- Location
- Illinois
Mumi halp. Catgirl scared.
~I've come to talk with you again~
Oh god I told firn we didn't need any more time and he liked my post. Oh god what's going to happen to us. Oh god.
Now that's an idea that makes sense.
Now that's an idea that makes sense.
Like, it's not that hard. We can make the cat ears and even a tail if we want with Grief.
EDIT: And if we do it now, we might be able to shock Mami out od her Grief. Excellent plan, Explorer.
"Nyaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa..." *Brinasads 'cause Mami didn't think she was cute*Mami: (On phone) "Homura? I need your help! Something happened to Sabrina and she turned cute! I...hello? Hello?"
we'd have to choose between keeping Mami not-spiralling, and our dignity.
We'd do anything for Mami to be happy.And we'd have to choose between keeping Mami not-spiralling, and our dignity.
Oh, who am I kidding?
We had a little before we decided to play maid for Oriko.
[YANDEREBRINA WAVES FROM THE SHADOWS]
But we would never try to Murder the Hypotenuse or go If I Can't Have You. If the situation called for it, we would go I Want My Beloved to Be Happy, instead.
You don't understand the distinction between an idea that is intelligently considered and ultimately rejected (and reasoning for rejecting it is provided and explained), and an idea that is basically dismissed or ignored without intelligent consideration or much explanation.
Like recently: Kaizuki was the only one to even respond to my analysis/ideas at all, IIRC. He only addressed a chunk of one sentence of my post, made a criticism that was already addressed in the original post, and didn't make any significant changes to the vote. I made additional comments, further elaborating on my analysis and criticism with the current vote (which included a fairly simple change), but it was again ignored (unless it was responded to more recently and I just missed it?). While I can forgive Kaizuki not feeling up to adequately responding to my initial post because he was really damn tired last night, that doesn't really excuse doing the same thing the next day, nor does it excuse everyone else doing even less than that.
I would think I'd be given better consideration after I basically predicted that insane MG leader's actions during the "negotiations", then came up with the idea for the Mobile Oppression Fortress and the method with which to decisively win the fight without killing or maiming people, being viciously and personally attacked by a number of people in the thread extensively (with very few people even bothering to try and stand against the flaming and hypocrisy) for such "monstrous" and "stupid" ideas, only for things to go to shit exactly like I predicted they would and for the thread to turn around and do exactly what I proposed to do.
When I provide (relatively) detailed analysis--and my reasoning behind it--in good faith (particularly when responding to a vote, plan, or discussion), I don't think it's too much to ask that it be intelligently (as in, not lazily, tiredly, or dismissively) considered and responded to in some detail in return. Otherwise, there's just no point to me even participating or contributing.
Ugo brought up a counterpoint to the proposed edit, which was that it directly contradicts a certain thing we said in the last post.
Now, everyone in the thread can agree on this: FUCK that thing we said.
But. Contradicting ourselves is...
Think about it for a bit. It's just not... The way I want to deal with that fuckup is to get to a stage where we can literally go, "I didn't mean it like that, Mami! I'm not good at social T_T." Contradicting ourselves in this time and place, on the other hand, carries a large amount of potential risk. It tarnishes our trust-armor, so to speak.
And it doesn't carry a significant benefit in exchange -- not one that can't be created later in a more stable manner.
That's my thoughts.
Salty, I didn't reply to this earlier because I'd been awake more than 22 hours at the time and if I'd tried to I might have said something I'd regret. I'll reply to it now.Like recently: Kaizuki was the only one to even respond to my analysis/ideas at all, IIRC.
This conversation isn't even close to over. I think that there's definitely an intent that we will explain ourselves to Mami in detail in the votes to follow. But right now she's too upset to hear or accept anything of the sort. This vote is entirely about stabilizing Mami and calming her down enough that she's even capable of hearing us out.And second, that for all this was meant to be about Sabrina's fore/metaknowledge, I don't think Sabrina's motives have been touched on, how this knowledge pushed her to rescue people from horrible things, rather than just providing a means to use them for some unknown scheme.