- Location
- Illinois
Murders
Catgirls neither, nyan.
Good thing those options are in red. I'm talking about those here.[] Explain Mami's choice to remain ignorant of facts that terrify many Magical Girls.
-[] Check Riona's Witch's name.
-[] Ask Riona to confirm her bombed status.
[] Information sharing:
-[] Waking up half-dead; amnesia; knowledge, random and about the system.
-[] KB's comment about karma level and experiences.
--[] Check Riona's opinion of KB.
[] Figure how far to trust Riona.
-[] Ask after her motives.
-[] Ask what she sees in you.
[] If she sounds good and honest:
-[] Share hypothesis about being created by magic. Wholly, by de-Witching, as part of a larger concept...
-[] Share how many times you've had the coincidence of being able to help someone in need, in the nick of time.
-[] Explain Witch names, Witch runes, how you can read them, and the name in your Ring.
Oh. I was hoping she'd notice, actually, since veB wanted Witchbomb confirmation to be at the top.Good thing those options are in red. I'm talking about those here.
Can you move the "read Rionn*n*n*n*a's witch name" to the point where we actually talk about witch names?
Also, there's a nonzero chance Rion*n+a may detect our attampts to read her witch name. I'm not sure what to do about that (ask for permission? tell we're checking it now? just do it without telling her?)
I constantly advocated for it, and have constantly been ignored. It's aggravating beyond belief.
Setting aside the polygraph model, which I can at least sort of understand objecting to (as it WILL piss some people off), having a subtle, personal lie detector is what we really REALLY useful. Why?Or, I suppose a personal lie detector that's more of a verification of "you seem like you're being truthful, this makes my gut feeling more reliable by about 34%" rather that something we're using for admissible evidence and argument purposes would be a lot less fraught, but even then we'd need to collectively agree on the extent to which we'd rely on it.
I really wanted to try making the lie detector before this meeting, but the evil muse didn't have it happen. We almost got there.Setting aside the polygraph model, which I can at least sort of understand objecting to (as it WILL piss some people off), having a subtle, personal lie detector is what we really REALLY useful. Why?
Because then, if Meguca X promises us that she's not going to go nuke Tokyo with a Clear Seed, we will know immediately if she's lying. We'll know if a supposedly reformed antagonist is actually still trying to kill us, for once. We'll know if someone's lying when they say they're here to help.
Simply put, it's the MOST useful social and political tool we can use with a generally clean conscience, and it helps us keep the people we love alive the world relatively safe.
On top of it, for these purposes, we don't need to have some complex definition of truth or anything--we just need to know if they believe the words they're speaking are false. It isn't complete immunity to deception, of course, but it will go really far towards it--especially if we demonstrate basic competency and don't tell everyone and everything about it. That way, people will not know of it, preventing them for working around it, and allowing us to more effectively deduce where they really stand and how trustworthy they are.
Setting aside the polygraph model, which I can at least sort of understand objecting to (as it WILL piss some people off), having a subtle, personal lie detector is what we really REALLY useful. Why?
Because then, if Meguca X promises us that she's not going to go nuke Tokyo with a Clear Seed, we will know immediately if she's lying. We'll know if a supposedly reformed antagonist is actually still trying to kill us, for once. We'll know if someone's lying when they say they're here to help.
Simply put, it's the MOST useful social and political tool we can use with a generally clean conscience, and it helps us keep the people we love alive the world relatively safe.
On top of it, for these purposes, we don't need to have some complex definition of truth or anything--we just need to know if they believe the words they're speaking are false. It isn't complete immunity to deception, of course, but it will go really far towards it--especially if we demonstrate basic competency and don't tell everyone and everything about it. That way, people will not know of it, preventing them for working around it, and allowing us to more effectively deduce where they really stand and how trustworthy they are.
Indeed, people usually don't react well to stories about meeting an anthropomorphized version of your PIN number.
Just make the thing and, if it works, test with with our friends. Let them know what we're doing, of course.Yeah, that's about what I mean, re, personal lie detector, and I would support that in a vote as long as we were clear about it serving as a personal augmentation rather than an infrastructural modus operandi change. (The latter, I've chattered on about my issues with before, and I won't rehash them here.) My remaining concern there would be that the voter base collectively agree to keep it limited to that extent, and also remember to keep in mind the intersect of "if they believe the words they're speaking are false" and "we define these terms entirely differently and also view their connotations and implications entirely differently".
I have had conversations with someone where I am 100% certain we were both speaking truthfully and in good faith, and it can be nevertheless extremely problematic and aggravating when we run into the issue of "we define these terms entirely differently and also view their connotations and implications entirely differently". If we get a problematic-seeming reading off something someone says, we need to verify that we're taking this into account.
