Lights... Camera... ACTION!!: A Hollywood Quest

IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT
Hi Magoose here one of the guys helping Duke.

So we have some bad news.

The quest has been canceled as duke does not want to write it anymore.

I'm going to ask if I can take over for it, because I like this quest, and it would be a shame to kill it
TBF, Mags, you have been doing a lot of the heavylifting for the quest, so this will be in good hands. :)

To be clear to everyone, this is just me burning out on imagination of the quest, since my muse has been hitting me over the head a lot with so many different ideas that I just can't find myself too interested in this.

I'll still hang out here, though, since this still does have a sepcial place in my heart.

I'd like to thank you all for making this a wonderful experience while it lasted.

I'd also like to thank @Magoose, @Fluffy_serpent, and @Martin Noctis for doing so much to help prepare and write this quest. I couldn't have done it without you all. :D

I'll see you all around.

With so many regards, Duke William Of.
 
Last edited:
Just because Sunrise is greatful and working with us, does not mean they want to be subordinate to our directors, nor do they want to meet as many of our deadlines or ideas.

They will still try, but they do want to try and do more of their stuff as well.
Hey, I want them to do their own stuff too. I mean, I don't want to butterfly awawy Cyborg 009 or their latest gems in Cowboy Bebop and Code Geass.

I just want them to be a part of the Lucasfilms Unlimited family while doing so.
half the staff of dreamworks are Japanese. He'll be learning soon enough.

And we'll have plenty of time to swap around and have some good times with Sunrise doing more fun things.

But really if you want Brad to take over, you will need to convince sunrise.
I'm fine with it, as you say there will be other chances for Brad, or any other Director, to swap around and have fun with Anime.

That still leaves us without a Director, but I guess Sunrise must have someone in mind for it. So long as that person is willing to take something new and revolutionary that is.
Quick, everyone! To your writing implements! We must make Omakes of the video being made to promote the series in the U.S.!
Well fortunately you're in luck because Sunrise literally just finished airing a Magical Girl show called Magical Girl Tickle which helped to revitalize the genre after being in a funky hiatus for many years and also was notable as being the first magical girl series to star two magical leads:

So if you want to go for a director go for the show, go with Tickle's Director Takashi Hisaoka. Unfortunately I can't find any info on him, so for all intents and purposes he's an OC, but at least we got some grounded explanation for why Sunrise is doing Magical Girl.
You're a Godsend Kaiser Chris! I was already burnt out with finding the Seiyuus, and I didn't fancy another search into the anime industry of the 70s!
Overmind you need to list the Directors for the live action movies because it's not clear. Also Rocky II should be added to the list of movies currently in production under the informational tab for Lucasfilms.
10-4 good buddy! Will start now!

Edit: Done!
 
Last edited:
Hey Magoose, sorry to bother, but have you decided on the Nat 20 yet? I am still working on the rest of The Unsleeping City, but I feel that Bruce has to be a bit older and more mature to really capture the heart of the show. Mainly the whole storyline around Pete and his experiences with both being Trans and using drugs. I was also wondering if you had anyone in mind that would propose the idea rather than it coming from Bruce himself (the most unlikely source IMO).
 
Hey Magoose, sorry to bother, but have you decided on the Nat 20 yet? I am still working on the rest of The Unsleeping City, but I feel that Bruce has to be a bit older and more mature to really capture the heart of the show. Mainly the whole storyline around Pete and his experiences with both being Trans and using drugs. I was also wondering if you had anyone in mind that would propose the idea rather than it coming from Bruce himself (the most unlikely source IMO).
I will allow it to be made, but in the 80's.

Most likely the late 80's.

As for that nat 20.

That will come when Mike Pondsmith joins the company and Cyberpunk gets started. It's goign to blow the fuck up like DND did IRL.
 
I will allow it to be made, but in the 80's.

Most likely the late 80's.

As for that nat 20.

That will come when Mike Pondsmith joins the company and Cyberpunk gets started. It's goign to blow the fuck up like DND did IRL.
Thanks for the update Magoose! I think that a grittier New York will be for the best in this, especially given how we will have to adjust for how the non-mainstream nature of the LGBT community at the time will be portrayed in the quest world. My only request for the Cyberpunk verse is to have the system rely more on a narrative element a la 5e as compared to 3.5 and helping to establish Gen Con.

Also, what is your personal preference on TTRPG system?
 
