[X] Plan Perfectly Balanced
While the less I say about my satisfaction level with the process and results of our favour-spending this turn, the happier everyone else will probably be.I'm rather relieved by the briefing really, even if we spent two gallons of AV to be told relatively little, at least we know that they weren't dabbling in daemons or heretical runes. To put it another way, we know the Runemasters of Karag Dum weren't being Runemasters of Karag Dumb.
Not sure switching styles like that is practical. A lot of muscle memory involvedI mean, there's no reason we can't have both, aside from AP expenditure which might put people off. In fact, I believe it would be beneficial if we had both, compared to just one or the other. The biggest reason is the advantage of surprise. In my ideal engagement, Mathilde would use Flicker style, where the blade is mostly there, to deal with mooks. Ideally, the image she would give off would simply be of a skilled swordswoman with a fancy sword. The boss goes in with that expectation and prepares to engage accordingly, at which point Mathilde transitions into Reverse Flicker, where the blade is mostly not there, and catches the opponent of guard and kills him. Such an engagement with just one style would, I feel, be a lot more difficult than if Mathilde adds on the element of surprise and misdirection to her bladework, and would also be quite thematic for Grey Wizard.
I appreciate the idea of deceptiveness, but we can effectively already 'hold back' in the manner described by just using the sword like a normal greatsword. Developing a hybrid variation that has weirder muscle memory than either of the other two styles doesn't really seem like the most efficient investment of AP.I mean, there's no reason we can't have both, aside from AP expenditure which might put people off. In fact, I believe it would be beneficial if we had both, compared to just one or the other. The biggest reason is the advantage of surprise. In my ideal engagement, Mathilde would use Flicker style, where the blade is mostly there, to deal with mooks. Ideally, the image she would give off would simply be of a skilled swordswoman with a fancy sword. The boss goes in with that expectation and prepares to engage accordingly, at which point Mathilde transitions into Reverse Flicker, where the blade is mostly not there, and catches the opponent of guard and kills him. Such an engagement with just one style would, I feel, be a lot more difficult than if Mathilde adds on the element of surprise and misdirection to her bladework, and would also be quite thematic for Grey Wizard.
On one hand I am surprised that this has never come up before, but the I realized that dwarfs were not going to ask about magic unless we bring up the the topic or it is very important and even then they would be tactful. Don't want to accidentally ask someone to talk about guild secrets."It's a Hysh dragon," you say, to blank looks. Right, Dwarves. "To channel a Wind, a being has to cultivate a mindset that aligns with it. For example, fire dragons channel Aqshy, the Wind of Fire, which makes them impulsive and temperamental. Hysh, the Wind of Light which Cython channels, requires a calm and thoughtful mental state."
"And yours?" Kazrik asks curiously.
Deception, skulduggery, and plots. "A focus on ambiguities, mystery, and the unexpected," you say instead, and Kazrik nods thoughtfully.
As someone voting for getting them...this really isn't likely to persuade anyone. More likely the reverse.Well there goes another chance to make contacts in a foreign land and see unique applications of magic. How disappointing. As one of the voters for xenophile trait its disappointing how often people come out and say its against her character to try and reach out.
Well there goes another chance to make contacts in a foreign land and see unique applications of magic. How disappointing. As one of the voters for xenophile trait its disappointing how often people come out and say its against her character to try and reach out.
As someone voting for getting them...this really isn't likely to persuade anyone. More likely the reverse.
Don't know if its the tone or something else, but it generated nearly instant antipathy for the idea you're trying to advocate for.