Comedians are the World's Policemen. Because they walk softly and carry a big Schtick. :D:ogles::stickouttongue2:

Boo! Boo I say! I was taking a big bite of meaty pasta when I read this. I almost had pasta all over my computer screen, keyboard, and flying out my nose. Well, technically it's not "meaty pasta". The can says
Chef Boy-Ar-Dee said:
Lasagna
pasta in tomato and meat sauce
 
Fixed that for you.

Carol obviously despises Amy and wants her out of her life. The fact that she hasn't turned Amy out on the street has more to do with the fact that she'd get splattered against a wall by the law and probably lose the daughter she does love than it has to do with her own feelings on the matter.

Pretty sure they're talking about Carol not letting Taylor use Restoration on Mark.
 
To clarify :

The initial discussion was about Taylor dropping Greater Restoration on Mark Dallon. However, Carol could probably stand to have one dropped on her as well. The problem being, without their consent, it could be spun into Assault with Powers. Whether or not it would stand up in court, who knows? However, if there is one thing Carol knows how to do, it's raise a legal stink.

Re: What Carol's legal specialty is, I don't know. However, I think it's canon that she works at the same law firm as Alan Barnes. She could specialize in parahuman law, which kind of makes sense. Mainly, defending New Wave from the results of Vicky's "Enthusiasm".

*edit* If the wiki is accurate, Carol is a criminal lawyer, and does work at the same firm as Alan Barnes.
 
Last edited:
1) She said "file a complaint", not "bring charges." That could very well mean complaining to her bosses about her behavior.

2) If her lawn or house had been damaged, Carol would have been absolutely in the right to file a criminal complaint. Destruction of another's property without permission is vandalism, even and especially if it's incidental in performing a "prank." Likewise, filing suit for civil damages to be compensated for the cost of repairing the damage would be perfectly reasonable as well.
1) Yeah, I realized that on re-reading. Probably complaining to the PRT. It's a dumb fucking thing to complain about, but people complain about dumber.

2) If her House had been damaged, she could have filed a civil complaint, yes. As a lawyer she should know that all she can do is make the report; the city prosecutor decides if formal charges are brought. The lawn is a shakier proposition, given that the damage would have been caused by "walking on it."
 
i though Taylor was going to this meet and great thing at New Wave's place was because Dean wasn't coming? Also considering the fact that she is a ward New Wave really doesn't have any ground to stand on in terms of authority on her other then the family of some of her friends and really have no business giving Taylor the riot act on her Lung fight
 
No, they should use the Hogwarts motto. "Never tickle a sleeping dragon" certainly applies when it comes to Taylor. She might be a very nice girl, but as we saw with Lung, give her a reason and she will come down like the Wrath of God on you!

I like the earlier one better:
"Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup."
 
The initial discussion was about Taylor dropping Greater Restoration on Mark Dallon. However, Carol could probably stand to have one dropped on her as well. The problem being, without their consent, it could be spun into Assault with Powers. Whether or not it would stand up in court, who knows? However, if there is one thing Carol knows how to do, it's raise a legal stink.
So, if a Combat Situation occurs where Taylor is using her powers as a healer and can reasonably cast either Greater Restoration or another spell with a similar effect (up to and including using a bloody Wish to undo the effects of Bakuda's bombing spree on everyone in the city) then she would likely be covered by Good Samaritan Laws, right? (For the wish itself, after seeing glass statues left by a bomb attack, "I wish everyone in the city was effected by a Greater Restore spell" would be good wording, and would cover not only the petrification of the Glass Bombs, but also any other eligible exotic effects.)
 
I like the earlier one better:
"Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup."

I don't think that's quite the tone the PRT want. Then again, Tia used a variation with Miss Militia.

So, if a Combat Situation occurs where Taylor is using her powers as a healer and can reasonably cast either Greater Restoration or another spell with a similar effect (up to and including using a bloody Wish to undo the effects of Bakuda's bombing spree on everyone in the city) then she would likely be covered by Good Samaritan Laws, right? (For the wish itself, after seeing glass statues left by a bomb attack, "I wish everyone in the city was effected by a Greater Restore spell" would be good wording, and would cover not only the petrification of the Glass Bombs, but also any other eligible exotic effects.)

