Starfleet Design Bureau

*heavy sigh*
Well, seems like even a literal war isn't enough to get the "We'll just do it later, this costs too much" crowd to not choke in the clutch, and we are for the third time sacrificing the best possible design on the altar of "but cost". *Sigh* and here I was hoping we could pull out the S rank Tactical ship to go with our S rank science and engineering ships. oh well.

Given our armament and maneuverability plus EITHER winning vote getting us shields as strong as canon, frankly I'll be surprised if we don't get an S Rank tactical anyway. No, what I'm worried about is a solid D in cost.

Honestly, if it wasn't for the prototype roll I'd be voting for standard covariant, but in the current situation I don't want to take that gamble.
To reiterate, we don't have prototype rolls anymore.
 
Last edited:
The only covariant worth using on this ship is the heavy version and the only reason the standard is getting people voting for it is them deluding themselves it's better somehow.
No delusion at all. They've convinced themselves it's better than the heavy type 1 (which is somewhat understandable, regardless of if it's correct or not) and Cheaper than the heavy covariant by enough to matter. Which it absolutely is.
To reiterate, we don't have prototype rolls anymore.
Unless it was changed Again, we do, but it works very differently from before. Temporary downside for the first batch of ships if it fails, no long term effect on the tech either way.
Do tell us if That was Also thrown out (or renamed?), because it was relevant to a number of people's decision making.
 
Last edited:
[x] Standard Covariant [36 Shields] (Cost 79.25 -> 104.75) [Second Tranche: 73.25 -> 93.75]

We desperately needed to advance our shield technology yesterday.
 
Given our armament and maneuverability plus EITHER winning vote getting us shields as strong as canon, frankly I'll be surprised if we don't get an S Rank tactical anyway. No, what I'm worried about is a solid D in cost.


To reiterate, we don't have prototype rolls anymore.

Yes we do, they just only apply to the first run of ships in the class.
 
Its funny, people scream about cost but then shell out for the extra expensive option that is not a sure thing and more expensieve then equal alternative, i don't get it, its even worse because the standard grid is never going to be as good as the large one!

Edit: By which I mean either cheap out and take the standard large one as cheap and powerfull system or go all in and take the large covariant all others are not worth it paradoxically screams about cost still lead to people taking the wrong choice!
 
Last edited:
[X] Standard Covariant [36 Shields] --- (Cost 79.25 -> 104.75) --- [Second Tranche: 73.25 -> 93.75]
[X] Heavy Covariant [44 Shields] --- (Cost 79.25 -> 116.75) --- [Second Tranche: 73.25 -> 103.25]

Went and read through the thread.

Some people actually want to ban approval voting? The hell? I'm going to approval vote my top two options just because of that.

Improving durability by 20% is obviously worth a 10% increase in cost anyway.
 
Given our armament and maneuverability plus EITHER winning vote getting us shields as strong as canon, frankly I'll be surprised if we don't get an S Rank tactical anyway. No, what I'm worried about is a solid D in cost.


To reiterate, we don't have prototype rolls anymore.
Prototype rolls still happen
No, shields don't have any internal volume.


I don't see why it wouldn't? @Sayle is there a prototype effectiveness roll for covariant shields?
Yes, but only affecting the first build order in this case.



I'd assume shields would only be replaced like-for-like. So light-light, standard-standard, heavy-heavy.


Also I can confirm the Canon Constitution had a Build Cost of 84.
Having the first tranche which is going to take the brunt of the attention from the Klingons get shafted because of bad rolls would be disastrous.
 
Its funny, people scream about cost but then shell out for the extra expensive option that is not a sure thing and more expensieve then equal alternative, i don't get it, its even worse because the standard grid is never going to be as good as the large one!
Might want to double check if it's the same individuals, because usually it mostly isn't, and sometimes it's because new information or good arguments changed their minds.
Some people actually want to ban approval voting? The hell? I'm going to approval vote my top two options just because of that.
I saw people trying to get those who were approval voting the top two options to switch to voting one way or the other, but I missed anyone suggesting that approval voting be banned. This is exactly the sort of vote where it's a good thing, to my mind.
 
Last edited:
Adding approval vote

[X] Type-1 Standard [27 Shields] --- (Cost 79.25 -> 84.75) --- [Second Tranche: 73.25 -> 78.75]
[X] Type-1 Heavy [36 Shields] --- (Cost 79.25 -> 97.25) --- [Second Tranche: 73.25 -> 91.25]
 
I saw people trying to get those who were approval voting the top two options to switch to voting one way or the other, but I missed anyone suggesting that approval voting be banned. This is exactly the sort of vote where it's a good thing, to my mind.
Its really not, if all votes where one choice only people would have to make a choice what they want then vote on it and try their best to convince others to follow suit, not taking 3 out of 4 and calling it a day because they dislike one thing in particular.
 
Its really not, if all votes where one choice only people would have to make a choice what they want then vote on it and try their best to convince others to follow suit, not taking 3 out of 4 and calling it a day because they dislike one thing in particular.
Counterpoint, it prevents every voting block from being automatically split.

Its funny, people scream about cost but then shell out for the extra expensive option that is not a sure thing and more expensieve then equal alternative, i don't get it, its even worse because the standard grid is never going to be as good as the large one!

Edit: By which I mean either cheap out and take the standard large one as cheap and powerfull system or go all in and take the large covariant all others are not worth it paradoxically screams about cost still lead to people taking the wrong choice!
There is, in fact, such a thing as a compromise position.
 
Last edited:
[X] Standard Covariant [36 Shields] --- (Cost 79.25 -> 104.75) --- [Second Tranche: 73.25 -> 93.75
 
Rule 3: Be Civil
[x] Standard Covariant [36 Shields] (Cost 79.25 -> 104.75) [Second Tranche: 73.25 -> 93.75]

We desperately needed to advance our shield technology yesterday.
So you want to advance shield tech? Then please explain why you decide to go with the stupid standard and not the heavy one and do not say cost as you have allready accepted you have to shell out for the good stuff.


Counterpoint, it prevents every voting block from being automatically split.


There is, in fact, such a thing as a compromise position.
Oh the dreaded compromise the solution that is usually the worst of both that makes no one happy yes lets ake that!
 
Type-1 Heavy is better than Covariant standard. Same on paper strength without the chance of having a significant portion of the produced hulls with weaker than expected protection due to a bad roll, cheaper to placate Starfleet bean counters a little. and the chance to refit to Covariant Heavy later on.
 
So you want to advance shield tech? Then please explain why you decide to go with the stupid standard and not the heavy one and do not say cost as you have allready accepted you have to shell out for the good stuff.



Oh the dreaded compromise the solution that is usually the worst of both that makes no one happy yes lets ake that!


No but really. "Good enough" is what wins wars. What succeeds in general in fact. The hard part in this case is that Starfleet Intel dropped the ball and we don't know what Good Enough actually is.
 
Type-1 Heavy is better than Covariant standard. Same on paper strength without the chance of having a significant portion of the produced hulls with weaker than expected protection due to a bad roll, cheaper to placate Starfleet bean counters a little. and the chance to refit to Covariant Heavy later on.
They won't listen, they want the shiny no matter what they have to tell themselves.
 
Back
Top