Okay, I was looking through the anime director and i found another that could suit our purposes. Looking through his bio, his experiences, as well as his inspirtations, he seems like a good option and I wanted your opinions?

What do you think of Mamoru Oshii for Director of Miraculous?

Because I think he would be perfect!
 
3.5 is the best system.

You can fight me all you want on that, but it's true.

Though I've found being a dm, 5e is the best.
I have the incredibly unpopular opinion of liking 4e. I just liked having cool unique abilities and making everyone feel like their choices matter. It's why I use a lot of 5e as I can kludge things together rather than having to worry about twelve stacking +2 mods suddenly obliterating everything I planned out. I like having different weapons having different effects (whips allowing for reach disarm, hammers and picks ignoring a portion of plated armor, shields being able to be wielded as weapons). I also primarily DM and god I love not needing 4 encyclopedias to run an encounter.
 
So in the next turn or two I definitely think we should get our TV studio up and running as we don't really have a lot of excuses thanks to our 2 billion dollar pool and with the success of Gundam it's showed that tv ventures can be profitable. We don't have too many scripts, but we have enough to get the studio running and dip our toes in TV.

When we get a report on Bruce's finances, I want to finally start to develop the land we have in Beverly Hills and make a return on our investment either through commercial or housing.



@Magoose Where within Beverly Hills would you say our property would be located.
 
So in the next turn or two I definitely think we should get our TV studio up and running as we don't really have a lot of excuses thanks to our 2 billion dollar pool and with the success of Gundam it's showed that tv ventures can be profitable. We don't have too many scripts, but we have enough to get the studio running and dip our toes in TV.

When we get a report on Bruce's finances, I want to finally start to develop the land we have in Beverly Hills and make a return on our investment either through commercial or housing.



@Magoose Where within Beverly Hills would you say our property would be located.
I'm all in into finally making our own TV Studio, and I guess Estate Developement can also be of use. But I also want us to get the rights for The Shining now rather than later and prepare to make an adaptation with Stephen King's help.

Also, let's speak with Marvel once more after the Batman film is released and they see what we can do with only a collaboration.
 
But I also want us to get the rights for The Shining now rather than later and prepare to make an adaptation with Stephen King's help.
I've already said why I'm against it, but I'll say it again. We have genuinely no reason to do this. Kubrick's The Shining is a masterpiece in film making and it would be criminal to erase that in this continuity, but this also synergizes well with another point, that being Stephen King hates that film. By letting Kubrick make The Shining, we get the best of both worlds. Kubrick's The Shining exists, King doesn't like it, and then King turns to us primarily for adaptations because he already heavily favors us after Carrie.
 
@Kaiser Chris Quick question, since you seemed to be the most interested in the Rugrats idea+omake. Do you think I should make any changes to the kids? Like making them more based on Mary, Wallie, Brandon, (I think Dave Alistair has a kid?), etc., or do you think I should keep them the same?
 
Yeah, but if we make a masterpiece of an adaptation that get's the author's stamp of approval that'd also cement his desire to continue to work with us. It'd be the best of both worlds. Namely an adaptation that's truer to the text while still being a great film.

I can enjoy the OTL Kubrick film and also understand that it didn't do Jack Torrance's character justice. Book Jack was a normal man who was tortured by the hotel into villainy and only went on the final rampage after being fully possessed by the hotel. Film Jack was a fairly-flat character who seemingly barely needed an excuse to go on a murderous rampage. It's no wonder that King hated it given that it ruined the character who symbolizes his own struggles with addiction.

Also I'm of the opinion that nothing should be considered a "fixed point". The fun of quests like this is the "What If" factor.

Also I want to do a two-part adaptation of IT as soon as King publishes the book.
 
