Cornuthaum
Be kind to each other.
- Location
- Austria
- Pronouns
- He/Him
"YOU CANNOT TAKE MY SHIP FROM ME REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"
"YOU CANNOT TAKE MY SHIP FROM ME REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"
Changes to Explorer Panel of Captains
Out: T'Lorel, Victoria Eaton
In: Maryam Ajam, Michel Thuir, Langa Mbeki, T'Rinta, Talan th'Zahliss
Current Personnel Pool:
Standard Starfleet: 14.9 Officer, 24.9 Enlisted, 2.4 Techs
Explorer Corps: 0.5 Officer, 2 Enlisted, 1.25 Techs
Starfleet Academy:
Officers (O): 5.45pts (+1.25 Explorer Corps)
Enlisted Crew (E): 6.45pts (+1 Explorer Corps)
Science Techs (T): 6.05pts (+1.25 Explorer Corps)
[ ][ACADEMY] No Change
[ ][ACADEMY] Emphasise Officers (5.95/5.95/5.55)
[ ][ACADEMY] Emphasise Enlisted (4.95/7.45/5.55)
[ ][ACADEMY] Emphasise Techs (4.95/5.95/6.55)
[ ][ACADEMY] Custom - Shift up to 1 pt any Crew type
;Continued Diplomatic Push
Betazoids 335/500 + 29 = 364/500
Amarki 412/500 +12 = 424/500
Hmm, if we want to keep building Excelsiors, we need a good number of Officers, so I don't like the idea of shifting people away from O.
At the moment, the only ship class that uses a lot of enlisted personnel is the Constellation, and I don't think we will want to build more of those.
The question is what do we want to build next. Of course we will continue to build Excelsiors, but how soon will we begin to build Renaissance class ships, who would take a lot of Enlisted? Or do we want to build Centaurs or even Oberths, who need more Techs?
Let's not use different wordings for identical votes.[X][ACADEMY] Emphasize Techs Purely at Expense of Enlisted (5.45/5.45/7.05)
Is that acceptable?
I guarantee we will build more Centaurs and Oberths before we build our first Renaissance.
Annual Income*:
Bulk Industrial Resources: 305br
Special Industrial Resources: 215sr
Research Points: 57rp (35+5 Caldonians+5 Biroth)
Political Will: 32pp (25 - 5 for Nash ka'Sharren + 5 for Valentina Sousa)
We'll have to find out what the bonuses are for all of these people. Looks like we have three Explorer ships to assign.
Okay, I don't quite understand what's happening here. Our current Academy output is 5.45 + 6.45 + 6.05 = 17.95
Some of the new options are less than that.
5.95 + 5.95 + 5.55 = 17.45
4.95 + 7.45 + 5.55 = 17.95
4.95 + 5.95 + 6.55 = 17.45
????
What I woukld like to do is:
[X][ACADEMY] Emphasize Techs Purely at Expense of Enlisted (5.45/5.45/7.05)
Is that acceptable?
;
Finally a decent Betazoid roll!
Please use the version of the vote with the fixed number of techs (I edited while you were reading the Rat Race post and you didn't refresh the page it seems)
I'm pretty sure that's either a clerical error or a temporary caretaker role. We should still be able to pick someone else if we so choose.Two Explorer captains to assign, Ajam was shifted to Courageous and Ka'Sharren is staying on Enterprise (I wouldn't be surprised if she stayed on that ship until we retire it.
???
Can someone post where McAdam's bonus is listed? I can't seem to find it...
But who will perform the T'Lorel Maneuver now?
A nice way to sneak a weapons tech team past the Federation CouncilClearly we now have the opportunity of putting T'lorel in charge of the Federation Institute of High Energy Diplomacy.
And even then we need a recruitment drive to make it.Hm, I guess we'll have to crew that Excelsior due '08 with Explorer Corps instead of this one. Shame.
Hm, I guess we'll have to crew that Excelsior due '08 with Explorer Corps instead of this one. Shame.
We're talking about the Excelsior being built at 40 Eridani, crew deducts next year. For the one after that it deducts 2308.We already deducted crew for this new ship. That's why our explorer pool is so low to begin with.
We're talking about the Excelsior being built at 40 Eridani, crew deducts next year. For the one after that it deducts 2308.