We can just as well say 'we care a lot for Mami but she isn't our Ojou'.Well that's why Kirika told us to be there for her.
Also, I suspect that's the last time we'll say Mami isn't our oujo.
That...doesn't make it better?
I'm saying that Kazumi's the odd one out. It doesn't mesh well with the other series. That its "people" don't act like such at all is just icing on the cake.
Ehhh. Suzune was fine from what I've read of it- admittedly not all- and Tart seems promising from what I know of it.
[Q] "Hello."
Well that's why Kirika told us to be there for her.
Also, I suspect that's the last time we'll say Mami isn't our oujo.
Ehhh, Kirika saying it is good as a guideline. I mean saying stuff we know but need reminding of, that's fine by me.
Can you give a cite for that, other than the Sajyous not dying?
Bolded is false. The only thing that it invalidates it everything after the Sajyous show up in Asunaro.
"Things don't follow the events we know of from a fairly dubious story, therefore the story cannot be treated as an accurate authority on the chain of events" is false now?
Pleiades Saints cookies."Things don't follow the events we know of from a fairly dubious story, therefore the story cannot be treated as an accurate authority on the chain of events" is false now?
Yeah, no, timeline divergences on larger scales are a thing that happens and has happened.
Point is, the manga's useless for predicting anything with certainty right now unless actively demonstrated to be accurate. For all we know, the Saints all signed up for the Girl Scouts and are seeking to recruit girls for love and justice from all over Japan.
Everything exploding is confirmed to be going to occur, we know how to stop it from happening so lets stop it, it doesn't matter if it happens the same way or not, everything selfdestructing is bad even if it happens realistically rather than as in the manga."Things don't follow the events we know of from a fairly dubious story, therefore the story cannot be treated as an accurate authority on the chain of events" is false now?
Yeah, no, timeline divergences on larger scales are a thing that happens and has happened.
Point is, the manga's useless for predicting anything with certainty right now unless actively demonstrated to be accurate. For all we know, the Saints all signed up for the Girl Scouts and are seeking to recruit girls for love and justice from all over Japan.
We know there's a car and that it's being driven around. We don't know if the cliff is real or just a distant billboard in this case...But we know the roads in general aren't well maintained.
You left out the part where Sabrina realizes, IC, that events are proceeding differently from the manga, I think?
Anything Sabrina 'realizes IC' is just thread chatter being repeated enough, though.
Ehhh.
The point is that you cant take "metaknowledge is invalid after X point" and say it means "meta knowledge is invalid, full stop", which is a logical fallacy and what you've been doing."Things don't follow the events we know of from a fairly dubious story, therefore the story cannot be treated as an accurate authority on the chain of events" is false now?
Yeah, no, timeline divergences on larger scales are a thing that happens and has happened.
Point is, the manga's useless for predicting anything with certainty right now unless actively demonstrated to be accurate. For all we know, the Saints all signed up for the Girl Scouts and are seeking to recruit girls for love and justice from all over Japan.
Metaknowledge is invalid when we have reason to believe that it isn't an accurate depiction of events and we KNOW major timeline differences are a thing in PMAS.
eh, fair enough. I take a "valid until indicated otherwise" stance regarding canon, and the only direct contradiction is the Sajyou's not dying.