Yeah, but if we make a masterpiece of an adaptation that get's the author's stamp of approval that'd also cement his desire to continue to work with us. It'd be the best of both worlds. Namely an adaptation that's truer to the text while still being a great film.
But what you're forgetting is that after Kubrick made The Shining, King tried to make another version closer to the source material as a TV Show. It's not that good, but that's neither here nor there. We can still be involved in that here. We can be the ones he goes to for the TV Show version, which works even better if we get the TV Studio soon. It all works out in the end and everyone can get what they want. Kubrick makes the movie, King won't want to work with other studios(particularly Universal because Kubrick is stuck with them for right now), we make the TV Show version that is more faithful for King, and King favors us for all future adaptations. It's a win win.
I can enjoy the OTL Kubrick film and also understand that it didn't do Jack Torrance's character justice. Book Jack was a normal man who was tortured by the hotel into villainy and only went on the final rampage after being fully possessed by the hotel. Film Jack was a fairly-flat character who seemingly barely needed an excuse to go on a murderous rampage. It's no wonder that King hated it given that it ruined the character who symbolizes his own struggles with addiction.
I think I'm going to cry after reading this.😭 Seriously though, it's fine you felt that way, but I definitely don't agree.
Also I'm of the opinion that nothing should be considered a "fixed point". The fun of quests like this is the "What If" factor.
I'm not talking about fixed points, I just don't want Kubrick's version to be butterflied lol
Also I want to do a two-part adaptation of IT as soon as King publishes the book.
I'm cool with that as long as we try to keep Tim Curry as Pennywise.
 
Last edited:
@Kaiser Chris Quick question, since you seemed to be the most interested in the Rugrats idea+omake. Do you think I should make any changes to the kids? Like making them more based on Mary, Wallie, Brandon, (I think Dave Alistair has a kid?), etc., or do you think I should keep them the same?

I think either way is fine. The OTL cast is pretty good but if you want to center TTL's Rugrats around Mary, Wally and friends along with Bruce, Carrie and the other adults like George and Marcia then that could lead to new and interesting dynamics that Rugrats never took and be a fun family show.
 
But what you're forgetting is that after Kubrick made The Shining, King tried to make another version closer to the source material as a TV Show. It's not that good, but that's neither here nor there. We can still be involved in that here. We can be the ones he goes to for the TV Show version, which works even better if we get the TV Studio soon. It all works out in the end and everyone can get what they want. Kubrick makes the movie, King won't want to work with other studios(particularly Universal because Kubrick is stuck with them for right now), we make the TV Show version that is more faithful for King, and King favors us for all future adaptations. It's a win win.

The gist of my first comment was that we make a movie that balances faith to the source material and being an entertaining film. The stupid living hedge animals, for example, wouldn't be a part of it.

I think I'm going to cry after reading this.😭 Seriously though, it's fine you felt that way, but I definitely don't agree.

And now you made me feel like I kicked a puppy. I still like Jack Nicholson's performance. But it shares very little in common with Jack Torrance in the book.

I'm not talking about fixed points, I just don't want Kubrick's version to be butterflied lol

We don't know how Kubrick's career trajectory is going to change because of the existence of his Napoleon magnum opus.

I didn't get involved in this thread to get into an argument over a film. I like participating in these threads, as I said before, because of the "What If?" factor. It's the reason why I'll never turn down an Alternate MCU Producer quest.

I'm cool with that as long as we try to keep Tim Curry as Pennywise.

My whole idea regarding IT is seeing how Curry can do with a bigger budget and a script unhindered by being on TV.
 
I know I'm a little late to the party but I just wanted to give my thoughts to the two recent hot topic escalation issues of the DC money and the "Napoleonic Restoration". In terms of the DC sales numbers, I don't regard it as solely being from comics rather it's the sale of all DC merch. VHS, shirts, lunchboxes, toys, etc. Is it a bit high for the collective merch of the time? Sure. But I like to believe that the Quest kind of takes place in a world where movies and entertainment are held in higher regard and are treated both socially and commercially as a more serious and integral part of everyday life, kind of like a less extreme version of Yugioh and Duel Monsters. So long as it's not something incredulous like Star Wars making a trillion dollars or national and global politics being reguarly decided by films that's fine with me.

Also in terms of the meta aspect of the Quest, I treat these high numbers as sort of a meta balancing of the gameplay, both for us as Bruce and Lucsafilms and for our competitors. Money is a currency system both literally in the narrative and for gameplay to be used for resource acquisition for actions in filmmaking and other commercial and charitable ventures. By making so much money, our competitors gain the resources necessary to match up with Lucasfilms and stay as relevant competitors, thus enhancing gameplay by giving us Questors a challenge to overcome in the competition. Besides, I don't think Magoose is going to translate this into Alan being the next Warren Buffet and making constant 100 million dollar movies, not to mention that he has to spend a huge chunk of his newfound fortune paying off his titanic debt and stock buying to clean house.