Wouldn't it be hilariously ironic if this also depowered every parahuman in the city because their power is being granted by a parasitic entity?
 
Last edited:
No, they should use the Hogwarts motto. "Never tickle a sleeping dragon" certainly applies when it comes to Taylor. She might be a very nice girl, but as we saw with Lung, give her a reason and she will come down like the Wrath of God on you!
i'm reading a story right now where that motto came about because Hogwarts' wards are powered by "the last of the Elder Dragons", that the founders had imprisoned in a small pocket universe. problem is, that prison is not quite perfect, and the dragon has been picking away at it for the last few centuries. it wasn't a nice dragon 1500 years ago, and it's only gotten angrier since.
 
Carol needs sooooo much therapy. Ye Gods. A toxic home life is an understatement for Amy. Still, glad that Taylor asked Dean about it. And I find it amusing that Dean warned her to not hurt Amy. Has Taylor given off hints of attraction towards our grumbly healer?
"I can turn invisible, surround myself with silence,
Oh joy. Ninja Dragon.
I am now picturing a Gold Dragon wearing Ninja Gear, with shuriken stars and ninjato.

That image is HILARIOUS!​
 
Hrm. How does one accidentally on purpose provide some mental healing to someone who would reject it claiming that they don't have a problem? AoE healing after an endbringer fight, maybe?
Is there anyone around who can inflict brain cancer on her? Or maybe make her think she has it?

Time for Taylor to talk to Tiamat about her concerns for Amy and have a "hilarious misunderstanding," methinks...
 
Re: What Carol's legal specialty is, I don't know. However, I think it's canon that she works at the same law firm as Alan Barnes. She could specialize in parahuman law, which kind of makes sense. Mainly, defending New Wave from the results of Vicky's "Enthusiasm".

*edit* If the wiki is accurate, Carol is a criminal lawyer, and does work at the same firm as Alan Barnes.

The Wiki is accurate, however the canon is bullshit. A law-firm like that wouldn't specialize in both criminal and divorce law, and Alan is a divorce lawyer.

2) If her House had been damaged, she could have filed a civil complaint, yes. As a lawyer she should know that all she can do is make the report; the city prosecutor decides if formal charges are brought. The lawn is a shakier proposition, given that the damage would have been caused by "walking on it."

Yes, and filing a report is called "making a complaint." ;)

Also, there's a difference between "walked on," and "torn the fuck up by massive-ass dragon claws." Could she lose the suit? Sure. But it has enough prima facie merit to not be dismissed out of hand as frivolous if there was substantial damage that needed a landscaper to come in and repair.

Wouldn't it be hilariously ironic if this also depowered every parahuman in the city because their power is being granted by a parasitic entity?

That's an active connection. It might temporarily depower them while the Shard goes WTF?! and reboots the link, at most.

Hrm. How does one accidentally on purpose provide some mental healing to someone who would reject it claiming that they don't have a problem? AoE healing after an endbringer fight, maybe?

Depends on if she has access to Heal or Mass Heal. Those are higher level spells, but heal for quite a bit (70 on one target and 700, spread as you choose across a 60ft AoE, respectively) and come with Restoration built in.
 
That's an active connection. It might temporarily depower them while the Shard goes WTF?! and reboots the link, at most.

Unless of course the Restoration (or Remove Disease) spell doesn't treat the connection as a harmful effect to be removed from the body. In which case, the shard would be going "WTF" as it metaphorically stares at the severed link. Especially possible if done as part of a Wish, since those rarely work out exactly as you planned.
 
Wishes are.... tricky. In general, the more specific the phrasing of the wish, the more likely it will not screw the wisher over. Usually, using a wish to cast a lower level spell over a larger defined area, or even to cast a spell that would not be available due to class, will work out alright if the spell is identified by name, and will avoid the usual penalties if cast as a spell. Wishing for a spell like effect is trickier, but may work out right. Being vague at all is BEGGING for fate to screw you over.

