There is a stereotyped reason to go slow. Our words here could be defining social status. That has to do with "identity" and incomplete emotional maturity. Kids get upset by this stuff. We would like to be correct, but not create stress. As a player, is is easy for me to just say "solved that." We have full insight. The required steps are not trivial.
I agree, other friends are seeing the same thing using inference. They don't know how deep this runs. The text is easy enough - "she is treating her friend in a preferred manner." Not even Homura is ready to voice the sub-text as we understand it. The situation here is riding on the edge of "admit you have a crush." As this could lead to her first time talking about either emotion in public, do we want to join the friends pushing her to do that? Maybe you have personal memories of middle school to guide you?
That is one way girls can relate. It is forceful. Is this the Sabrina-Homura dynamic?
We also have the choice to "be gentle with a maiden's heart."
If we could do a good deed here, it should be to establish a future scene that leads to Homura reciprocating further trust with Sayaka.
A frustrated Sayaka whose more inclined to start digging for answers on her own. Probably.
Your criticism is valid; the way that could be dealt with is by offering Sayaka a reason to wait. If you want her to wait. In this case, a conversation with the source is better than gossip. She won't go everywhere else, only to Homura, and Sabrina will be present.
@HeroCycle. I don't see the reason to give Sayaka here absolutely nothing to work with. She's already figured out this much on her own. She's already acknowledged there are things we can't talk about with it being well implied she's going to respect that. Thus there are things we can say here and things we can't. I'm of the opinion you've drawn the line of what we can and can't say to Sayaka far too soon including things that are already out there and well established.
Not even being allowed to say 'Homura cares about Madoka very much'. This detail is already out there. It's been out there for ages OoC. There's no real reason why we can't say it.
I think it's safe to say we'd all prefer if it's Homura who in the end talks about her past to varying degree's. I think we all want that.
I don't think it's our role here to play mediator but to help convince Homura that it's alright to talk about at least some aspects of her past with her friends. And until then perhaps convince Sayaka to be patient and understanding with Homura's reluctance until she does.
There is only a small distinction we are debating, perhaps "2%" difference. My greed is trying to be useful?
[X] Sayaka did notice
-[X] How does she think Madoka feels about that?
-[X] Is she aware what sort of answer she is asking for?
-[X] Would she leave it to us to schedule a time for her to ask Homura?
-[X] We want to help them during a complicated conversation that might result.
-[X] We can't speak for Homura, but we can vouch for her.
--[X] By the Goddess.
[X] Consider Chinese IRC contact with Sayaka
[X] Enchant some Grief
The fact is effectively public. On the other hand, Homura is still not updating herself with that, because she has attitudes and experiences that get in the way. Convincing Homura to explicitly share is a good goal.
Sharing the historical past is an issue well behind the task of "share your emotional state" in this case.
It may be the shortest route to healthier behavior if we stay neutral with anyone else, and save our rational evaluation for private time with Homura alone. A mediator position avoids emotional turmoil better than other persuasion.
If I may reduce Kaizuki's evaluation down to a nugget, this is all about getting a handle on Homura's potential upcoming
wish rejection crisis.
Heading that off is on the radar, and it would appeal to me, very strongly, to optimize for it. Fewer bumps in our deep communication with Homura count towards that?
Firn has given us a fun breakout issue here. I am thankful, challenged and entertained to offer my very best.