In terms of Napoleon, yeah it's a little bit silly, but I don't think Magoose is going to dedicate huge portions of the timeline to French politics and history and cause it to radically change. Coming from Alternatehistory.com, this is a pretty medium sized divergence in terms of absurdity and is nothing compared to the craziness that can come from the site in terms of "Serious TLs". Absurd premises can lead to being fun in alternate history so long as there's effort being put in and it's not a blatant wank such as how one of AH's most popular TLs is one where Colonel Sanders becomes President. Magoose rolled a 99 for France and this is the result. Have to say that it is a bit silly to find fault with this when Bruce is a living Forrest Gump who just beat Muhammad Ali and no one was objecting to Dracula causing the Romanian Revolution.

As for the actual plausibility of President Bonaparte, it's difficult but not impossible. Any Frenchman or student of French history is free to correct me, but I think Bonaparte could manage to do this in 1981 if he managed to place second in the French Presidential election and Mitterand just barely was 3rd. OTL, Mitterand and the Socialists won big time because the French were tired of Conservatives ruling the country for the past three decades and they wanted change after the stagnation and economic turbulence of the 70s. If Mitterand doesn't get on the second round ballot and Napoleon has a lot of Leftist positions then I think that the French Left along with Right defectors (The French Right was undergoing a fracture at the time) could propel him to victory against d'Estaing. However, Napoleon would likely have to form a Rainbow coalition of the Left and Right and name a Socialist as his Prime Minister.

A wild card in this election would definitely be the Romanian Revolution which might be the key to mitigating the Left's victory despite OTL seeing them be in a surge. If the Soviets inflict high atrocities and genocide or ethnic cleansing on the Romanians or it escalates into wars with the rest of the Warsaw Pact, then the Communists are going to be obliterated and the Socialists might schism or falter in popularity, not enough to be irrelevant, but making them weaker than their OTL high position. A similar damage was done in 1968 with the Prague Spring and without Romania it would be a lot more difficult to prevent a Mitterand victory, although Mitterand in and of himself isn't a wonder candidate as he came in 2nd and only got 51.5% of the vote.

Perhaps a more natural election for Napoleon VII would be in 1993 where the Socialists got obliterated in the polls thanks to economic troubles, scandal, party fatigue and frustration over Mitterands right-leaning sympathies and governance. Here the Right would rise but Nationalism was also rising, and Napoleon could absorb those who would go to FN and gain the following of disenchanted Liberals and Socialists to be elected President, not to mention he'd be taken more seriously with him and his Bonapartist party being active for more than a decade. Although it would take a long time to get there so I can understand the more catharsis and fun route of 1981.

Sure the election is a bit out there but it can be done. Celebrity elections are growing more common nowadays, look for two extremes in Trump and Zelensky, one a real estate mogul and the other an actor who became nationally popular because he played the President in a TV show. Something far more difficult in implementation would be an outright Napoleonic Restoration which would need the rest of the Napoleon movies to perform as good as the first one and for Charles Napoleon to be the French Washington and Lincoln fused with the Left and Right looking upon him as fondly as FDR and Reagan.
 
For me, personally, if the French Republic had been overthrown and the Thurd French Empire had been declared with Napoleon VII being placed as Emperor, then yeah, I'd also be questioning what on earth is going on.

But Napoleon VII simply being elected president is actually a very plausible divergence, especially with Napoleon doing so well.
 
Alan being the next Warren Buffet and making constant 100 million dollar movies, not to mention that he has to spend a huge chunk of his newfound fortune paying off his titanic debt and stock buying to clean house.
In saying that, I also think that it would be highly likely that the only reason he would get multiple 100+ million dollar movies, and make profit...

is wait for it: Requies the help of Lucasfilm's directors, screenwriters, actors, or even ILM and our other companies.

Remember one of our investment bonuses literally doubles the profits of the movies that we make. And Colombia can potentially get that from us if we work for them.

Also, the fact that most of our films are incredibly high quality, compared to say, the average film of this era, which may also help with why they are making so much money.

Also, we have an entire media thing called the Eisner Division, which has mastered marketing the shit out of all our films.

WE can make money hand over fist.
But Napoleon VII simply being elected president is actually a very plausible divergence, especially with Napoleon doing so well.
Thats how I saw it at least, its crazy enough that its a little silly, not not so far-fetched as to not be unrealistic in this crazy world.
 
Last edited:
For me, personally, if the French Republic had been overthrown and the Thurd French Empire had been declared with Napoleon VII being placed as Emperor, then yeah, I'd also be questioning what on earth is going on.

But Napoleon VII simply being elected president is actually a very plausible divergence, especially with Napoleon doing so well.

