- Location
- Greece
In theory, it shouldn't be possible. The Grudge process involves someone going to the Grudgee and laying out what the problem is, and if they said 'wait I didn't do that' then there'd be a lot of investigation to figure out what's going on. If for whatever reason an innocent Grudgee doesn't communicate that when they have the opportunity, then that's Playing Silly Buggers and they deserve everything they get. If the Grudgee is a being that doesn't get the courtesy of a warning, like a greenskin or a Skaven or whatever, then they're still enemies of the Karaz Ankor so it's not that big a deal. If someone plays a really long con where they manage to trick the entire process into getting a Grudge levelled and executed against an innocent party, then the responsibility for that is entirely on whoever that puppet master was and they get Grudged twice, once for the original Grudge and once for the trick, and while reparations would be made to the innocent Grudgee, the culpability would be considered that of the trickster, not the Dwarves involved.
Ok, I know this is really niche, and just my stupid brain trying to conjure insane scenarios, but.... what if the Grudgee cannot communiccate? Like, if a Grudge was leveled against the We before they were uplifted, they couldn't say anything or even understand why thy were attacked.
Dawi can grudge mountains, so I imagine they could Grudge hypothetical nonuplifted We for killing a Dawi. But then, some wizards manage to communicate and prove hypothetical race was sentient, and wasnt actually them that killed the Dawi (they keep records, just not ones legible to outsiders), the Dawi they were grudged for were killed by orcs, but that race ate the orcs and moved to their place before the next expedition came in. Said next expedition, incidentally, reported that the place of the Dawi apparent death was really in the middle of those strange being's nest. What then?
Last edited: