especially if phasers are now going to be scaled by mass; the Darwin is lighter than the Newton.
Wow, wait a sec, when did this happen?? Another phaser mechanic update?? Are these getting threadmarked, because if our military technology mechanics keep changing we kinda need to know for voting purposes.
[X] Forward Rapid Launcher (Cost 53 -> 65)
[x] Two Forward Torpedoes (Cost: 53 -> 57.5)
Not sacrificing science on the altar of fear. If you wanted aft dps, you should have voted for the phaser.
Yeah, this thread's turning into a group psychology study; we don't have a coherent long-term agenda so come up short, then we suddenly react in fear (suboptimal, we missed 3 votes that would've made this ship quite a tough little cookie), now it looks like we might be overcompensating, then we'll go back to having no long-term agenda and our capabilities again become unfocused and come up short. This is a post-war design, I'm all for going heavy armaments, but we've decided
against having warp 8 sprint speed or aft phasers, so it doesn't make sense to max out the concentration of armaments budget here. Why oh why can't people come up with a coherent plan?
We could however next make a very heavily armed warp 8 utility cruiser (super-cruise config, enhanced range, some cargo space,
optional general science, something like 4 fore 2 aft torpedo launchers, maxed out sublight speed) with our latest warp and military technology, phase out the Cygnus class once and for all and make something even better than the Newton. But somehow people want to pimp out our survey ship, which is a dedicated science and survey ship, now that we've crippled its ability to fully participate as a warship.
Sigh.
And then when we realize we need something that can hit hard, the dreadnought idea comes out again. So our forces are even more concentrated and vulnerable to attrition by a numerically and technologically superior foe.
No it hasn't did you somehow misread the latest update? Starfleet got fucked. loosing that many ships in a few months hurts. So we should totaly build better armed vessels to forestall a repeat of the circumstances that lead to it in the first place.
Spamming weapons everywhere isn't the answer either. We need
more weapons yes, no argument. But we also need something of a coherent plan so that designs with the highest speeds and near our borders etc are mounting the bulk of our best shields and weaponry. Sticking all these weapons on a survey ship will
help, sure, but it's not the
best place for them. It won't even be released until
after the war. It also has sharp limitations on max speed that hamper its ability to participate in front line actions. By the time it's deployed in full on conflict the v4 nacelles or warp 9 drive may be deployed, making it even more obsolescent.