If by some bizarre path the Third French Empire is formed years into the future of the Quest, I don't think we'll see the Enlightened Despotism of Napoleon or the Constitutional Authoritarianism of Napoleon III. In all likelihood it would just be a purely ceremonial thing like Britain or Japan because even if Charles is a awesome President, France has had too many bad monarchs to give anyone hereditary power.

In saying that, I also think that it would be highly likely that the only reason he would get multiple 100+ million dollar movies, and make profit...

is wait for it: Requies the help of Lucasfilm's directors, screenwriters, actors, or even ILM and our other companies.

Remember one of our investment bonuses literally doubles the profits of the movies that we make. And Colombia can potentially get that from us if we work for them.

Also, the fact that most of our films are incredibly high quality, compared to say, the average film of this era, which may also help with why they are making so much money.

Also, we have an entire media thing called the Eisner Division, which has mastered marketing the shit out of all our films.

WE can make money hand over fist.

Thats how I saw it at least, its crazy enough that its a little silly, not not so far-fetched as to not be unrealistic in this crazy world.

I was more saying that Alan is NOT going to use his newfound wealth to make uber budget movies like Universal.

Man, the 80s are going to be interesting for geopolitics. The leaders of the free world are Reagan, Thatcher and Napoleon.

Northside of the hills, above Sunset

Huh, since that area is pretty much all residential I guess we're gonna be mansion building. How much would it cost to convert 100 acres of the land into a residential neighborhood with mansions?
 
Huh, since that area is pretty much all residential I guess we're gonna be mansion building. How much would it cost to convert 100 acres of the land into a residential neighborhood with mansions?
Depend on how many stuff you want?

Mansions and housing? Rather cheap in the hundreds of millions.

Anything more, or different?

Try billions of dollars.
 
In terms of the DC sales numbers, I don't regard it as solely being from comics rather it's the sale of all DC merch. VHS, shirts, lunchboxes, toys, etc. Is it a bit high for the collective merch of the time? Sure.
The problem I have it is not "a bit high for the collective merch at the time"... It is so high that it makes the Bonapartist restoration tame by comparison.

To put it into perspective 5-6 billion $ is what DC would get on a really good year of the 2020s combining the total revenues of Both Batman and Superman franchises (and that is combining comic, merchandising, movies, TV series...)

And translate that amount from 80s money to today money and that is more than 20 billion $

I really think that the all the merchandising sales rolls should have at least one zero removed so that there is at least some amount of realism regarding the economic side of the quest
 
Last edited:
The Assets of Bruce "the Goose" O'Brien (as of December 1978)
The Assets of Bruce "the Goose" O'Brien (as of December 1978)
1 Black Ford Falcon
1 California Driver's License
353,817,277 Dollars in US Currency
48% Lucasfilms Unlimited Ownership
1 Mansion in Beverly Hills
185 Acres of Beverly Hills Developments
100% Ownership stake in 10 Story California apartment building.
Bruce's Fighting skills
Bruce's Sex Appeal (Subjective)

Things to add:

  • Animals:
    • Ginger O'Brien (Scottish Fold, Queen)
    • Friday O'Brien (Kieger Mustang, Stallion)
  • Firearms:
    • PPE (Ear & Eye Pro)
    • Mossberg 500 shotgun (×1)
    • Smith & Wesson Model 10 revolver (x1)
    • Winchester Model 1894 rifle (×1)
  • Instruments:
    • Beginner Guitar
    • Jimi Hendrix's Guitar
  • Library:
    • Classical Literature
      • English
      • Irish
      • Cantonese
      • Japanese
      • French
    • Graphic Novels
    • Musical Notes (Guitar)
    • National Geographic Catalog (1888 - Present: Complete & Up to Date)
    • Pulp Fiction
    • Outfits:
    • Casual
    • Casual Sailing
    • Jean Suit
    • Costumes:
      • Han Solo
      • Stormtrooper (x2)
      • Imperial Officer Uniform (x1)
    • MMA Sparring
  • Vehicles:
    • 1970 Ford Mustang Boss 302 Fastback (Highland Green)

There is more from @Orion Ultor rewards that I just could not find.

AN: You also have not gotten the profits from Conan yet. So that is why Your money is kinda a bit low.

Also, Bruce's Charecter Sheet has been updated, and oh boy, Bruce is almost at 100 for Acting.

And that is fantastic.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top