Kay. Redshirt, are we in agreement that without precog spiral, nothing we say is actually going to
directly change her mind on this?
'Cause at this point we can back down and try the subtle matchmaking or we can precog spiral her. There
is no counterargument to what she just said without that. We could try to go around it and find some other point as Higure suggests, but...
@Higure, are you sure this isn't Oriko being rebellious towards us in some fashion? It seems like she's calling out our tendency of interfering with everyone and everything until we're comfortable that nobody is dying.
Let's not call Oriko on Kirika, here, that's a
vindictive strategy that will probably bring the conversation in a more hostile direction. I... if we talk about Kirika at all in that context we need to do the subtle pushing thing instead. Trying that angle will make us no friends and win us no victories, because the response to feeling attacked in a conversation is to get defensive.
"Wouldn't you rather have a long, happy life with her instead? Isn't she worth that, to you?"
@AuraTwilight, you're talking to
depressed Oriko.
She doesn't think that can happen and she'll take the question as a slight and/or an insult. Like asking a mourning widow if she wouldn't rather have a long happy life with her dead partner.
This goes double for everyone who is questioning Oriko on this. What she's saying
makes sense to her. Precognition means seeing the future,
perceiving the future. For us the present is the only certain context, but for Oriko, the future has become just as much a fact as the present. Her death and Kirika's alongside her are just as much fact to her as the death of a spouse is a fact to a husband/wife who has been widowed for long enough for the fact to sink in.
[X] Nonvocalized: [the sentiment here is matter-of-fact and "Okay, enough beating around the bush." Body language and other subtextual marks if at all possible should reflect that. You're completely certain of what you're about to say, not because you know it to be fact, but because you have a
wealth of reason to believe it and because you
reject the alternatives.]
[X] Agree. It's absolutely her right to choose death. And you've started to realize just how
real it is to her, recently. Perhaps that was your mistake -- you'd hoped to convince her against the facts as she knew them.
[X] Unfortunately, while her powers are magical and therefore everything they show her is accurate, she is a human and fallible, and her powers will only show her what she wants to see, whether that decision is conscious or not.
-[X] With that fact taken into account, everything else together quite thoroughly. After all, Oriko wished to know the meaning of her
life, not her death. And a wish can only do so much on its own, especially in the face of suicidal depression. She should really see a psychiatrist for that, even if the profession is rather non-Japanese, because clearly we've failed at trying to be one.
--[X] If the feathers are raised as a topic that isn't explained: The feathers are something else entirely, and you'll say no more of them until you have a better understanding of how and why they exist, because they shouldn't.
--[X] If the theory is criticized as being potentially incorrect, note that you're neither an incubator nor a specialist, and either one could be quite reasonably brought in for an opinion.
--[X] If Oriko somehow comes up with a meaningful counterargument to this, cut to voting. Otherwise, as possible, demolish any counterarguments she offers. She is
very obviously both suicidal and depressed; she
wished to know the meaning of her life and she's spent the past two weeks trying to get herself killed on and off.
--[X] If at any time Oriko simply accepts this and then does a self-evaluation using this as fact, cut to voting when a segment endpoint is reached.