some ppl that have changed the tone from 'lets wait and see' to 'send a fleet in and see what they do then'

i`m all for sending a ship in with maybe a fleet setup for back-up. no need to go full war footing if we can dodge that.
let us have a look what is going on and figure some things out before we go all 'grr, kill' shall we please
 
Incidentally, what exactly would the Federation do with pre-warp civilizations that have been irrevocably affected and had contact with other alien powers?
 
well i some ppl that have changed the tone from 'lets wait and see' to 'send a fleet in and see what they do then'

i`m all for sending a ship in with maybe a fleet setup for back-up. no need to go full war footing if we can dodge that.
let us have a look what is going on and figure some things out before we go all 'grr, kill' shall we please
The situation has changed, so of course people have changed their plan. Now that we know there's a pre-warp civilization out there, "wait and see, defend our borders" has the very real possibility of the Hishmeri raiding them. Parking a fleet between the Hishmeri and the pre-warp civilization would, hopefully, prevent that by convincing the Hishmeri that taking on Starfleet just to raid one planet is just not worth it.

Nobody is arguing that we should drop a fleet on them to drive them away, only that we stop them if they try to raid us or the pre-warp civ.
 
well i some ppl that have changed the tone from 'lets wait and see' to 'send a fleet in and see what they do then'

i`m all for sending a ship in with maybe a fleet setup for back-up. no need to go full war footing if we can dodge that.
let us have a look what is going on and figure some things out before we go all 'grr, kill' shall we please
We're already on a partial war footing.

See: GBZ, Arcadian War.

I seriously doubt it will end up in a situation where a SOE is needed, but we should still maximise our chances of peaceful resolution. Ironically, the way to do so is through a 150C fleetball.

While we may not be able to rouse a 150C fleetball, I'd prefer at least 100C of assets committed to our show of force, including a mega-tortoise.
 
It seems to me that you are attributing or at least implying that this is my opinion. Despite the many posts I have in the last several pages emphasizing that the Hishmeri are almost certainly nowhere near as villainous as some posters made them out to be. I am insulted. But- moving on.

Yes, but we also know that they have a habit of raiding when they think they can get away with it. Nomadic cultures that practice raiding against settled peoples tend to have a related complex of behaviors and practices. Such as a belief in gaining glory and status through successful raids, an awareness that superficially strong defenses often conceal hidden weaknesses, and an automatic skepticism towards outsiders trying to drive them away with mere words. All these secondary traits are necessary to perpetuate the raiding culture among an intelligent, competent group of people.

It is very important that we convince them that raiding us is a worse choice than flying around our space, before they reach our space. As much before that time as possible; preferably most of their fleet will divert course and go away before it even gets within one or two subsectors of our border. Some septs may not get the word, or may not believe we're as formidable as we're made out to be, and they will probably push closer and maybe even try to penetrate into our space. But if we show a fear of engaging the Septs in combat, they are likely to parse that as us doubting our ability to do so.

This does not mean we have to fight them. But it does mean we have to go out of our way a bit to convince them we have the ability and the will to fight them.

Basically, they're an old nomadic polity that's seen a lot. They've probably seen tough, well-organized empires that can drive them off easily. But they've probably also seen collapsing empires and loose confederations that an ambitious bunch of raiders can swoop in on, where raiders can settle into a single area, and live like kings while pillaging constantly. Remember that this is exactly what the Hurq found when they invaded our region of space- it's happened before and tales of it happening are probably still around on some level.

So are we a tough organized power that can drive them off easily? Or are we a decadent empire that lacks the power to muster a strong defense? From the Hishmeri's point of view, there are only a few ways to really know the answer to that question. Listening to our diplomats probably isn't one of them... but seeing one of our fleets show up in enough force to deter their operations is.

The sooner they encounter this physical evidence of our ability to organize and defend ourselves, the better, because the less the risk will be of them coming close to our space and having a few specific septs trigger incidents by being "too close."

The problem is that if the Hishmeri see only a small fleet, they have little reason to avoid raiding. They know that we know that they're coming, so they will assume that the ships they see protecting the border are a pretty representative sample of all the ships we have available to protect that border. If they see the border fleet scattered out in penny packets of one or two ships separated by days of flight time, they're likely to think that if they move quickly or stealthily, or if they concentrate effectively, they may be able to cut past the border patrols and hit vulnerable border targets, then escape our space before we can catch up with them. They may even be right.

If they see large, well organized fleets capable of overawing their raiding squadrons, operating independently to contest the space near our border... they have much more reason to take the strength of our defenses seriously. Furthermore, the operations of such a fleet will ALSO discourage the Hishmeri from loitering in the subsectors near the border while claiming to be free to do as they please in "unclaimed territory." Because that is also a scenario that could readily lend itself to trouble.

Hishmeri loitering on our doorstep aren't as bad as Hishmeri physically in our space, but they are bad enough to make me think we'd need the same kind of 'big fleet' against them when they loiter at the border than the kind that we'd need to operate out in unclaimed space.

Sorry I was busy with university and then researching something for a paper...

But yeah I think you hold that belief to some degree because as I said otherwise it doesn't make much sense to me to worry about the things you do, at least not to that degree. If the Hishmeri aren't a cartoonish race of spacemongols then we won't need that an obvious show of force to convince them of the fact that attacking us is a bad idea. I simply see to disagree with you on this point since I think that for people as advanced as we and the Hishmeri are there are hundreds of different way's to convince each other without requiring something as brute as what you propose.
 
Incidentally, what exactly would the Federation do with pre-warp civilizations that have been irrevocably affected and had contact with other alien powers?

FDS running an uplift program. Starting by figuring out how to do the uplift and limiting further contact with other alien powers.

Well, depending on the alien power that performed the contact.
 
Seems to be entirely dependent on the type of contact.

Intermittent contact? Some warp-capable species playing as gods? Invaded by an evil empire? Most of these scenarios we could conceivably be justified in removing the negative influences and leaving. Depends on the degree though.

Someone swooped in, went "take me to your leader", and started a friendly uplift? Now they're regulars in the interstellar community and local stations, despite not having warp drive themselves? Not much that can be done in that case.
 
Back
Top