Wizard wrangler is arguably not a leadership job, though. It's a liason job. You aren't supposed to be telling other wizards what to do or "leading" them in tasks. You're supposed to keep an eye on what they're doing, warn them if they're up to something that'll get the dwarves upset, maybe lend or work out an opportunity to lend a hand if needed.
If I were to compare it to a sports team, wrangler isn't the team coach. It's the team manager, who makes sure the locker room is clean, that everybody's equipment gets put away, and that the training schedule doesn't double-book anything.
Yes? That's what technical leadership looks like in an engineering role. Giving orders to software engineers is
guaranteed to go horribly wrong. The closest you get is publishing thinkpieces identifying potential high-level problems and proposing general solutions and directions for the team to move in.
Check out this example design document by Joel Spolsky for a simple website. The process of building and finalizing that document involves making sure all the resources and infrastructure bits and libraries are available, making sure the requirements match user needs, making sure the algorithms are fundamentally viable, and finally talking to everyone involved and addressing their complaints before sign-offs. Nine-tenths of the real, actual Hard Problems in high-level engineering
look like what a team manager would do in sports.
And that's precisely what Panoramia is doing for the terraforming work. She can't personally test the soil quality. She can't even
give orders to test the soil quality. She's working at an entirely different and higher level than that. What she has to do is, first, get reports that some crops are failing and the drainage is a bit wonky and notice that there's a stream with an odd color in a corner somewhere and realize there's an unusual soil chemistry issue somewhere and it needs to be nailed down. Then she has to go around to the pig farmers and the arborists and the gardeners and the potato farmers and the wheat farmers and the gong farmers and the entomologists and the geologists and the hydrologists and the civil engineers and the chemists and integrate all of their information. Then she writes up a proposal that says "We need to know these things about the soil. We need to know them in these places. We need to know them to this degree of precision. We need to know them by this date. We can use these tests. We can get the materials from here. We'll collect, organize, and analyze the raw test results like this. We'll distribute the resulting conclusions like this. Here are the teams that have agreed to add responsibilities to their monthly plans." Then she goes over the proposal with representatives of all of those groups and makes sure it's feasible and addresses their needs. Then she publishes the proposal and it starts happening. Then she goes around to all of the involved teams once a week asking how the soil tests are doing and checking on the results and maybe suggesting adjustments based on early evidence and how the organization is working out in practice.
It looks an awful lot like what a "team manager" does, doesn't it? And it looks quite a lot like what a Mathilde does, too. Read the Duckling Club meetings. She doesn't give orders. She says things like "I set up a firing range in the mountains so you can practice your blasty spells." And "Maybe brush up on your fundamentals." And "I'm heading to Karag Dum, anyone up for joining?". And "Watch the Marienburg situation." And "Gotri was working on something like that, go talk to him." It's the same thing but on a much lower level - identify problems, collect information, create proposals, collect consensus, organize solution. And it's what high-level professional software engineers do. No orders. Orders
don't work at that level of complexity. It isn't a single game that you can call plays for. You have to lead the organization in a useful direction by moving in that direction yourself with enough visibility and supporting evidence and arguments that everyone follows.
BoneyM -> MoneyB
Money = Dollary
That's as far as I get as a possible answer.
Correct. BoneyM, swap the letters to get MoneyB, pick a different word for "money" and then tweak for alliteration and Aussieness to get DollaryDoo.