One fanfic author described his old D&D settings by mentioning that the God with dominion over Wish spells in those worlds is a CN Trickster God of Mischief. Most DMs don't bother to define things out that well, but in general, when a poorly defined Wish is granted it will be in a manor that is most amusing to someone other then the one making the Wish.
 
Wishes are.... tricky. In general, the more specific the phrasing of the wish, the more likely it will not screw the wisher over. Usually, using a wish to cast a lower level spell over a larger defined area, or even to cast a spell that would not be available due to class, will work out alright if the spell is identified by name, and will avoid the usual penalties if cast as a spell. Wishing for a spell like effect is trickier, but may work out right. Being vague at all is BEGGING for fate to screw you over.

One fanfic author described his old D&D settings by mentioning that the God with dominion over Wish spells in those worlds is a CN Trickster God of Mischief. Most DMs don't bother to define things out that well, but in general, when a poorly defined Wish is granted it will be in a manor that is most amusing to someone other then the one making the Wish.

Or as the opening of one of my stories puts it, Magic is alive. And it doesn't really like granting Wishes for petty things. And sentient beings that are granting the wish? Yeah, pushing your luck is not a good idea. Nor is annoying them.

EDIT: Here is the passage I mentioned.

Faerie said:
Any wizard worth his beard can tell you about magic. Real magic that is, not the stuff done in Vegas or on television. One of the most important lessons about magic is that it is alive. One can harness it, guide it, sometimes even force it to do what you want. But in the end magic has a will of it's own. The more powerful the spell or artifact, the more self willed it is. The best magus are more akin to diplomats then the common man might expect.

Another thing that any skilled spell caster can tell you is that magic has a sense of humor. It also does not like to be abused. The problem then becomes the question of 'what does magic consider abuse'? No two wizards will give the same answer. If one were to ask a three hundred year old woman named Cologne she would tell you that only alchemical potions are reliable. Another person of extreme old age would swear up and down that only scrolls and talismans are safe to use.

While it's little known, it is a fact that wish granting talismans are some of the most potent items of magic. They have to be to remake reality at the wisher's request. Of course, this also means they are sentient. It is for this reason that wishes are rarely granted exactly the way the wisher intended. Rarely is it someone makes a wish that isn't self gratification. And this annoys such talisman to no end. The more self serving the wish, the more likely it is to be messed with.

Another thing wish granting talisman hate is someone using their power to try enslaving another. Such wishes always backfire, if they are even granted in the first place. And when dealing with djinn or other actual entities that are granting the wish it can be suicidal. Not always, it depends on the mood of the djinn. It also depends on how long the entity had been sealed in a container fifty times smaller then it's self.
 
