- Location
- Mid-Atlantic
The Federation has a history of backing off when the locals say they don't want the Federation deciding their future and declaring their independence.
The Romulans... don't.
Furthermore, note where I talk about what *I* consider desirable...
I don't want the Licori to become OUR puppet. I just don't want them to become a Romulan puppet, either.
The Romulans... don't.
Furthermore, note where I talk about what *I* consider desirable...
Try flipping 'Federation' and 'Romulan' there.I said:Now see, we did in fact topple the old government, entirely by accident. The question is not whether or not a government gets replaced. It is who gets to replace it.
In my eye, the only really good options are "the Licori alone," or "a joint Licori/Romulan/Federation negotiated agreement." Having the Federation dominate the replacement process isn't good but at least it doesn't harm the Federation. But having the Romulans dominate the process is just terrible from the point of view of both us and the Licori, especially any Licori who didn't want to be a Romulan puppet state.
I don't want the Licori to become OUR puppet. I just don't want them to become a Romulan puppet, either.
I can understand that, but I'm nervous as heck about some of the stated reasons why people voted for this option in light of its specific wording.I took the specific wording not to mean the intention of why to vote, but how it will be publicly framed.
The "theme" around which our diplomacy will be launched.
I suspect that we'll try to push back, but the vote is how publicly and loudly we're telling the Romulans to fuck off.
I don't want to back them into a position where we've locked them into an adversarial role instead of a cooperative one.