But yeah. For a personal skill development, I'd tentatively support it, so long as we weren't planning to run around using it to (formally or by implication) clear the burden of proof- for example, during the tense discussion about what to do with Oriko, I still would strongly disagree with pointing such a lie detector at her, using it to verify she's not presently intending to be a threat, and then, assuming she's not, using that to argue with Sayaka and Homura's judgement about her future threat rating or to negotiate down the punitive measures taken with regard to her past actions. A lie detector that detects if someone believes what they're saying isn't useful for accounting for someone's future actions if you still judge their character to mean they might change their mind and become a threat later, when new situations or information come up. It is useful for seeing that they're presently a threat to your face, and trying to lie to you about it. Basically, I believe it's viable to use it to determine something is a threat, not to prove that something isn't.
test with with our friends. Let them know what we're doing, of course.
Our close friends should know if we have a lie detector, and we probably should avoid using it while just hanging out
Part of me wants to keep it an absolute secret, for maximum effectiveness, but that's probably the controlling part of me I shouldn't listen to.
I was trying to be distant about this information before.[X] Brief answer to her question immediately. We are a good person, our friends agree, and Kyuubey said our soul was strange. We have few other facts, but we can talk about those.
It is aligned with our understanding, and literally part of our belief. Therefore, we aren't trying to lie. We ARE answering a slightly different question."Johnny Mnemonic - the player dumps a chunk of long term memory so they can do the job."
I don't think we really need to go interrogate O&K. We probably would be better off keeping the lie detector secret from them, based on the fact we still shouldn't 100% trust them (Oriko freely admitted to possibly going out on a murder spree in the future, even).Just so long as we kept in mind the sheer number of secrets being juggled in this group, and tested it cautiously, yeah. @SaltyWaffles has a good plan about this, eh, in the discussion taking place around here. Scrolling both up and down.
Also one of my concerns, but just so long as we were sensible there, yeah.
The lie detector gets added to the infosec list, is probably the course of action there. We've been decent at keeping quiet about things on said list, so.
I don't think we really need to go interrogate O&K. We probably would be better off keeping the lie detector secret from them, based on the fact we still shouldn't 100% trust them (Oriko freely admitted to possibly going out on a murder spree in the future, even).
I think Oriko of all people, would understand.I was meaning mostly the "how do we test the lie detector" part; I've already stated my objections to using the lie detector on O&K for anything besides checking that they're not currently planning to murder us or something.
I'm not thrilled about it, but at least it's not flat out telling her that we were created by a wish. I want to keep that vote from winning.This is in the vote you are part of. Any conflict with your logic?
[Q] If she sounds good and honest:
-[Q] Share hypothesis about being created by magic. Wholly, by de-Witching, as part of a larger concept...
We have no idea whether or not she has any such power.BTW -True or False, are we inside Rionna's lie detector right now?
They take too long to make.
I think Oriko of all people, would understand.
But I'd go for being upfront about things just to stay Honest Good.
I... I think we used up the enchanted Grief with the privacy thing. We are the worst girlfriend.
-[X] Share hypothesis about being created by magic.
--[X] Wholly.
--[X] As part of a larger concept.
There should be plenty of time to hear your plan from start to finish now. A good review is always salutary! What are you cooking?I have a Plan(tm), I just need us to spend an hour alone with her.
Which... I was planning on that being now. Riona's timing suuuuuuuuuucks.
(Do we need to include a '[] do not mention info about X, Y, and Homu'?)... these read really unclearly to me, and I've been following along. I'm not actually sure if you're meaning "we were created whole-cloth" and "we were created with regard to something else" or "share the entirety of our theory about being created by magic, and why" which may include sensitive information. I'm concerned that they could be misconstrued, re, the level of detail of what to share. Wordcount is important, but clarity is starting to suffer a bit.
Also concerned how we've dropped any attention as to how we intend to confirm this, and how well we maintain best practices.
If this means what I think it means, it's just being blunt and straight to the point, and not burden Riona with politeness?
This is factual. I am searching for the factor that makes her behavior rationally explainable. She is not defending herself at all, to a blatant degree. Is it overconfidence? Is it justified confidence? Risk taking? Or does she have an advantage over us, a non-combat advantage?
The most likely possibility is that she just doesn't care about socializing and just wants what she came here for, how we can grief bend.This is factual. I am searching for the factor that makes her behavior rationally explainable. She is not defending herself at all, to a blatant degree. Is it overconfidence? Is it justified confidence? Risk taking? Or does she have an advantage over us, a non-combat advantage?
I don't know either, but my most adverse position is that she has certainty about our responses. An effective lie detector is one way to imagine that. I want to counter that possibility.
I mean, her information might not be subtle. Perhaps when she describes our soul, it will be in unexpected terms? "There's light, pouring of your soul, such that I can't open my eyes fully. It's some kind of church choir in there, many voices, and radiant goodness enough to bleach your bedsheets on the line. I've never seen the like before. Oh, your are Good, alright. Too good...."