Onmur
Archangel of Nutella.
I'm thinking about the O&K conversation and am considering a though:
Were we to bring up O&K in the context of bringing adults into the known about magic, would it make a difference whether we bring up O&K first, or whether we bring up adults first?
E.g.:
"Homura, Sayaka, what do you think should be done about Oriko?... When we bring adults into this, the Mikis will learn who burned your home, Sayaka, and the adult Kures will learn what their daughter and daughter in law did."
Compare to:
"We should bring the adults into the know. What do you think should be done about O&K?"
I think in the second case, we would be putting the idea in at least Sayaka's head, that her parents should be involved in deciding Oriko's punishment, while in the first case, Homura and Sayaka would probably feel more free to form opinions closer to in a vacuum, in which they don't need to weight in what would adults think.
In the hypothetical case we bring up adults and magic and O&K in this conversation, which would be the better order? (And what other main points need to be brought up? We kind of have a growing list of 'how to deal with Oriko' possibilities, but I think that's something we'd like to maybe present after getting opinions, so as to not colour the opinions we're given).
Were we to bring up O&K in the context of bringing adults into the known about magic, would it make a difference whether we bring up O&K first, or whether we bring up adults first?
E.g.:
"Homura, Sayaka, what do you think should be done about Oriko?... When we bring adults into this, the Mikis will learn who burned your home, Sayaka, and the adult Kures will learn what their daughter and daughter in law did."
Compare to:
"We should bring the adults into the know. What do you think should be done about O&K?"
I think in the second case, we would be putting the idea in at least Sayaka's head, that her parents should be involved in deciding Oriko's punishment, while in the first case, Homura and Sayaka would probably feel more free to form opinions closer to in a vacuum, in which they don't need to weight in what would adults think.
In the hypothetical case we bring up adults and magic and O&K in this conversation, which would be the better order? (And what other main points need to be brought up? We kind of have a growing list of 'how to deal with Oriko' possibilities, but I think that's something we'd like to maybe present after getting opinions, so as to not colour the opinions we're given).