i concede to the point that "it's easier to read the character this way" was bad phrasing. however, in my defense: 1) i was confused while reading the last chapter because i couldn't remember if the matrix used the singular or the plural to refer to themself and was posting the advice i started using in order to un-confuse myself, and 2) i Do think that the matrix is presented within the story as, if not identical to a non-binary person, at least comparable or thematically parallel, and it would not be nuanced to ignore that when discussing the matrix's identity.
My problem with your previous argument is not that I want to ignore some aspect of the character, be it parallels to Non-Binary or whatever else. My problem is that it's an appeal to archetype, instead of consideration of personal reasoning of character. In my eyes, to say "The Matrix uses "I" becouse they are Non-Binary" is the same as to say "Lisa wants to appear smartest in the room becouse she is a Know-it-all" or "Joe saved the Undersiders from Bakuda becouse he is a Hero". All of that is an appeal to archetype, a categorization of character that is not a substitute for understanding of character's motivation. Lisa's, Joe's and The Matrix's reasoning for actions does not stem nor stop at being something, so if one desires to understand them, one should not just start thinking of them as an archetype and stop there.
As a bonus, becouse I seem to have a problem with shutting up, I give an example of how appeal to archetype loses in nuance. "Weld wants Apeiron's treatment becouse he is Case 53" and "Gully wants Apeiron's treatment becouse she is Case 53" are factually correct appeals to archetypes and if someone just looked at those statements they would be able to conclude that Weld's and Gully's motivations are the same. That would be a wrong conclusion. Yes Weld is Case 53, but he is primarily motivated by his powers and sensory deprivation that stems from it, and yes Gully is Case 53, but she is primarily motivated by her appearance and problems that stem from it. So in a theoretical situation where treatment for C53 can change powers, but treated's appearance will suffer in proportion to how bad it already was, Weld would sign up, while Gully would not think the trade is worth it. In the opposite situation, where treatment can only change appearance, but power issues will get exacerbated, Gully and Weld would trade places in their degree of wiliness to sign up. That's how we have two character that can be classified to the same archetype, but their action will still be drastically different in the same situation, becouse their action are driven not by just being Case 53, but by personal reasoning.
actually, i might be reading the situation wrong - is the europa side story supposed to replace the mainline story chapter for the next update cycle or are both dropping at the same time / another 3rd option?
Another 3rd option. Europa chapter will be dropping some time in a week, probably around the day of the anniversary. For the record, week of anniversary is off week in BCF schedule and Lord did not say that AU chapter will replace mainline story chapter in schedule or anything like that. So in theory, chapter of ECF around the 1st of May and BCF around 9th May. And ECF or any other side project Lord planing will not have a set schedule, nor will they take priority over BCF's schedule.