Last edited:
Carol Dallon frowned. "Potential to be very dangerous, especially if she loses control."
Really Carol? Fucking really? I know you have PTSD out of the ass but come on! Im pretty sure she looked at her track record as a ward, which so far has been stellar except for that Lung issue but her judgement of the situation at the time was sound. If Taylor was a Rogue i could understand her suspicion, but she is a government hero, she fits nicely in that little White and Black morality bubble in which she so delusionally lives, but you are treating her with suspicion?
Agh i can't stand Carol Dallon i really can't. And Lady Photon, while a little better is just an enabler. Had it been my sister i would have scheduled therapy and gone with her to the sessions till she confronted her problems, but noooooo New Wave cant have bad press!
I hate how people forget that Parahumans are also Humans and are not perfect or above the entrapments of Humanity, i blame the PR team of the PRT on this btw.
Carol has always pissed me off, I can understand her trust issues and I don't blame her for it but she takes it to far and makes me doubt her actual ability as a lawyer because she is so biased. Nothing is truly black and white except the Divine and even then most are made of shades of grey.
I agree with you, and what makes it funnier about her trust issues is that she acting like the ones who kidnapped her and Sarah towards Amy and she doesnt realize it. I mean come on there is something called nature over nurture. Amy may have been a villain's daughter but she never was exposed to the underworld by her father, what Carol should have thought when she took Amy in even if it was gritting her teeth should have been, "If i raise her like Victoria with a heroic mindset she wont turn like her father and the heroes gain an asset if she ever gets powers. It will be a drag but it will be a final fuck you to Marquis" (not that he would have minded but eh)
That said, no one has ever said she was a criminal lawyer, she could be a divorce attorney, estate, or a half dozen other types of lawyer
She is a Lawyer that specializes in Parahuman Law, however i dont remember if that is Canon or Fanon.
Carol obviously despises Amy and wants her out of her life. The fact that she hasn't turned Amy out on the street has more to do with the fact that she'd get splattered against a wall by the law and probably lose the daughter she does love than it has to do with her own feelings on the matter.
First splattered by the law and then splattered by Victoria. No matter how she may be pre leviathan and everything that made her grow up but she is a sister bear to Amy. And she is not stupid, even during her glory girl days, careless, yes, stupid, no. The moment she hears the tipical bad seed approach that Carol takes with Amy she is going to dig a trench and take out the heavy artillery against Carol, it wouldnt be out of character for her
 
A law-firm like that wouldn't specialize in both criminal and divorce law, and Alan is a divorce lawyer.
There are general practice firms that will handle almost anything that walks through the door. I've known attorneys who handled both divorce and criminal work. There are also full service 'big law' firms that have actual specialists in a wide variety of areas. The idea there is that wealthy clients can retain one firm that can handle whatever legal needs arise.

I think you and @Ferretshock might be getting civil and criminal procedure mixed up a bit, but it's not really important to the story.
 
Last edited:
So, @FaerieKnight79, in the context of that story, does that mean a Wish to avert a disaster, cure a pandemic, or help a great many people will likely be granted in a way that least screws over the selfless (or at least, benevolent) wisher? Say, a wish that an incoming tsunami would not strike, or a forest fire would be extinguished, or that an erupting volcano would stop erupting, for instance? After all, even though these wishes would benefit the one making the wish, they aren't exactly selfish in that they would also benefit everyone in the area...
 
Question: Does Naurelin need Carol's permission to cast Restoration on Mark, or does she need his?

Also, is Wards canon in play? I.e., Is Vicky the product of adultery, and does Amy genuinely suffer from 'bad blood' as Carol believes?
 
Read through the discourse on wish spells and can only agree. There is a reason it is basically discribed as "Politely request something from the GM and pray to god he is in a mood to allow it".
 
No, I believe it is canon that Carol and Sarah's triggers where as young teens/tweens though I would have to look.

That said, no one has ever said she was a criminal lawyer, she could be a divorce attorney, estate, or a half dozen other types of lawyer.
I once ran into a bit of speculation/fanon about why Carol chose to into law. It posited that it was still some of the earlier days of parahumans and before the Endbringers showed up and started attacking regularly, so a lot of the rules surrounding them and how they should be treated was still up in the air. There may have been talk about rounding up and imprisoning all parahumans by some lawmakers, and even if it was just heresay, the possibility made Carol fear for her and her family's freedom, remembering her trigger event of being held captive with Sarah. So she studied to become a lawyer to defend herself and secure that freedom, to have a bit of control of the potential situation.
 
Last edited:
I once ran into a bit of speculation/fanon about why Carol chose to into law. It posited that it was still some of the earlier days of parahumans and before the Endbringers showed up and started attacking regularly, so a lot of the rules surrounding them and how they should be treated was still up in the air. There may have been talk about rounding up and imprisoning all parahumans, and even if it was just heresay, the possibility made Carol fear for her and her family's freedom, remembering her trigger event of being held captive with Sarah. So she studied to become a lawyer to defend herself and secure that freedom, to have a bit of control of the potential situation.

that sounds like the Carol we all know and loathe.
 
Back
Top